• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达格列净与二甲双胍对饮食和运动控制不佳的中国糖尿病患者的经济学评价

Economic evaluation of dapagliflozin versus metformin in Chinese patients whose diabetes is inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

作者信息

Nian Hua, Wan Xu, Ma Jing, Jie Fu, Wu Bin

机构信息

1Department of Pharmacy, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

2Medical Decision and Economic Group, Department of Pharmacy, Ren Ji Hospital, South Campus, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Jiangyue Road 2000, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Feb 28;18:12. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00208-w. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s12962-020-00208-w
PMID:32140079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7048053/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the long-term economic outcome of dapagliflozin versus metformin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) whose diet and exercise have not provided sufficient glycemic control.

METHODS

An economic analysis of dapagliflozin versus metformin was conducted by using the Chinese Outcomes Model for T2DM with a time horizon of lifetime, which was developed and validated based on the Chinese population. The efficacy data of lowering HbA1c of dapagliflozin and metformin was derived from a network meta-analysis. Other clinical, cost and utility inputs were obtained from published sources. Lifetime discounted quality-adjusted life-years, cost, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were measured. The uncertainty was facilitated by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The comparison of metformin and dapagliflozin in Chinese patients with insufficient glycemic control by diet and exercise showed that dapagliflozin was more costly and produced fewer health benefits in our simulated cohort. The sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Dapagliflozin is not likely to be cost-effective compared with metformin for Chinese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

摘要

背景

在中国2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,饮食和运动无法实现充分血糖控制,本研究旨在探讨达格列净与二甲双胍相比的长期经济结局。

方法

采用基于中国人群开发并验证的中国2型糖尿病结局模型,对达格列净与二甲双胍进行了为期终身的经济分析。达格列净和二甲双胍降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的疗效数据来自网络荟萃分析。其他临床、成本和效用数据来自已发表的资料。测量了终身贴现质量调整生命年、成本和增量成本效益比。通过单向和概率敏感性分析来评估不确定性。

