Taher Mohamed Kadry, Farhat Nawal, Karyakina Nataliya A, Shilnikova Nataliya, Ramoju Siva, Gravel Christopher A, Krishnan Kannan, Mattison Donald, Wen Shi-Wu, Krewski Daniel
Risk Sciences International, 251 Laurier Ave W, Suite 700, Ottawa, ON K1P 5J6, Canada.
McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
Data Brief. 2020 Feb 20;29:105277. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105277. eCollection 2020 Apr.
This paper describes data from a systematic review and meta-analysis [1] conducted to identify and evaluate published peer reviewed evidence on the association between perineal use of talc powder and risk of ovarian cancer. These data were collected from multiple electronic bibliographic databases, as well as from grey literature sources, without applying time, language or other filters. A meta-analysis was conducted to quantitatively assess the ovarian cancer risk in relation to talc use and other potential risk factors.
本文描述了一项系统评价和荟萃分析[1]的数据，该分析旨在识别和评估已发表的同行评审证据，以探讨会阴部使用滑石粉与卵巢癌风险之间的关联。这些数据来自多个电子文献数据库以及灰色文献来源，未设置时间、语言或其他筛选条件。进行了一项荟萃分析，以定量评估滑石粉使用及其他潜在风险因素与卵巢癌风险的关系。
