Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Aug;92(2):405-411. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.049. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
In recent years, the feasibility and safety of endoscopic placement of different biodegradable biliary stents have been investigated. New, helicoidally shaped, biliary and pancreatic biodegradable stents have been developed for endoscopic use. Stents are provided in different sizes and with 3 expected speeds of degradation: slow (11 weeks), medium (20 days), and fast (12 days). The aim of this study was to evaluate degradation time, technical outcomes, and safety of these stents.
This was a single-center, prospective, pilot study (August 2018 to January 2019) of consecutive patients with indication for biliary or pancreatic plastic stent positioning during ERCP. The primary outcome was the evaluation of degradation time of the stents, which was controlled by abdominal radiograph. Secondary outcomes were the evaluation of specific stent-related technical features (loadability, pushability, and fluoroscopic visibility) as compared with commonly used plastic stents and adverse events (AEs).
Thirty-eight patients (11 women [28.9%]; median age, 68.05 ± 10.74 years) who received 53 biodegradable stents (34 [64.2%] biliary and 19 [35.8%] pancreatic stents) were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five (66%) slow-degrading stents, 6 (11.3%) medium-degrading stents, and 12 (22.6%) fast-degrading stents were used. At time 1, partial degradation of the stents was present in 48 cases (90.6%). Five stents (9.4%) prematurely migrated. At the subsequent time 2 evaluation, complete degradation occurred in 100% of cases. Stent loadability was defined as excellent in all cases. Pushability of the stent was scored as excellent in 48 cases (90.5%), good in 4 cases (7.5%), and fair in 1 case (1.9%). Fluoroscopic visualization was excellent in 11 cases (20.8%), good in 39 cases (73.6%), and fair in 3 (5.6%). Only 1 AE of mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred.
The results of our study suggest that the biodegradation of the new biliary and pancreatic stents is reliable and in line with expected times and technically successful in a variety of indications. Further randomized multicenter studies are required to validate our preliminary findings. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03767166.).
近年来,不同可生物降解胆道支架内镜置入的可行性和安全性已得到研究。新型螺旋状可生物降解胆道和胰腺支架已被开发用于内镜使用。支架有不同的尺寸,并具有 3 种预期的降解速度:缓慢(11 周)、中等(20 天)和快速(12 天)。本研究的目的是评估这些支架的降解时间、技术结果和安全性。
这是一项单中心、前瞻性、试点研究(2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 1 月),连续纳入需要在 ERCP 期间进行胆道或胰腺塑料支架定位的患者。主要结局是通过腹部 X 线片评估支架的降解时间。次要结局是评估与常用塑料支架相比,支架的特定支架相关技术特征(可装载性、可推送性和荧光透视可视性)和不良事件(AE)。
共纳入 38 例患者(11 例女性[28.9%];中位年龄 68.05±10.74 岁),共置入 53 枚可生物降解支架(34 枚[64.2%]胆道支架和 19 枚[35.8%]胰腺支架)。使用 35 枚(66%)慢速降解支架、6 枚(11.3%)中速降解支架和 12 枚(22.6%)快速降解支架。在第 1 次评估时,48 例(90.6%)出现支架部分降解。5 枚支架(9.4%)过早迁移。在随后的第 2 次评估时,100%的病例完全降解。支架可装载性在所有病例中均定义为优秀。支架可推送性评分 48 例(90.5%)为优秀,4 例(7.5%)为良好,1 例(1.9%)为尚可。荧光透视显影 11 例(20.8%)为优秀,39 例(73.6%)为良好,3 例(5.6%)为尚可。仅发生 1 例轻度 ERCP 后胰腺炎的不良事件。
本研究结果表明,新型胆道和胰腺支架的生物降解是可靠的,符合预期时间,在各种适应证中技术上是成功的。需要进一步的随机多中心研究来验证我们的初步发现。(临床试验注册号:NCT03767166.)