Division of Adolescent and School Health, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Adolescent and School Health, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Prev Med. 2020 May;58(5):e159-e169. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
Exposure to violence victimization may help explain disparities of substance use among gender-nonconforming youth (i.e., those whose gender expression differs from societal expectations).
In 2015, three large urban school districts (2 in California and 1 in Florida) conducted a Youth Risk Behavior Survey that included the assessment of gender expression among a racially/ethnically diverse population-based sample of 6,082 high school students. Five categories of violence victimization were assessed (felt unsafe at school, threatened or injured with a weapon at school, bullied at school, electronically bullied, and forced sexual intercourse). In 2019, the effect of violence victimization on substance use disparities was examined by calculating sex-stratified prevalence ratios by gender nonconformity, adjusted for sexual identity, race/ethnicity, and grade (adjusted prevalence ratio 1 [APR1]), and comparing these with prevalence ratios adjusted for those variables plus violence victimization (adjusted prevalence ratio 2 [APR2]).
Among female students, only being threatened or injured with a weapon was significantly (p<0.05) associated with gender nonconformity and there were no substance use disparities by gender nonconformity. Among male students, every category of violence victimization was more prevalent among gender-nonconforming than among gender-conforming students and most substance use categories demonstrated significant gender nonconformity disparities. After controlling for violence victimization, these disparities decreased but remained statistically significant for the use of cocaine (APR1=2.84 vs APR2=1.99), methamphetamine (APR1=4.47 vs APR2=2.86), heroin (APR1=4.55 vs APR2=2.96), and injection drug use (APR1=7.90 vs APR2=4.72).
School-based substance use prevention programs may benefit from strategies that support gender diversity and reduce violence victimizations experienced by gender-nonconforming students, by providing a safe and supportive school environment.
遭受暴力侵害可能有助于解释性别不一致的青年(即那些性别表达与社会期望不同的人)之间物质使用的差异。
2015 年,三个大型城市学区(加利福尼亚州的 2 个和佛罗里达州的 1 个)对基于种族/民族多样性的 6082 名高中生样本进行了一项青少年风险行为调查,其中包括对性别表达的评估。评估了五种类型的暴力受害情况(在学校感到不安全、在学校受到武器威胁或伤害、在学校受到欺凌、被电子欺凌和被迫发生性关系)。2019 年,通过计算性别不一致的性别分层患病率比,同时调整了性取向、种族/民族和年级(调整后的患病率比 1 [APR1]),并将这些比率与调整了这些变量以及暴力受害情况的患病率比(调整后的患病率比 2 [APR2])进行比较,研究了暴力受害对物质使用差异的影响。
在女学生中,只有受到武器威胁或伤害与性别不一致显著相关(p<0.05),并且性别不一致与物质使用差异无关。在男学生中,每一种类型的暴力受害在性别不一致的学生中比在性别一致的学生中更为普遍,大多数物质使用类别表现出显著的性别不一致差异。在控制了暴力受害情况后,这些差异有所减少,但仍具有统计学意义,包括可卡因的使用(APR1=2.84 与 APR2=1.99)、冰毒的使用(APR1=4.47 与 APR2=2.86)、海洛因的使用(APR1=4.55 与 APR2=2.96)和注射药物的使用(APR1=7.90 与 APR2=4.72)。
基于学校的物质使用预防计划可能受益于支持性别多样性和减少性别不一致的学生所经历的暴力受害的策略,通过提供一个安全和支持性的学校环境。