Haruta Junji, Ozone Sachiko, Goto Ryohei
Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Department of General Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Nov 19;7(4):e000202. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2019-000202. eCollection 2019.
Interprofessional collaboration is considered an important strategy in overcoming the complex issues associated with healthcare outcomes. A nationwide, community-based integrated care system developed for the care of older people in individual communities in Japan requires community hospitals to deliver integrated care to coordinate efforts for creating effective environments for health. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with the self-assessment score of interprofessional collaboration in community hospitals.
Cross-sectional study using the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS).
This study was conducted in three small community hospitals in Japan.
All healthcare staff in the hospitals via research collaborators were asked to complete the anonymous self-administered questionnaire of the AITCS comprising questions related to individual factors (age, gender, profession), hospital to which they belonged, relationships with neighbouring facilities, job burden and job satisfaction from July to October 2018. The association between the questionnaire items as explanatory variables and AITCS score as an objective variable was determined using univariate followed by multiple regression analyses.
The data from 325 of 630 participants were analysed, of whom 252 were female (77.5%) and 240 were nurses (73.8%). The mean of the total AITCS score was 117.6 (range 37-185), and the Visual Analogue Scale for relationships with neighbouring facilities, job satisfaction and job burden was 53.0 mm (0-100), 46.1 mm (0-100) and 64.3 mm (0-100), respectively. In univariate analyses of the association with AITCS score, explanatory variables with a significance level of <0.05 were relationships with neighbouring facilities, job satisfaction and job burden. On multiple regression analysis, the total AITCS score was independently associated with age, profession (nurse/non-nurse), relationships with neighbouring facilities and job satisfaction.
Better self-assessment score of interprofessional collaboration is more strongly associated with younger age, a nursing profession, better relationships with neighbouring facilities and greater job satisfaction than with the hospital to which the participant belonged. These findings may help community hospitals enhance the integration of service delivery and benefit to the community through interprofessional collaboration.
跨专业协作被视为解决与医疗保健结果相关复杂问题的一项重要策略。日本为各社区的老年人护理开发了一个全国性的、基于社区的综合护理系统,要求社区医院提供综合护理,以协调各方努力,营造有效的健康环境。本研究旨在探讨与社区医院跨专业协作自我评估得分相关的因素。
采用跨专业团队协作评估量表(AITCS)进行横断面研究。
本研究在日本的三家小型社区医院开展。
通过研究合作者邀请各医院的所有医护人员填写AITCS的匿名自填式问卷,问卷包含与个人因素(年龄、性别、职业)、所属医院、与周边机构关系、工作负担和工作满意度相关的问题,调查时间为2018年7月至10月。以问卷项目为解释变量,AITCS得分作为客观变量,先进行单因素分析,然后进行多元回归分析,确定两者之间的关联。
对630名参与者中的325人的数据进行了分析,其中252人为女性(77.5%),240人为护士(73.8%)。AITCS总分的平均值为117.6(范围37 - 185),与周边机构关系、工作满意度和工作负担的视觉模拟量表得分分别为53.0毫米(0 - 100)、46.1毫米(0 - 100)和64.3毫米(0 - 100)。在与AITCS得分关联的单因素分析中,显著性水平<0.05的解释变量为与周边机构关系、工作满意度和工作负担。多元回归分析显示,AITCS总分与年龄、职业(护士/非护士)、与周边机构关系和工作满意度独立相关。
跨专业协作的自我评估得分越高,与年龄较轻、护理职业、与周边机构关系较好以及工作满意度较高的关联更强,而与参与者所属医院的关联较弱。这些发现可能有助于社区医院通过跨专业协作加强服务提供的整合并造福社区。