Department of 'Organi Di Senso', University "Sapienza", Via Satrico 7, 00183, Rome, Italy.
Department of Head-Neck Surgery, Otolaryngology, Head-Neck and Oral Surgery Unit, Morgagni Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jun;277(6):1793-1800. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05883-2. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
To show the different effects of expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) and barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (BRP) on muscle tension and muscle fiber tearing using a comparative experimental stress test with a frog thigh muscle model.
Frog thigh muscle was used for this experimental study. A Barbed suture was used to simulate the BRP pharyngoplasty whereas a Vicryl 3-0 suture was used to simulate the ESP technique. The other extremity of the suture was attached to traction scales. The traction scales were used to measure the weight relative to the amount of force required to obtain muscle breaking. Both surgical techniques were simulated on the frog muscle. Traction was performed until muscle breaking was observed, measuring the value of force needed to obtain muscle rupture.
Specimen muscle breakdown in the ESP simulation occurred with an average value of 0.7 kg of traction force. Contrarily, specimen muscle breakdown in the BRP simulation with Barbed suture occurred with an average value of 1.5 kg of traction force CONCLUSION: During simulation of the ESP technique, specimen muscle breakdown occurred with an average value of traction force lower than in the BRP technique. During traction the multiple lateral sustaining suture loops of BRP could ensure greater stability then the single pulling tip suture of ESP with minor risk of muscle fiber damage.
通过使用青蛙大腿肌肉模型进行比较实验性应激测试,展示扩张咽缩肌成形术(ESP)和带刺复位咽成形术(BRP)对肌肉张力和肌纤维撕裂的不同影响。
本实验研究使用青蛙大腿肌肉。使用带刺缝线模拟 BRP 咽成形术,而使用 Vicryl 3-0 缝线模拟 ESP 技术。缝线的另一端连接到牵引秤上。牵引秤用于测量相对于获得肌肉断裂所需的力的重量。两种手术技术均在青蛙肌肉上进行模拟。进行牵引,直到观察到肌肉断裂,测量获得肌肉破裂所需的力值。
ESP 模拟中标本肌肉断裂的平均牵引力为 0.7 公斤。相比之下,BRP 模拟中带刺缝线的标本肌肉断裂的平均牵引力为 1.5 公斤。
在 ESP 技术模拟过程中,标本肌肉断裂的平均牵引力低于 BRP 技术。在牵引过程中,BRP 的多个侧向支撑缝线环可以比 ESP 的单牵引尖端缝线提供更大的稳定性,同时肌肉纤维损伤的风险较小。