• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低危和中危前列腺癌患者行开放性和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的健康相关生活质量:倾向评分匹配分析。

Health-related quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2020 Dec;38(12):3075-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03144-9. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-020-03144-9
PMID:32130477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8249262/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Introduction of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). However, comparative analyses focused on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after RARP and open retropubic prostatectomy (ORP) are sparse.

METHODS

In the current retrospective analysis, inclusion criteria encompassed PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, ≤ pT2c, ISUP ≤ 3, age ≤ 65 years, and preoperative continence. A propensity score-matched patient cohort [n = 418 (ORP: 209, RARP: 209)] was created and HRQOL was prospectively assessed based on validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30) preoperatively, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Primary endpoint was good general HRQOL based on previously published cut-off values. Erectile function was measured via IIEF-5, urinary continence via ICIQ-SF questionnaire. Multivariable analysis included binary logistic regression models (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Open retropubic prostatectomy and RARP cohorts were well balanced. General HRQOL was significantly higher for ORP compared to RARP after 3 months (70.1 vs. 61.6, p = 0.001), but not at the remaining follow-up time points. There were no significant differences for the remaining QLQ-C30 functioning and symptom scores. In multivariable analysis stratified for IIEF-5 and ICIQ-SF scores and surgeon experience, RARP could be confirmed as a marginally independent predictor for lower ratios of good general HRQOL after 3 months (OR 0.464, 95% CI 0.215-0.999; p = 0.050) without any differences at the remaining time points.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study addresses various HRQOL outcomes over a postoperative period of up to 2 years in a homogenous propensity score-matched contemporary cohort. Marginally better general HRQOL outcomes could be detected for ORP compared to RARP 3 months postoperatively.

摘要

目的

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)的引入彻底改变了局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的治疗格局。然而,关于 RARP 和开放式经耻骨前列腺切除术(ORP)后健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的比较分析很少。

方法

在当前的回顾性分析中,纳入标准包括 PSA≤10ng/ml、≤pT2c、ISUP≤3、年龄≤65 岁和术前控尿。创建了一个倾向评分匹配的患者队列[n=418(ORP:209,RARP:209)],并使用经过验证的问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)在术前、术后 3 个月、12 个月和 24 个月进行前瞻性评估 HRQOL。主要终点是基于先前发表的截止值评估的良好一般 HRQOL。通过 IIEF-5 测量勃起功能,通过 ICIQ-SF 问卷测量尿控。多变量分析包括二元逻辑回归模型(p<0.05)。

结果

开放式经耻骨前列腺切除术和 RARP 队列平衡良好。与 RARP 相比,ORP 在术后 3 个月时的一般 HRQOL 显著更高(70.1 对 61.6,p=0.001),但在其余随访时间点没有显著差异。QLQ-C30 功能和症状评分无显著差异。在按 IIEF-5 和 ICIQ-SF 评分和外科医生经验分层的多变量分析中,RARP 可以被确认为术后 3 个月时一般 HRQOL 较低比例的边缘独立预测因素(OR 0.464,95%CI 0.215-0.999;p=0.050),而在其余时间点没有差异。

结论

本研究在一个同质的倾向评分匹配的当代队列中,在术后长达 2 年的时间内,针对各种 HRQOL 结果进行了研究。与 RARP 相比,ORP 在术后 3 个月时的一般 HRQOL 结果略有改善。

