Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4 Canada.
Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Ave., Charlottetown, PE, C1A 4P3 Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jun;103(6):5746-5758. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17804. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
Many contemporary dairy cattle housing practices are at odds with societal perceptions of positive animal welfare. The public (i.e., those external to the dairy industry) typically emphasizes the importance of naturalness for dairy cattle, such as through provision of pasture, freedom of movement, and the ability to interact socially with conspecifics. Yet, in the United States, the majority of lactating dairy cattle are reportedly housed without any access to pasture, and almost 39% of dairy farms use tiestalls, which restrict movement and social interactions. In addition to being in conflict with public expectations, a lack of pasture access and restrictive housing systems are also in conflict with the animals' own motivations, which can adversely affect their welfare. For example, dairy cattle are highly motivated to access pasture and show a reduction in oral stereotypies when allowed on pasture after periods of tethering. Calves housed without social contact have cognitive deficits and exhibit increased fear responses to novelty. We argue that the long-term sustainability of the dairy industry will depend on the extent to which housing systems reflect public concerns and the animals' priorities. The adoption of technologies, such as automated feeders and remote monitoring systems, may represent a means to practically promote the animals' natural behavior while simultaneously improving individualized care. Although older generations of the public may consider technological solutions to be a further deviation from naturalness and a departure from dairy farming's agrarian roots, the definition of "naturalness" for younger generations may well have expanded to include technology. As the buying power shifts to these younger generations, the adoption of technologies that promote natural cattle behaviors may be one means toward reconciling the disconnect between public perceptions of animal welfare and contemporary dairy farming practices.
许多当代奶牛养殖实践与社会对动物福利的积极认知相悖。公众(即乳制品行业以外的人)通常强调奶牛的自然性,例如提供牧场、自由活动以及与同类社交的能力。然而,在美国,据报道,大多数泌乳奶牛在没有任何牧场的情况下被饲养,近 39%的奶牛场使用限位栏,限制了奶牛的活动和社交互动。缺乏牧场接触和限制的饲养系统不仅与公众的期望相冲突,也与动物自身的动机相冲突,这可能会对它们的福利产生不利影响。例如,奶牛非常渴望接触牧场,在被拴住一段时间后允许在牧场上活动时,它们会减少口部刻板行为。没有社交接触的犊牛会出现认知缺陷,并对新奇事物表现出更多的恐惧反应。我们认为,乳制品行业的长期可持续性将取决于饲养系统在多大程度上反映公众的关切和动物的优先事项。采用自动化饲料器和远程监测系统等技术,可能是一种在提高个性化护理的同时,实际促进动物自然行为的手段。尽管老一辈公众可能认为技术解决方案进一步偏离了自然性,背离了奶牛养殖的农业根源,但年轻一代对“自然性”的定义可能已经扩大到包括技术。随着购买力向这些年轻一代转移,采用促进奶牛自然行为的技术可能是调和公众对动物福利的认知与当代奶牛养殖实践之间脱节的一种手段。