• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定在压力性损伤治疗临床试验中测量的内容及测量方法:核心结局集开发方案

Determine what to measure and how to measure in clinical trials for the treatment of pressure injury: A protocol for the development of a core outcome set.

作者信息

Shi Jiyuan, Gao Ya, Si Liangliang, Ma Xinping, Liu Ming, Liao Xiang, Zhang Junmei

机构信息

Evidence-based Nursing Center, School of Nursing.

Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19311. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019311.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000019311
PMID:32118756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7478718/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A core outcome set (COS) is an agreed minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials in specific areas of health care. A considerable amount of trials did not report essential outcomes or outcomes measurement methods, which makes it challenging to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment strategies for pressure injury (PI) and produced significant heterogeneity of reported outcomes. It is necessary to develop a COS, which can be used for clinical trials in PI treatment.

METHODS/DESIGN: The development of this COS will be guided by an advisory group composed of clinicians, senior nurses, patients, and methodologists. We will search six databases and 2 registry platforms to identify currently reported PI treatment outcomes and outcome measurement instruments in randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis, and systematic reviews. We will also conduct a semi-structured interview with clinicians, nurses, and adult PI patients to collect their opinions on important outcomes. Each outcome of the initial list generated from systematic review and interviews will be scored and reach a consensus through two rounds of international Delphi survey with all key stakeholders. A face-to-face consensus meeting with key stakeholders will be conducted to finish a final COS and recommend measurement instruments for each outcome.

RESULTS

We will develop a COS that should be reported in future clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of PI treatment.

DISCUSSION

The COS will follow current guidance to develop a high-quality COS in the field of PI treatment to reduce heterogeneity in trial reporting, facilitate valid comparisons of new therapies, and improve the quality of clinical trials.

摘要

背景

核心结局集(COS)是在特定医疗保健领域的所有临床试验中应报告的一组商定的最小结局。相当数量的试验未报告基本结局或结局测量方法,这使得评估压力性损伤(PI)治疗策略的疗效和安全性具有挑战性,并导致所报告结局存在显著异质性。有必要制定一个可用于PI治疗临床试验的COS。

方法/设计:该COS的制定将由一个由临床医生、高级护士、患者和方法学家组成的咨询小组指导。我们将检索六个数据库和两个注册平台,以识别随机对照试验、荟萃分析和系统评价中目前报告的PI治疗结局和结局测量工具。我们还将对临床医生、护士和成年PI患者进行半结构化访谈,以收集他们对重要结局的意见。通过两轮与所有关键利益相关者的国际德尔菲调查,对系统评价和访谈产生的初始列表中的每个结局进行评分并达成共识。将与关键利益相关者举行面对面的共识会议,以完成最终的COS并为每个结局推荐测量工具。