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.低危和中危前列腺癌患者行开放性和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的健康相关生活质量:倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Dec;38(12):3075-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03144-9. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Comparison of oncological and health-related quality of life outcomes between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer - findings from the population-based Victorian Prostate Cancer Registry.开放性与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学及健康相关生活质量结局比较——基于人群的维多利亚州前列腺癌登记处的研究结果
BJU Int. 2016 Oct;118(4):563-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13380. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
3
Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.基于社区的开放式与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.027. Epub 2017 May 9.
4
Impact on quality of life of radical prostatectomy after initial active surveillance: more to lose?初始主动监测后行根治性前列腺切除术对生活质量的影响:失去的更多?
Scand J Urol. 2014 Aug;48(4):367-73. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.876097. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
5
Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria.开放根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者尿控和性功能结局的比较:维多利亚州基于人群的倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-00966-0.
6
Impact of previous transurethral prostate surgery on health-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy: Does the interval between surgeries matter?经尿道前列腺切除术史对根治性前列腺切除术后健康相关生活质量的影响:手术间隔时间是否重要?
World J Urol. 2021 May;39(5):1431-1438. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03327-4. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:一项为期19个月随访的前瞻性对照研究。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Oct;72(5):586-594. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03830-8. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Differences in Quality of Life between German and Dutch Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials.中德荷前列腺癌患者机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生活质量的差异:对国际多中心随机对照试验的启示。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 May;10(3):454-460. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
9
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局比较:来自全国住院患者样本的结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
10
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control.机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌的效果比较。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):666-72. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comments on: Evaluating the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of the Senhance robotic system in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.关于《评估Senhance机器人系统在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的安全性、可行性和结果:一项系统评价和单臂荟萃分析》的评论
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 12;19(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02445-8.
2
Changes in the quality of life of a population of Polish men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a 12-month longitudinal observational study.接受根治性前列腺切除术的波兰男性人群生活质量的变化:一项为期12个月的纵向观察性研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(3):375-382. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.23.R1. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term functional outcomes after robotic vs. retropubic radical prostatectomy in routine care: a 6-year follow-up of a large German health services research study.常规护理中机器人辅助与经耻骨后前列腺切除术的长期功能结局:一项大型德国卫生服务研究的 6 年随访。
World J Urol. 2020 Jul;38(7):1701-1709. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02956-8. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
2
A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures.一项比较研究,纳入 10790 名接受过高度训练的外科医生进行机器人辅助和开放根治性前列腺切除术的男性,两组手术均为这些外科医生进行。
BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1031-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14760. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
3
Response to article "Anxiety, depression, urinary continence, and sexuality in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: preliminary findings".
对文章《根治性前列腺切除术患者的焦虑、抑郁、尿失禁及性功能:初步研究结果》的回应
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jun 21;32(7):448. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08662-5.
4
Health-related quality of life following salvage radical prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy or focal therapy.放疗或局部治疗后复发前列腺癌行挽救性根治性前列腺切除术后的健康相关生活质量。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 18;42(1):242. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04945-y.
5
Anxiety, depression, urinary continence, and sexuality in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: preliminary findings.根治性前列腺切除术患者的焦虑、抑郁、尿失禁和性功能:初步研究结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 18;32(5):294. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08503-5.
6
Associations of flow disruptions with patient, staff, and process outcomes: a prospective observational study of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies.血流中断与患者、医护人员和流程结果的关联:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的前瞻性观察研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):6964-6974. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10162-2. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
7
The Challenges of Patient Selection for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Multicentre Study.前列腺癌局部治疗中患者选择的挑战:一项回顾性观察性多中心研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Sep 22;29(10):6826-6833. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100538.
8
Cytoreductive prostatectomy improves survival outcomes in patients with oligometastases: a systematic meta-analysis.去势前列腺切除术改善寡转移患者的生存结局:一项系统的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug 9;20(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02715-x.
9
Combined Open Prostatectomy and Kidney Surgery: Feasibility and 12-Month Outcome.开放性前列腺切除术与肾脏手术联合进行:可行性及12个月的结果
Res Rep Urol. 2021 Nov 23;13:815-821. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S341823. eCollection 2021.
10
Health-Related Quality of Life following Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with De-Novo Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.初发性寡转移前列腺癌患者行减瘤性根治性前列腺切除术后的健康相关生活质量
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 11;13(22):5636. doi: 10.3390/cancers13225636.
The Impact of Experience on the Risk of Surgical Margins and Biochemical Recurrence after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning Curve Study.
经验对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后手术切缘和生化复发风险的影响:学习曲线研究。
J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):108-113. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000147. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
4
Quality of life in men living with advanced and localised prostate cancer in the UK: a population-based study.英国晚期和局限性前列腺癌男性患者的生活质量:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):436-447. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30780-0. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
5
What is new in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a narrative review.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的新进展:叙述性综述。
Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Jan;29(1):14-18. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000564.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照研究的 24 个月结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review.腹腔镜和机器人辅助与开放性根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:一项 Cochrane 系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):845-853. doi: 10.1111/bju.14062. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
8
Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.基于社区的开放式与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.027. Epub 2017 May 9.
9
Perioperative patient education improves long-term satisfaction rates of low-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.围手术期患者教育可提高低危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后的长期满意度。
World J Urol. 2017 Aug;35(8):1205-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1998-9. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
10
Robotic surgery evaluation: 10 years too late.机器人手术评估:晚了10年。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1026. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31586-0.