Suppr超能文献

美国女性化学生物标志物浓度的种族差异综合分析,1999-2014 年。

A comprehensive analysis of racial disparities in chemical biomarker concentrations in United States women, 1999-2014.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2020 Apr;137:105496. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105496. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stark racial disparities in disease incidence among American women remain a persistent public health challenge. These disparities likely result from complex interactions between genetic, social, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors. The influence of environmental risk factors, such as chemical exposure, however, may be substantial and is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

We quantitatively evaluated chemical-exposure disparities by race/ethnicity, life stage, and time in United States (US) women (n = 38,080) by using biomarker data for 143 chemicals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2014.

METHODS

We applied a series of survey-weighted, generalized linear models using data from the entire NHANES women population along with cycle and age-group stratified subpopulations. The outcome was chemical biomarker concentration, and the main predictor was race/ethnicity with adjustment for age, socioeconomic status, smoking habits, and NHANES cycle.

RESULTS

Compared to non-Hispanic White women, the highest disparities were observed for non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, Other Hispanic, and Other Race/Multi-Racial women with higher levels of pesticides and their metabolites, including 2,5-dichlorophenol, o,p'-DDE, beta-hexachlorocyclohexane, and 2,4-dichlorophenol, along with personal care and consumer product compounds, including parabens and monoethyl phthalate, as well as several metals, such as mercury and arsenic. Moreover, for Mexican American, Other Hispanic, and non-Hispanic black women, there were several exposure disparities that persisted across age groups, such as higher 2,4- and 2,5-dichlorophenol concentrations. Exposure levels for methyl and propyl parabens, however, were the highest in non-Hispanic black compared to non-Hispanic white children with average differences exceeding 4-fold. Exposure disparities for methyl and propyl parabens are increasing over time in Other Race/Multi-Racial women while fluctuating for non-Hispanic Black, Mexican American, and Other Hispanic. Cotinine levels are among the highest in Non-Hispanic White women compared to Mexican American and Other Hispanic women with disparities plateauing and increasing, respectively.

DISCUSSION

We systematically evaluated differences in chemical exposures across women of various race/ethnic groups and across age groups and time. Our findings could help inform chemical prioritization in designing epidemiological and toxicological studies. In addition, they could help guide public health interventions to reduce environmental and health disparities across populations.

摘要

背景

在美国女性中,疾病发病率存在明显的种族差异,这仍然是一个持续存在的公共卫生挑战。这些差异可能是由于遗传、社会、生活方式和环境风险因素之间的复杂相互作用造成的。然而,环境风险因素(如化学暴露)的影响可能很大,但人们对此了解甚少。

目的

我们使用来自 1999-2014 年全国健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的 143 种化学物质的生物标志物数据,通过种族/民族、生命阶段和在美国居住时间定量评估女性(n=38080)的化学暴露差异。

方法

我们应用了一系列经过调查加权的广义线性模型,使用整个 NHANES 女性人群的数据以及周期和年龄组分层子人群。结果是化学生物标志物浓度,主要预测因素是种族/民族,同时调整了年龄、社会经济地位、吸烟习惯和 NHANES 周期。

结果

与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,非西班牙裔黑人、墨西哥裔美国女性、其他西班牙裔和其他种族/多种族女性的差异最大,她们体内的杀虫剂及其代谢物水平较高,包括 2,5-二氯苯酚、o,p'-DDE、β-六氯环己烷和 2,4-二氯苯酚,以及个人护理和消费产品化合物,包括对羟基苯甲酸酯和邻苯二甲酸单乙酯,以及几种金属,如汞和砷。此外,对于墨西哥裔美国、其他西班牙裔和非西班牙裔黑人女性,有几个暴露差异在不同年龄组中持续存在,例如 2,4-和 2,5-二氯苯酚浓度较高。然而,与非西班牙裔白人儿童相比,非西班牙裔黑人儿童体内的甲基和丙基对羟基苯甲酸酯水平最高,平均差异超过 4 倍。非西班牙裔黑人、墨西哥裔美国和其他西班牙裔女性体内的甲基和丙基对羟基苯甲酸酯暴露差异随着时间的推移而增加,而其他种族/多种族女性的暴露差异则波动不定。与墨西哥裔美国和其他西班牙裔女性相比,非西班牙裔白人女性的可替宁水平最高,差异分别趋于稳定和增加。

讨论

我们系统地评估了不同种族/民族群体和不同年龄组和时间的女性的化学暴露差异。我们的研究结果可以帮助为设计流行病学和毒理学研究中的化学物质优先级提供信息。此外,它们还可以为减少人群中的环境和健康差异的公共卫生干预措施提供指导。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
The Missing Diversity in Human Genetic Studies.人类遗传研究中的缺失多样性。
Cell. 2019 Mar 21;177(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.048.
5
Applying an Exposome-Wide (ExWAS) Approach to Cancer Research.将全暴露组(ExWAS)方法应用于癌症研究。
Front Oncol. 2018 Aug 27;8:313. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00313. eCollection 2018.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验