Sydney Health Ethics, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building, K25, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Broadway, NSW, 2007, Australia.
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Mar;17(1):75-86. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-09964-z. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
There is growing interest among pharmaceutical policymakers in how to "disinvest" from subsidized medicines. This is due to both the rapidly rising costs of healthcare and the increasing use of accelerated and conditional reimbursement pathways which mean that medicines are being subsidized on the basis of less robust evidence of safety and efficacy. It is crucial that disinvestment decisions are morally sound and socially legitimate, but there is currently no framework to facilitate this. We therefore reviewed the bioethics literature in order to identify ethical principles and concepts that might be relevant to pharmaceutical disinvestment decisions. This revealed a number of key ethical considerations-both procedural and substantive-that need to be considered when making pharmaceutical disinvestment decisions. These principles do not, however, provide practical guidance so we present a framework outlining how they might be applied to different types of disinvestment decisions. We also argue that, in this context, even the most rigorous ethical reasoning is likely to be overridden by moral intuitions and psychological biases and that disinvestment decisions will need to strike the right balance between respecting justifiable moral intuitions and overriding unjustifiable psychological impulses.
医药政策制定者越来越关注如何“撤资”补贴药品。这是因为医疗保健成本的迅速上升,以及加速和有条件的报销途径的使用越来越多,这意味着药品的补贴是基于安全性和疗效的证据不够稳健。撤资决策必须在道德上合理且在社会上合法,但目前没有框架来促进这一点。因此,我们回顾了生物伦理学文献,以确定可能与药品撤资决策相关的伦理原则和概念。这揭示了在做出药品撤资决策时需要考虑的一些关键伦理考虑因素——程序和实质性的都需要考虑。然而,这些原则并没有提供实际指导,因此我们提出了一个框架,概述了如何将它们应用于不同类型的撤资决策。我们还认为,在这种情况下,即使是最严格的伦理推理也可能被道德直觉和心理偏见所推翻,撤资决策需要在尊重合理的道德直觉和克服不合理的心理冲动之间取得恰当的平衡。