• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics.中国古代医学伦理与生物医学伦理的四项原则。
J Med Ethics. 1999 Aug;25(4):315-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.4.315.
2
Not just autonomy--the principles of American biomedical ethics.不仅仅是自主性——美国生物医学伦理学的原则。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):332-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.332.
3
Medicine--the art of humaneness: on ethics of traditional Chinese medicine.医学——仁术:论中医伦理学
J Med Philos. 1988 Aug;13(3):277-99.
4
Chinese medical ethics and euthanasia.中国医学伦理学与安乐死
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Winter;2(1):69-76. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100000657.
5
Self-determination vs. family-determination: two incommensurable principles of autonomy: a report from East Asia.自我决定与家庭决定:自主性的两个不可通约原则:一份来自东亚的报告。
Bioethics. 1997 Jul-Oct;11(3-4):309-22. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00070.
6
Hard times, hard choices: founding bioethics today.艰难时刻,艰难抉择:当今生物伦理学的创立
Bioethics. 1995 Jul;9(3-4):192-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00355.x.
7
The changing doctor-patient relationship and the new medical ethics.不断变化的医患关系与新的医学伦理学
SA J Contin Med Educ. 1987 Apr;5(4):27, 29, 32-34.
8
Principlism and its alleged competitors.原则主义及其所谓的竞争对手。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995 Sep;5(3):181-98. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0111.
9
Medicine is a humane art: the basic principles of professional ethics in Chinese medicine.医学是一门人道的艺术:中医职业道德的基本原则。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug;30(4 Suppl):S8-12.
10
Telling stories as a way of doing ethics.将讲故事作为一种践行伦理学的方式。
Conn Med. 1987 Nov;51(11):725-31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rhazes' views on qualifications of physicians, a historical review.拉齐的医师资格观:历史考察
Arch Iran Med. 2022 Jul 1;25(7):473-479. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.77.
2
Ethical Pricing: a Confucian Perspective.道德定价:儒家视角
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 Oct 17;12(4):419-433. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00146-y. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Ethical Guiding Principles of "Do No Harm" and the "Intention to Save Lives" in relation to Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Finding Common Ground between Religious Views and Principles of Medical Ethics.人类胚胎干细胞研究中“不伤害”和“挽救生命意图”的伦理指导原则:探寻宗教观点与医学伦理原则之间的共同基础
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2019 Dec 6;11(4):409-435. doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00103-4. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Use of the welfare-based model in the application of palliative sedation.基于福利的模式在姑息性镇静中的应用
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2018 Mar 17;10(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s41649-018-0050-3. eCollection 2018 Mar.
5
Patient privacy and autonomy: a comparative analysis of cases of ethical dilemmas in China and the United States.患者隐私与自主权:中美伦理困境案例的比较分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 2;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00579-6.
6
Confucianism and organ donation: moral duties from xiao (filial piety) to ren (humaneness).儒家思想与器官捐赠:从孝到仁的道德义务
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Dec;22(4):583-591. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09893-8.
7
Chinese medical students' agreement with and fulfillment of the Physician Charter.中国医学生对《医师宪章》的认同和践行。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1324-x.
8
Lost in 'Culturation': medical informed consent in China (from a Western perspective).迷失在“文化适应”中:中国的医疗知情同意(从西方视角看)
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Mar;22(1):17-30. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9835-0.
9
Control under times of uncertainty: the relationship between hospital competition and physician-patient disputes.在不确定的时代下进行控制:医院竞争与医患纠纷之间的关系。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Nov 28;16(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0701-0.
10
The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times.《希波克拉底誓言》与当代医学伦理道德价值观的相关性。第一部分:从古代到现代的《希波克拉底誓言》
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jul;27(7):1481-1490. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Not just autonomy--the principles of American biomedical ethics.不仅仅是自主性——美国生物医学伦理学的原则。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):332-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.332.
2
Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope.医学伦理学:四项原则外加对范围的关注。
BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):184-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184.

中国古代医学伦理与生物医学伦理的四项原则。

Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics.

作者信息

Tsai D F

机构信息

University of Manchester.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1999 Aug;25(4):315-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.4.315.

DOI:10.1136/jme.25.4.315
PMID:10461594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC479240/
Abstract

The four principles approach to biomedical ethics (4PBE) has, since the 1970s, been increasingly developed as a universal bioethics method. Despite its wide acceptance and popularity, the 4PBE has received many challenges to its cross-cultural plausibility. This paper first specifies the principles and characteristics of ancient Chinese medical ethics (ACME), then makes a comparison between ACME and the 4PBE with a view to testing out the 4PBE's cross-cultural plausibility when applied to one particular but very extensive and prominent cultural context. The result shows that the concepts of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice are clearly identifiable in ACME. Yet, being influenced by certain socio-cultural factors, those applying the 4PBE in Chinese society may tend to adopt a "beneficence-oriented", rather than an "autonomy-oriented" approach, which, in general, is dissimilar to the practice of contemporary Western bioethics, where "autonomy often triumphs".

摘要

自20世纪70年代以来,生物医学伦理的四原则方法(4PBE)日益发展成为一种通用的生物伦理方法。尽管4PBE被广泛接受且广受欢迎,但它在跨文化合理性方面面临诸多挑战。本文首先明确了中国古代医学伦理(ACME)的原则和特点,然后将ACME与4PBE进行比较,以检验4PBE应用于一个特定但非常广泛且突出的文化背景时的跨文化合理性。结果表明,在ACME中可以清晰地识别出尊重自主性、不伤害、行善和公正的概念。然而,受某些社会文化因素的影响,在中国社会应用4PBE的人可能倾向于采取“以行善为导向”而非“以自主性为导向”的方法,这总体上与当代西方生物伦理的实践不同,在西方“自主性往往占上风”。