Suppr超能文献

年轻成年男性吸烟者与非吸烟者骨转换标志物的比较

Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers.

作者信息

Al-Bashaireh Ahmad M, Alqudah Ola

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, JOR.

Family Medicine, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Jan 27;12(1):e6782. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6782.

Abstract

Background This study aims to compare the differences in the means of bone formation and resorption markers between young adult male smokers and nonsmokers. Methods This study employed a cross-sectional, descriptive design. Thirty-five smokers and 38 nonsmokers were recruited. All participants completed self-reported questionnaires about demographics, physical activity, and smoking status. In addition, blood specimens were collected to determine serum levels of bone turnover markers. Results Regarding bone formation markers, the least square means (LSM) for osteoprotegerin (OPG) and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) were similar for smoking and nonsmoking groups. Regarding bone resorption markers, the LSM serum carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTXI) level was found to be significantly lower in smokers than nonsmokers [0.82 ± 0.83 vs. 1.30 ± 0.82 ng/mL, F (1, 66) = 5.73, p = 0.020]. The LSM for soluble-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (sRANKL) [1.64 ± 0.60 vs. 1.69 ± 0.62 ng/mL, F (1,64) = 10.74, p = 0.002] and RANKL/OPG [2.62 ± 1.09 vs. 2.81 ± 1.10 ng/mL, F (1,65) = 5.88, p = 0.018] were different for smoking and nonsmoking groups. Exploration of the moderating influence of physical activity on smoking effects revealed significant effect for the interaction between smoking status and physical activity on sRANKL [F (2, 64) = 8.63, p = 0.001] and RANKL/OPG ratio [F (2, 65) = 5.49, p = 0.006]. Conclusion Our study provides evidence for the effect of smoking on bone resorption markers in young adult males. Such effects should be carefully considered side by side with other lifestyles that may lead to poor bone health and increased risk for osteoporosis.

摘要

背景 本研究旨在比较年轻成年男性吸烟者与非吸烟者之间骨形成和骨吸收标志物均值的差异。方法 本研究采用横断面描述性设计。招募了35名吸烟者和38名非吸烟者。所有参与者均完成了关于人口统计学、身体活动和吸烟状况的自我报告问卷。此外,采集血样以测定骨转换标志物的血清水平。结果 关于骨形成标志物,吸烟组和非吸烟组骨保护素(OPG)和I型前胶原N端前肽(PINP)的最小二乘均值(LSM)相似。关于骨吸收标志物,发现吸烟者的LSM血清I型胶原羧基末端肽(CTXI)水平显著低于非吸烟者[0.82±0.83 vs. 1.30±0.82 ng/mL,F(1, 66)=5.73,p = 0.020]。吸烟组和非吸烟组的可溶性核因子κB受体活化因子配体(sRANKL)的LSM[1.64±0.60 vs. 1.69±0.62 ng/mL,F(1,64)=10.74,p = 0.002]以及RANKL/OPG[2.62±1.09 vs. 2.81±1.10 ng/mL,F(1,65)=5.88,p = 0.018]不同。对身体活动对吸烟影响的调节作用的探索显示,吸烟状况与身体活动之间的相互作用对sRANKL[F(2, 64)=8.63,p = 0.001]和RANKL/OPG比值[F(2, 65)=5.49,p = 0.006]有显著影响。结论 我们的研究为吸烟对年轻成年男性骨吸收标志物的影响提供了证据。应将这些影响与其他可能导致骨骼健康不佳和骨质疏松风险增加的生活方式一并仔细考虑。

相似文献

2
Smoking and other determinants of bone turnover.吸烟和其他骨转换的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0225539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225539. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

7
Osteoporosis: Pathophysiology and therapeutic options.骨质疏松症:病理生理学与治疗选择。
EXCLI J. 2020 Jul 20;19:1017-1037. doi: 10.17179/excli2020-2591. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

2
The Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Musculoskeletal Health: A Systematic Review.吸烟对肌肉骨骼健康的影响:一项系统评价。
J Environ Public Health. 2018 Jul 11;2018:4184190. doi: 10.1155/2018/4184190. eCollection 2018.
5
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005-2015.当前美国成年人吸烟状况 - 2005-2015 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(44):1205-1211. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6544a2.
6
Skeletal Effects of Smoking.吸烟对骨骼的影响。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015 Oct;13(5):302-9. doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0278-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验