结果

我们将制定一个应在未来临床试验中报告的COS,以评估PI治疗的有效性。

讨论

该COS将遵循当前指南,在PI治疗领域制定高质量的COS,以减少试验报告中的异质性,促进新疗法的有效比较,并提高临床试验的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a9/7478718/e8d5c2dc4e7f/medi-99-e19311-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a9/7478718/e8d5c2dc4e7f/medi-99-e19311-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a9/7478718/e8d5c2dc4e7f/medi-99-e19311-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Determine what to measure and how to measure in clinical trials for the treatment of pressure injury: A protocol for the development of a core outcome set.确定在压力性损伤治疗临床试验中测量的内容及测量方法:核心结局集开发方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19311. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019311.
2
Development of a Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Non-infectious Uveitis of the Posterior Segment.开发用于后部非感染性葡萄膜炎临床试验的核心结局集。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Aug;128(8):1209-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.022. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Development of a core outcome set (COS) and selecting outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in traditional Chinese medicine clinical trials: study protocol.中医临床试验中非瓣膜性心房颤动核心结局集(COS)的制定及结局测量工具(OMIs)的选择:研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 5;19(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2904-0.
4
Outcomes for Pressure Ulcer Trials (OUTPUTs): protocol for the development of a core domain set for trials evaluating the clinical efficacy or effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention interventions.压力性溃疡试验结局(OUTPUTs):用于评估压力性溃疡预防干预措施临床疗效或有效性的试验的核心领域集制定的方案。
Trials. 2019 Jul 22;20(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3543-9.
5
Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'.有效性试验核心结局指标(COMET)计划:一项国际德尔菲研究的方案,旨在就如何为“核心结局集”中包含的结局选择结局测量工具达成共识。
Trials. 2014 Jun 25;15:247. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-247.
6
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study.骨盆带疼痛核心结局集制定方案,包括结局测量方法:PGP-COS 研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0624-5.
7
IMMPACT-recommended outcome measures and tools of assessment in burning mouth syndrome RCTs: an international Delphi survey protocol.IMMPACT 推荐的灼口综合征 RCT 结局测量指标和评估工具:一项国际 Delphi 调查方案。
Trials. 2020 Aug 12;21(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04640-4.
8
COSUMO: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set for efficacy and effectiveness trials in posterior segment-involving uveitis.COSUMO:一项关于制定涉及后段葡萄膜炎疗效和有效性试验核心结局集的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Dec 1;18(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2294-8.
9
The 'Outcome Reporting in Brief Intervention Trials: Alcohol' (ORBITAL) framework: protocol to determine a core outcome set for efficacy and effectiveness trials of alcohol screening and brief intervention.“简短干预试验中的酒精结果报告”(ORBITAL)框架:确定酒精筛查和简短干预疗效及效果试验核心结局集的方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 22;18(1):611. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2335-3.
10
A core outcome set for clinical trials of first- and second-degree perineal tears prevention and treatment: a study protocol for a systematic review and a Delphi survey.用于初次和二度会阴撕裂预防和治疗临床试验的核心结局集:系统评价和德尔菲调查的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Nov 25;22(1):843. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05820-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Core Outcome Set Development for Tension-Type Headache Treatment Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Delphi Consensus Study.基于中医的紧张型头痛治疗核心结局集的制定:德尔菲共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 5;14:e63481. doi: 10.2196/63481.
2
Establishing a core outcome set for neurogenic bladder trials: study protocol for a scoping review and Delphi surveys.建立神经源性膀胱试验的核心结局集:一项范围综述和德尔菲调查的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Jun 13;23(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06419-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Delphi panelists for a core outcome set project suggested both new and existing dissemination strategies that were feasibly implemented by a research infrastructure project.一个核心结局集项目的德尔菲专家小组提出了新的和现有的传播策略,这些策略可由一个研究基础设施项目切实可行地实施。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;114:104-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.026. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
2
Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.网络几何形状和 Cochrane 网络荟萃分析的不一致性有待改进:一项横断面调查。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep;113:214-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 May 28.
3
Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers.
用于治疗压疮的支撑面。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;10(10):CD009490. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009490.pub2.
4
Development of a core outcome set (COS) and selecting outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in traditional Chinese medicine clinical trials: study protocol.中医临床试验中非瓣膜性心房颤动核心结局集(COS)的制定及结局测量工具(OMIs)的选择:研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 5;19(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2904-0.
5
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.《COMET手册:第1.0版》
Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.
6
Agreement on what to measure in randomised controlled trials in burn care: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set.烧伤护理随机对照试验中测量内容的共识:核心结局集开发的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 2;7(6):e017267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017267.
7
Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2) photographic validation sub-study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.减压支撑表面:随机评估2(PRESSURE 2)照片验证子研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Mar 20;18(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1851-5.
8
Protocol for the development of a core domain set for hidradenitis suppurativa trial outcomes.用于开发化脓性汗腺炎试验结局核心领域集的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e014733. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014733.
9
The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar.来自中国和美国的系统评价的方法学质量和报告质量相似。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 May;85:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.压力缓解支撑面:随机评估2(PRESSURE 2):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 20;17(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1703-8.