Center for General Medicine Education, Keio University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Primary Care and Medical Education, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 25;14(3):e081328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081328.
The aim of this study was to explore factors associated with healthcare professionals' subjective perceptions of complex issues in primary care settings in Japan.
Cross-sectional survey conducted through a self-administered web-based questionnaire.
Japan, from June to October 2020.
Healthcare professionals recruited via an email list from the Japan Primary Care Association.
The questionnaire assessed subjective perception of satisfaction, confidence and burden regarding complex issues using a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Explanatory variables included the Japanese version of the Self-assessment Scale of Interprofessional Competency (JASSIC), basic demographic information, administrative experience and an organisational climate scale. This scale comprised the 'Plan, Do, See' (PDS) factor for management and the 'Do' factor in a leader-centred direction for those working under compulsion. Factors associated with subjective perceptions were analysed using binomial logistic regression analysis and Bonferroni analysis (p<0.017).
Data from 593 participants (average age of 41.2 years, including 133 nurses, 128 physicians and 120 social workers) were analysed. Median (quartile) VAS scores for satisfaction, confidence and burden were 50 (36-70), 52 (40-70) and 50 (30-66), respectively. Higher satisfaction group was significantly associated with PDS factor, Do factor and JASSIC Score. Greater confidence group associated with older age, male, Do factor, administrative experience and JASSIC Score. No factors were significantly associated with the higher perceived burden.
These findings reveal that interprofessional competency self-assessment influence perceptions of complex issues among healthcare professionals. Moreover, satisfaction with complex issues might be enhanced by a manageable organisational climate, while confidence might be influenced by personal attributes.
本研究旨在探讨日本基层医疗环境中医疗保健专业人员对复杂问题的主观认知相关因素。
通过在线自填式问卷调查进行的横断面研究。
日本,2020 年 6 月至 10 月。
通过日本基层医疗协会的电子邮件名单招募的医疗保健专业人员。
调查问卷采用 100mm 视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估复杂问题的满意度、信心和负担的主观感知。解释变量包括日本版的跨专业能力自评量表(JASSIC)、基本人口统计学信息、行政经验和组织氛围量表。该量表包括管理方面的“计划、执行、检查”(PDS)因素和强制性工作下以领导为中心的“执行”因素。使用二项逻辑回归分析和 Bonferroni 分析(p<0.017)分析与主观认知相关的因素。
分析了 593 名参与者(平均年龄 41.2 岁,包括 133 名护士、128 名医生和 120 名社会工作者)的数据。满意度、信心和负担的 VAS 中位数(四分位距)分别为 50(36-70)、52(40-70)和 50(30-66)。满意度较高的组与 PDS 因素、执行因素和 JASSIC 评分显著相关。信心较高的组与年龄较大、男性、执行因素、行政经验和 JASSIC 评分相关。没有因素与感知负担的增加显著相关。
这些发现表明,跨专业能力自我评估会影响医疗保健专业人员对复杂问题的认知。此外,通过管理良好的组织氛围可能会提高对复杂问题的满意度,而信心可能会受到个人属性的影响。