Suppr超能文献

口服多西环素与静脉注射头孢曲松治疗莱姆神经Borreliosis 的比较:一项多中心、等效性、随机、开放标签试验。

Oral Doxycycline Compared to Intravenous Ceftriaxone in the Treatment of Lyme Neuroborreliosis: A Multicenter, Equivalence, Randomized, Open-label Trial.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Infectious Diseases, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 26;72(8):1323-1331. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa217.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is often treated with intravenous ceftriaxone even if doxycycline is suggested to be noninferior to ceftriaxone. We evaluated the efficacy of oral doxycycline in comparison to ceftriaxone in the treatment of LNB.

METHODS

Patients with neurological symptoms suggestive of LNB without other obvious reasons were recruited. The inclusion criteria were (1) production of Borrelia burgdorferi-specific antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or serum; (2) B. burgdorferi DNA in the CSF; or (3) an erythema migrans during the past 3 months. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, or intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g daily for 3 weeks. The participants described their subjective condition with a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (0 = normal; 10 = worst) before the treatment, and 4 and 12 months after the treatment. The primary outcome was the change in the VAS score at 12 months.

RESULTS

Between 14 September 2012 and 28 December 2017, 210 adults with suspected LNB were assigned to receive doxycycline (n = 104) or ceftriaxone (n = 106). The per-protocol analysis comprised 82 patients with doxycycline and 84 patients with ceftriaxone. The mean change in the VAS score was -3.9 in the doxycycline group and -3.8 in the ceftriaxone group (mean difference, 0.17 [95% confidence interval, -.59 to .92], which is within the prespecified equivalence margins of -1 to 1 units). Participants in both groups improved equally.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral doxycycline is equally effective as intravenous ceftriaxone in the treatment of LNB.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT01635530 and EudraCT 2012-000313-37.

摘要

背景

莱姆神经Borreliosis(LNB)通常用静脉注射头孢曲松治疗,即使强力霉素被认为不比头孢曲松差。我们评估了口服强力霉素与头孢曲松治疗 LNB 的疗效。

方法

招募有神经症状提示 LNB 而无其他明显原因的患者。纳入标准为:(1)脑脊液(CSF)或血清中产生伯氏疏螺旋体特异性抗体;(2)CSF 中存在伯氏疏螺旋体 DNA;或(3)过去 3 个月中有游走性红斑。参与者以 1:1 的比例随机接受每日 2 次口服强力霉素 100mg,共 4 周,或每日 1 次静脉注射头孢曲松 2g,共 3 周。参与者在治疗前、治疗后 4 个月和 12 个月时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)从 0 到 10 分(0=正常;10=最差)描述其主观状况。主要结局为 12 个月时 VAS 评分的变化。

结果

2012 年 9 月 14 日至 2017 年 12 月 28 日,210 例疑似 LNB 的成年人被分配接受强力霉素(n=104)或头孢曲松(n=106)治疗。方案分析包括 82 例强力霉素组和 84 例头孢曲松组患者。强力霉素组 VAS 评分的平均变化为-3.9,头孢曲松组为-3.8(平均差值,0.17[95%置信区间,-0.59 至 0.92],在预设的-1 至 1 个单位等效边界内)。两组参与者的改善程度相同。

结论

口服强力霉素与静脉注射头孢曲松治疗 LNB 同样有效。

临床试验注册

NCT01635530 和 EudraCT 2012-000313-37。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验