Heseltine D, Bramble M G
Middlesbrough General Hospital, England.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1988;11(4):232-5. doi: 10.1185/03007998809114241.
Seventy frail elderly patients attending a day hospital were studied to investigate the incidence of postural hypotension in control patients on no diuretic treatment (n = 30), patients on loop diuretics (frusemide) for mild cardiac failure (n = 20) and patients on thiazide diuretics for mild cardiac failure (n = 20). The results showed that patients on thiazide diuretics had a higher incidence of postural hypotension (reduction in systolic blood pressure greater than 20 mmHg on standing after 2 minutes) than patients on loop diuretics (12 out of 20 vs 4 out of 20, p less than 0.05). Mean plasma potassium levels were lower in the thiazide group than in the frusemide group (p less than 0.05) and this correlated significantly with change in systolic blood pressure from supine to standing position (r = -0.56, p less than 0.01). These findings indicate that a loop diuretic (frusemide) is as safe if not safer than thiazides in older patients and the latter have an unjustified reputation of being safer first-line drugs for the treatment of cardiac failure.
对70名日间医院的体弱老年患者进行了研究,以调查未接受利尿剂治疗的对照患者(n = 30)、因轻度心力衰竭接受襻利尿剂(速尿)治疗的患者(n = 20)以及因轻度心力衰竭接受噻嗪类利尿剂治疗的患者(n = 20)中体位性低血压的发生率。结果显示,噻嗪类利尿剂治疗的患者体位性低血压发生率(站立2分钟后收缩压下降大于20 mmHg)高于襻利尿剂治疗的患者(20例中有12例 vs 20例中有4例,p < 0.05)。噻嗪类组的平均血浆钾水平低于速尿组(p < 0.05),且这与仰卧位到站立位收缩压的变化显著相关(r = -0.56,p < 0.01)。这些发现表明,在老年患者中,襻利尿剂(速尿)即便不比噻嗪类药物更安全,至少也是同样安全的,而噻嗪类药物作为治疗心力衰竭的一线药物,享有更安全的不合理声誉。