Bauer Thomas W, Behling Cynthia, Miller Dylan V, Chang Bernard S, Viktorova Elena, Magari Robert, Jensen Perry E, Wharton Keith A, Qiu Jinsong
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Pacific Rim Pathology, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Pathol Inform. 2020 Feb 6;11:3. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_47_19. eCollection 2020.
Previous studies have demonstrated the noninferiority of pathologists' interpretation of whole slide images (WSIs) compared to microscopic slides in diagnostic surgical pathology; however, to our knowledge, no published studies have tested analytical precision of an entire WSI system.
In this study, five pathologists at three locations tested intra-system, inter-system/site, and intra- and inter-pathologist precision of the Aperio AT2 DX System (Leica Biosystems, Vista, CA, USA). Sixty-nine microscopic slides containing 23 different morphologic features suggested by the Digital Pathology Association as important to diagnostic pathology were identified and scanned. Each of 202 unique fields of view (FOVs) had 1-3 defined morphologic features, and each feature was represented in three different tissues. For intra-system precision, each site scanned 23 slides at three different times and one pathologist interpreted all FOVs. For inter-system/site precision, all 69 slides were scanned once at each of three sites, and FOVs from each site were read by one pathologist. To test intra- and inter-pathologist precision, all 69 slides were scanned at one site, FOVs were saved in three different orientations, and the FOVs were transferred to a different site. Three different pathologists then interpreted FOVs from all 69 slides. Wildcard (unscored) slides and washout intervals were included in each study. Agreement estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Combined precision from all three studies, representing 606 FOVs in each of the three studies, showed overall intra-system agreement of 97.9%; inter-system/site agreement was 96%, intra-pathologist agreement was 95%, and inter-pathologist agreement was 94.2%.
Pathologists using the Aperio AT2 DX System identified histopathological features with high precision, providing increased confidence in using WSI for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology.
以往研究已证明,在诊断性外科病理学中,与显微镜载玻片相比,病理学家对全切片图像(WSIs)的解读具有非劣效性;然而,据我们所知,尚无已发表的研究测试过整个WSI系统的分析精度。
在本研究中,来自三个地点的五位病理学家测试了Aperio AT2 DX系统(徕卡生物系统公司,美国加利福尼亚州维斯塔)的系统内、系统间/地点间以及病理学家内和病理学家间的精度。识别并扫描了69张显微镜载玻片,这些载玻片包含数字病理协会建议的对诊断病理学重要的23种不同形态学特征。202个独特视野(FOV)中的每一个都有1 - 3种定义的形态学特征,并且每种特征在三种不同组织中呈现。对于系统内精度,每个地点在三个不同时间扫描23张载玻片,由一位病理学家解读所有FOV。对于系统间/地点间精度,在三个地点的每一个都对所有69张载玻片扫描一次,每个地点的FOV由一位病理学家读取。为了测试病理学家内和病理学家间的精度,在一个地点扫描所有69张载玻片,FOV以三种不同方向保存,并将FOV转移到另一个地点。然后由三位不同的病理学家解读所有69张载玻片的FOV。每项研究都纳入了通配符(未评分)载玻片和冲洗间隔。计算了具有95%置信区间的一致性估计值。
所有三项研究的综合精度,每项研究代表606个FOV,显示系统内总体一致性为97.9%;系统间/地点间一致性为96%,病理学家内一致性为95%,病理学家间一致性为94.2%。
使用Aperio AT2 DX系统的病理学家能够高精度地识别组织病理学特征,这为在外科病理学中使用WSI进行初步诊断提供了更高的信心。