Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4918-y.
Human psittacosis, caused by Chlamydia (C.) psittaci, is likely underdiagnosed and underreported, since tests for C. psittaci are often not included in routine microbiological diagnostics. Source tracing traditionally focuses on psittacine pet birds, but recently other animal species have been gaining more attention as possible sources for human psittacosis. This review aims to provide an overview of all suspected animal sources of human psittacosis cases reported in the international literature. In addition, for each animal species the strength of evidence for zoonotic transmission was estimated.
A systematic literature search was conducted using four databases (Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Proquest). Articles were included when there was mention of at least one human case of psittacosis and a possible animal source. Investigators independently extracted data from the included articles and estimated strength of evidence for zoonotic transmission, based on a self-developed scoring system taking into account number of human cases, epidemiological evidence and laboratory test results in human, animals, and the environment.
Eighty articles were included, which provided information on 136 different situations of possible zoonotic transmission. The maximum score for zoonotic transmission was highest for turkeys, followed by ducks, owls, and the category 'other poultry'. Articles reporting about zoonotic transmission from unspecified birds, psittaciformes and columbiformes provided a relatively low strength of evidence. A genotypical match between human and animal samples was reported twenty-eight times, including transmission from chickens, turkeys, guinea fowl, peafowl, pigeons, ducks, geese, songbirds, parrot-like birds and owls.
Strong evidence exists for zoonotic transmission from turkeys, chickens and ducks, in addition to the more traditionally reported parrot-like animal sources. Based on our scoring system, the evidence was generally stronger for poultry than for parrot-like birds. Psittaciformes should not be disregarded as an important source of human psittacosis, still clinicians and public health officials should include poultry and birds species other than parrots in medical history and source tracing.
鹦鹉热由鹦鹉热衣原体(C. psittaci)引起,由于 C. psittaci 的检测通常不包含在常规微生物诊断中,因此该病可能被漏诊和漏报。传统的溯源重点是鹦鹉科宠物鸟,但最近其他动物物种作为人类鹦鹉热的可能来源受到了更多关注。本综述旨在概述国际文献中报道的所有疑似人类鹦鹉热病例的动物来源。此外,还对每种动物物种的人畜共患病传播证据强度进行了评估。
使用四个数据库(Pubmed、Embase、Scopus 和 Proquest)进行了系统的文献检索。当提到至少 1 例人类鹦鹉热病例和可能的动物来源时,文章被纳入。研究人员独立从纳入的文章中提取数据,并根据自我制定的评分系统,根据涉及人类病例数量、人类、动物和环境中的流行病学证据和实验室检测结果,评估人畜共患病传播的证据强度。
共纳入 80 篇文章,这些文章提供了 136 种可能人畜共患病传播情况的信息。传播证据的最高评分来自火鸡,其次是鸭子、猫头鹰和“其他家禽”。报告未指定鸟类、鹦鹉目和鸠鸽目动物人畜共患病传播的文章提供的证据强度相对较低。有 28 次报道了人与动物样本的基因型匹配,包括来自鸡、火鸡、珍珠鸡、孔雀、鸽子、鸭、鹅、鸣禽、鹦鹉状鸟类和猫头鹰的传播。
除了传统报道的鹦鹉状动物来源外,从火鸡、鸡和鸭传播到人类的证据确凿。根据我们的评分系统,家禽的证据强度普遍强于鹦鹉状鸟类。不应忽视鹦鹉目作为人类鹦鹉热的重要来源,但临床医生和公共卫生官员应在病史和溯源中纳入家禽和除鹦鹉以外的鸟类。