IQVIA Brasil, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Biogen Brasil, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229768. eCollection 2020.
In the Brazilian public healthcare system, natalizumab is recommended as fourth-line treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Although natalizumab has already demonstrated higher effectiveness compared with fingolimod in some studies, this real-world study was conducted to evaluate annualized hospitalization rates (AHR) in Brazil for both treatments when switching from platform therapies. As secondary goals, we analyzed RRMS treatment patterns and hospitalization profiles.
We extracted data from the DATASUS database of patients with MS (ICD-10 G35) who initiated treatment from January 2012 to December 2017. Two cohorts were screened for different purposes. Cohort 1 was used to analyze treatment patterns and hospitalization profiles and was defined as individuals who had at least one claim related to MS therapies and had received at least two lines of treatment. The second cohort, which was a subset of the first, was used to compare natalizumab's and fingolimod's AHR reduction from previous treatment lines and included patients switching from platform therapy to one of these two drugs. Cohort 2 adjustment was assessed through two different statistical methods: propensity score (PS) and inverse probability weighting (IPW).
Of 29,410 patients screened, 2,876 were included in cohort 1. Three quarters of hospitalizations reported in this cohort were for treatment of MS relapse. Cohort 2 included 1,005 patients, and natalizumab was more commonly used (n = 540) than fingolimod (n = 465). Both PS and IPW analyses showed that patients treated with natalizumab had a statistical significantly reduction in AHR compared with first-line treatment (p<0.01 for both PS and IPW), while fingolimod did not result in significant reduction in AHR (p = 0.20 for PS and p = 0.17 for IPW).
This study provides real-world evidence of natalizumab's and fingolimod's effectiveness in terms of AHR, with an increased reduction in AHR with natalizumab. The findings of this study also provide information to support disease management and healthcare planning in the Brazilian public healthcare system.
在巴西公共医疗体系中,那他珠单抗被推荐作为复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的四线治疗药物。尽管那他珠单抗在一些研究中已经显示出比芬戈莫德更高的疗效,但这项真实世界的研究旨在评估这两种药物在从平台治疗药物转换时的年化住院率(AHR)。作为次要目标,我们分析了 RRMS 的治疗模式和住院情况。
我们从 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月接受 MS(ICD-10 G35)治疗的患者的 DATASUS 数据库中提取数据。为了不同的目的筛选了两个队列。队列 1 用于分析治疗模式和住院情况,定义为至少有一次与 MS 治疗相关的索赔且至少接受过两种治疗的个体。第二个队列是第一个队列的子集,用于比较那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德从之前的治疗线减少 AHR,并包括从平台治疗转换为这两种药物之一的患者。队列 2 的调整通过两种不同的统计方法进行评估:倾向评分(PS)和逆概率加权(IPW)。
在筛选出的 29410 名患者中,有 2876 名患者被纳入队列 1。该队列中报告的四分之三的住院是为了治疗 MS 复发。队列 2 纳入了 1005 名患者,那他珠单抗的使用更为常见(n = 540),而芬戈莫德(n = 465)。PS 和 IPW 分析均显示,与一线治疗相比,那他珠单抗治疗的患者 AHR 显著降低(PS 和 IPW 均为 p<0.01),而芬戈莫德的 AHR 降低不显著(PS 为 p = 0.20,IPW 为 p = 0.17)。
本研究提供了那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德在 AHR 方面有效性的真实世界证据,那他珠单抗的 AHR 降低幅度更大。这项研究的结果还为巴西公共医疗体系中的疾病管理和医疗保健规划提供了信息支持。