Khor E Q, Lim J P, Tay L, Yeo A, Yew S, Ding Y Y, Lim W S
Ezra Qi-En Khor, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Email address:
J Frailty Aging. 2020;9(1):37-43. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2019.28.
Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is associated with poorer physical performance in the elderly and will increase in relevance with population ageing and the obesity epidemic. The lack of a consensus definition for SO has resulted in variability in its reported prevalence, poor inter-definitional agreement, and disagreement on its impact on physical performance, impeding further development in the field. While sarcopenia definitions have been compared, the impact of obesity definitions in SO has been less well-studied.
To compare 3 widely-adopted definitions of obesity in terms of SO prevalence, inter-definitional agreement, and association with muscle function.
Cross-sectional.
GERILABS study, Singapore Participants: 200 community-dwelling, functionally-independent older adults.
We utilized three commonly-used definitions of obesity: body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and DXA-derived fat mass percentage (FM%). Sarcopenia was defined using Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria. For muscle function, we assessed handgrip strength, gait speed and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Subjects were classified into 4 body composition phenotypes (normal, obese, sarcopenic and SO), and outcomes were compared between groups.
The prevalence rate for SO was lowest for BMI (0.5%) compared to FM% (10.0%) and WC (10.5%). Inter-definitional agreement was lowest between BMI and WC (κ=0.364), and at best moderate between FM% and WC (κ=0.583). SO performed the worst amongst body composition phenotypes in handgrip strength, gait speed and SPPB (all p<0.01) only when defined using WC. In regression analyses, SO was associated with decreased SPPB scores (β=-0.261, p=0.001) only for the WC definition.
There is large variation in the prevalence of SO across different obesity definitions, with low-to-moderate agreement between them. Our results corroborate recent evidence that WC, and thus central obesity, is best associated with poorer muscle function in SO. Thus, WC should be further explored in defining obesity for accurate and early characterization of SO among older adults in Asian populations.
肌少性肥胖(SO)与老年人较差的身体机能相关,且随着人口老龄化和肥胖流行,其相关性将增加。SO缺乏共识定义导致其报告患病率存在差异、定义间一致性差以及对其对身体机能影响的看法不一,阻碍了该领域的进一步发展。虽然已对肌少症的定义进行了比较,但肥胖定义在SO中的影响研究较少。
比较3种广泛采用的肥胖定义在SO患病率、定义间一致性以及与肌肉功能关联方面的差异。
横断面研究。
新加坡GERILABS研究
200名居住在社区、功能独立的老年人。
我们采用了三种常用的肥胖定义:体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)和双能X线吸收法得出的脂肪质量百分比(FM%)。肌少症采用亚洲肌少症工作组标准进行定义。对于肌肉功能,我们评估了握力、步速和简短体能状况量表(SPPB)。将受试者分为4种身体成分表型(正常、肥胖、肌少症和SO),并比较组间结果。
与FM%(10.0%)和WC(10.5%)相比,BMI定义的SO患病率最低(0.5%)。BMI和WC之间的定义间一致性最低(κ=0.364),FM%和WC之间的一致性充其量为中等(κ=0.583)。仅在使用WC定义时,SO在握力、步速和SPPB方面的身体成分表型中表现最差(所有p<0.01)。在回归分析中,仅对于WC定义,SO与SPPB得分降低相关(β=-0.261,p=0.001)。
不同肥胖定义下SO的患病率差异很大,它们之间的一致性为低到中等。我们的结果证实了最近的证据,即WC以及由此产生的中心性肥胖与SO中较差的肌肉功能最相关。因此,在为亚洲人群中老年人准确早期识别SO定义肥胖时,应进一步探索WC。