结果

对于饮食和运动血糖控制不佳的中国患者,二甲双胍与达格列净的比较显示,在我们的模拟队列中,达格列净成本更高且产生的健康效益更少。敏感性分析表明结果具有稳健性。

结论

对于饮食和运动控制不佳的中国T2DM患者,与二甲双胍相比,达格列净不太可能具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ee/7048053/52b292a69a41/12962_2020_208_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ee/7048053/cb22e032ca76/12962_2020_208_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ee/7048053/f8c825a57be6/12962_2020_208_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ee/7048053/52b292a69a41/12962_2020_208_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ee/7048053/cb22e032ca76/12962_2020_208_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ee/7048053/f8c825a57be6/12962_2020_208_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ee/7048053/52b292a69a41/12962_2020_208_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of dapagliflozin versus metformin in Chinese patients whose diabetes is inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.达格列净与二甲双胍对饮食和运动控制不佳的中国糖尿病患者的经济学评价
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Feb 28;18:12. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00208-w. eCollection 2020.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Canagliflozin Versus Dapagliflozin Added to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in China.在中国2型糖尿病患者中,卡格列净与达格列净联合二甲双胍治疗的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 8;10:480. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00480. eCollection 2019.
3
Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors as an add-on to Metformin in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from a UK Healthcare System Perspective.从英国医疗保健系统角度看,达格列净与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂作为二甲双胍附加治疗2型糖尿病的成本效益
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 5;15:496. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1139-y.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin as Add-On to Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece.在希腊,达格列净作为二甲双胍的附加药物用于治疗2型糖尿病的成本效益
Clin Drug Investig. 2016 Aug;36(8):649-59. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0410-2.
5
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Canagliflozin 300 mg Versus Dapagliflozin 10 mg Added to Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States.美国2型糖尿病患者中,卡格列净300毫克与达格列净10毫克联合二甲双胍治疗的成本效益分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Apr;9(2):565-581. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0371-y. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin (Forxiga®) added to metformin compared with sulfonylurea added to metformin in type 2 diabetes in the Nordic countries.在北欧国家2型糖尿病患者中,达格列净(安达唐®)联合二甲双胍与磺脲类药物联合二甲双胍相比的成本效益。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2015 Feb;9(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 May 17.
7
The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sulfonylurea as an add-on to metformin in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.达格列净与磺脲类药物作为二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病附加用药的成本效益分析
Diabet Med. 2015 Jul;32(7):890-8. doi: 10.1111/dme.12772. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin versus glimepiride as monotherapy in a Chinese population with type 2 diabetes mellitus.在中国2型糖尿病患者中,达格列净与格列美脲单药治疗的成本效益分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):359-369. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1257978. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
9
Evaluating the costs of glycemic response with canagliflozin versus dapagliflozin and empagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United Arab Emirates.在阿拉伯联合酋长国2型糖尿病患者中,评估卡格列净与达格列净和恩格列净作为二甲双胍附加治疗时的血糖反应成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jun;33(6):1155-1163. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1310091. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
10
Cost-Utility Analysis of Dapagliflozin Compared to Sulfonylureas for Type 2 Diabetes as Second-Line Treatment in Indian Healthcare Payer's Perspective.从印度医疗保健支付方角度比较达格列净与磺脲类药物作为二线治疗药物用于2型糖尿病的成本-效用分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Oct 22;13:897-907. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S328433. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.
2
Narrative review of data supporting alternate first-line therapies over metformin in type 2 diabetes.支持2型糖尿病患者使用二甲双胍以外的其他一线治疗方法的数据的叙述性综述。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2024 Mar 25;23(1):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s40200-024-01406-6. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
A systematic review on reporting quality of economic evaluations for negotiated glucose-lowering drugs in China national reimbursement drug list.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Canagliflozin Versus Dapagliflozin Added to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in China.在中国2型糖尿病患者中,卡格列净与达格列净联合二甲双胍治疗的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 8;10:480. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00480. eCollection 2019.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of dapagliflozin treatment versus metformin treatment in Chinese population with type 2 diabetes.达格列净与二甲双胍治疗中国2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
J Med Econ. 2019 Apr;22(4):336-343. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1570220. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Primary Prevention with Statin Treatment for Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
中国国家医保药品目录谈判降糖药的经济评价报告质量的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 1;24(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11001-3.
4
Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review.中国国家医保谈判药品的已发表药物经济学评价中存在的赞助偏倚:一项系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov 29;8(11):e012780. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012780.
5
Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of 2011-2020 Publications on Physical Activity Therapy for Diabetes.2011 - 2020年糖尿病体育活动疗法相关出版物的文献计量与可视化分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 7;9:807411. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.807411. eCollection 2022.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 Inhibitors Added to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in China.中国 2 型糖尿病患者二甲双胍联合使用二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂的成本效益分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 13;12:684960. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.684960. eCollection 2021.
7
The Cost-Effectiveness of Lifestyle Interventions for Preventing Diabetes in a Health Resource-Limited Setting.生活方式干预在资源有限环境下预防糖尿病的成本效益。
J Diabetes Res. 2020 Apr 13;2020:7410797. doi: 10.1155/2020/7410797. eCollection 2020.
他汀类药物治疗中国 2 型糖尿病患者的一级预防的成本效益。
Adv Ther. 2018 Dec;35(12):2214-2223. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0823-9. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Is metformin still the most efficacious first-line oral hypoglycaemic drug in treating type 2 diabetes? A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.二甲双胍仍是治疗 2 型糖尿病最有效的一线口服降糖药吗?一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2019 Jan;20(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/obr.12753. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
Development and validation of a Health Policy Model of Type 2 diabetes in Chinese setting.中文医疗政策模型在 2 型糖尿病领域的开发与验证。
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Aug;7(8):749-763. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0001. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
6
What have we learnt from "real world" data, observational studies and meta-analyses.从“真实世界”数据、观察性研究和荟萃分析中我们学到了什么。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20 Suppl 1:47-58. doi: 10.1111/dom.13178.
7
Cost-effectiveness of prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcer and amputation in a health resource-limited setting.在医疗资源有限的情况下预防和管理糖尿病足溃疡和截肢的成本效益。
J Diabetes. 2018 Apr;10(4):320-327. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12612. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、地区和国家残疾调整生命年(DALYs)用于 333 种疾病和伤害以及 195 个国家和地区的健康期望寿命(HALE),1990-2016 年:全球疾病负担研究 2016 年的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1260-1344. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32130-X.
9
Development and validation of Risk Equations for Complications Of type 2 Diabetes (RECODe) using individual participant data from randomised trials.使用来自随机试验的个体参与者数据开发和验证 2 型糖尿病并发症风险方程 (RECODe)。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Oct;5(10):788-798. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30221-8. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
10
Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013.2013年中国糖尿病及糖尿病前期的患病率与民族分布特征
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2515-2523. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7596.