• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自评政治倾向与对 COVID-19 大流行期间现金转移政策的态度之间的关联:在韩国进行的全国性横断面调查。

Association Between Self-Rated Political Orientation and Attitude Toward the Cash Transfer Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Conducted in South Korea.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.

Research Analytics and Communications, Gallup Korea, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 May 17;10:887201. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.887201. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.887201
PMID:35655455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9152266/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the relationship between self-rated political orientation and attitude toward the cash transfer policy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study conducted in South Korea during the pandemic included a stratified sample of 1,004 respondents (aged 19 years and older). We tested the hypotheses that political orientation shapes attitudes toward social policies and that other socioeconomic factors might have relatively minor importance. Logistic regression was used to identify associations between political orientation and attitude toward the cash transfer policy. Average marginal effects were calculated to determine the effect size of each variable.

RESULTS

Political orientation, age, and residential area were correlated with attitudes toward the policy. Compared to the conservatives, the non-committed and the moderate showed about 10% more favorable attitudes, and the progressive group showed robust support. People in their 30s and 40s showed similar attitudes to the 18-29 group, while older people showed much lower support. Compared to the Seoul metropolitan area, residents of the Ho-nam area showed favorable attitudes, and those of the Yeong-nam area had relatively unfavorable attitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that attitudes toward the cash transfer policy are mainly associated with political orientation. Although these results illuminate pandemics' social and political dimensions, further efforts are needed to fully understand the determinants and mechanisms of attitudes toward policies outside the traditional health policy scope.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了自我评估的政治取向与对 COVID-19 大流行期间现金转移政策的态度之间的关系。

方法

本研究在韩国大流行期间进行了一项横断面研究,包括 1004 名受访者(年龄在 19 岁及以上)的分层样本。我们检验了以下假设:政治取向塑造了对社会政策的态度,而其他社会经济因素的相对重要性较小。使用逻辑回归来确定政治取向与对现金转移政策的态度之间的关联。计算平均边际效应以确定每个变量的效应大小。

结果

政治取向、年龄和居住地区与政策态度相关。与保守派相比,不坚定派和温和派表现出约 10%更有利的态度,进步派表现出强烈支持。30 多岁和 40 多岁的人对 18-29 岁群体的态度相似,而老年人的支持率则低得多。与首尔大都市区相比,湖南地区的居民表现出有利的态度,而岭南地区的居民则持相对不利的态度。

结论

本研究表明,对现金转移政策的态度主要与政治取向相关。尽管这些结果揭示了大流行的社会和政治层面,但需要进一步努力来充分了解传统卫生政策范围之外的政策态度的决定因素和机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/69f17352c8e7/fpubh-10-887201-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/e8d9a63f1206/fpubh-10-887201-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/26d1e6ed15aa/fpubh-10-887201-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/e1969b5a34f3/fpubh-10-887201-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/69f17352c8e7/fpubh-10-887201-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/e8d9a63f1206/fpubh-10-887201-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/26d1e6ed15aa/fpubh-10-887201-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/e1969b5a34f3/fpubh-10-887201-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34ef/9152266/69f17352c8e7/fpubh-10-887201-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Association Between Self-Rated Political Orientation and Attitude Toward the Cash Transfer Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Conducted in South Korea.自评政治倾向与对 COVID-19 大流行期间现金转移政策的态度之间的关联:在韩国进行的全国性横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 17;10:887201. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.887201. eCollection 2022.
2
Policy-Relevant Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination: Associations With Demography, Health Risk, and Social and Political Factors.对新冠疫苗接种的政策相关态度:与人口统计学、健康风险以及社会和政治因素的关联
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 6;9:671896. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.671896. eCollection 2021.
3
It's Politics, Isn't It? Investigating Direct and Indirect Influences of Political Orientation on Risk Perception of COVID-19.这是政治问题,不是吗?调查政治取向对 COVID-19 风险认知的直接和间接影响。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):56-68. doi: 10.1111/risa.13801. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
4
Political Ideologies, Government Trust, and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Survey.政治意识形态、政府信任与韩国的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫:一项横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10655. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010655.
5
The Influence of COVID-19 Information Sources on the Attitudes and Practices Toward COVID-19 Among the General Public of Saudi Arabia: Cross-sectional Online Survey Study.《沙特阿拉伯普通公众对 COVID-19 的态度和实践受 COVID-19 信息源影响的研究:横断面在线调查》
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jul 30;7(7):e28888. doi: 10.2196/28888.
6
Intergroup Contact, COVID-19 News Consumption, and the Moderating Role of Digital Media Trust on Prejudice Toward Asians in the United States: Cross-Sectional Study.群体间接触、新冠疫情新闻消费以及数字媒体信任在美国对亚裔偏见的调节作用:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 25;22(9):e22767. doi: 10.2196/22767.
7
The Determinants of Adherence to Public Health and Social Measures Against COVID-19 Among the General Population in South Korea: National Survey Study.韩国普通民众对 COVID-19 公共卫生和社会措施的依从性决定因素:全国调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 17;9:e35784. doi: 10.2196/35784.
8
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on unmet healthcare needs in Seoul, South Korea: a cross-sectional study.《COVID-19 大流行对韩国首尔未满足医疗需求的影响:一项横断面研究》。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e045845. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045845.
9
The Impact of Political Orientation and Government Change on Public Satisfaction with Food Policy in South Korea.政治倾向与政府更迭对韩国民众食品政策满意度的影响
Foods. 2024 May 7;13(10):1442. doi: 10.3390/foods13101442.
10
Attitudes toward the pandemic and COVID-19 vaccination intention among German university students and the general population: Results from two cross-sectional surveys.德国大学生和普通民众对大流行的态度和对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的意愿:两项横断面调查的结果。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;10:1098911. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1098911. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
National identity predicts public health support during a global pandemic.国家认同预测全球大流行期间的公共卫生支持。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 26;13(1):517. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27668-9.
2
Risk perceptions and politics: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.风险认知与政治:来自新冠疫情的证据
J financ econ. 2021 Nov;142(2):862-879. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.039. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
3
SARS-CoV-2 elimination, not mitigation, creates best outcomes for health, the economy, and civil liberties.消除新冠病毒(SARS-CoV-2),而非缓解,才能为健康、经济和公民自由带来最佳结果。
Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2234-2236. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00978-8. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
Coronavirus risk perception and compliance with social distancing measures in a sample of young adults: Evidence from Switzerland.冠状病毒风险认知与瑞士青年群体对社会疏离措施的遵从度:一项实证研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247447. eCollection 2021.
5
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.党派之间在保持社交距离方面的分歧与 COVID-19 大流行期间的健康结果有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
6
Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国新冠疫情大流行第一周期间风险认知及自我报告的防护行为变化
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200742. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Economic impact of government interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: International evidence from financial markets.新冠疫情期间政府干预措施的经济影响:来自金融市场的国际证据
J Behav Exp Finance. 2020 Sep;27:100371. doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2020.100371. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
Mitigating the wider health effects of covid-19 pandemic response.减轻新冠疫情应对措施对更广泛健康的影响。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 27;369:m1557. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1557.
10
Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys.信任对中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)在韩国爆发期间作为情感和认知维度的两种不同风险感知的影响:连续横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 4;10(3):e033026. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033026.