Metabolism, Nutrition, and Exercise Laboratory. Physical Education and Sport Center, Londrina State University, Londrina, Brazil.
Exercise Science Program, Truman State University, Kirksville, USA.
Sports Med. 2021 Jun;51(6):1171-1178. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01449-2. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Calculating resistance-training volume in programs focused on muscle hypertrophy is an attempt to quantify the external workload carried out, then to estimate the dose of stimulus imposed on targeted muscles. The volume is usually expressed in some variables that directly affected the total training work, such as the number of sets, repetitions, and volume-load. These variables are used to try to quantify the training work easily, for the subsequent organization and prescription of training programs. One of the main uses of measures of volume quantification is seen in studies in which the purpose is to compare the effects of different training protocols on muscle growth in a volume-equated format. However, it seems that not all measures of volume are always appropriate for equating training protocols. In the current paper, it is discussed what training volume is and the potentials and shortcomings of each one of the most common ways to equate it between groups depending on the independent variable to be compared (e.g., weekly frequency, intensity of load, and advanced techniques).
计算以肌肉肥大为目标的抗阻训练计划的训练量是尝试量化所执行的外部工作量,然后估计施加到目标肌肉的刺激剂量。该训练量通常用一些直接影响总训练工作量的变量来表示,如组数、重复次数和容量负荷。这些变量被用来尝试量化训练工作量,以便后续组织和制定训练计划。在旨在比较不同训练方案对肌肉生长的影响的研究中,体积量化测量的主要用途之一是在以体积等效的方式进行比较。然而,似乎并非所有的训练量测量方法都始终适用于在组间进行训练方案的等效化。在当前的论文中,讨论了训练量是什么,以及根据要比较的自变量(例如每周频率、负荷强度和高级技术),在组间对其进行等效化的最常见方法中的每一种方法的潜力和缺点。