Suppr超能文献

一项多中心研究,旨在评估病理学家使用Aperio GT 450 DX的分析精度。

A multicenter study to evaluate the analytical precision by pathologists using the Aperio GT 450 DX.

作者信息

Bauer Thomas W, Hanna Matthew G, Smith Kelly D, Sirintrapun S Joseph, Hameed Meera R, Reddi Deepti, Chang Bernard S, Ardon Orly, Zhou Xiaozhi, Lewis Jenny V, Dayal Shubham, Chiweshe Joseph, Ferber David, Sutcu Aysegul Ergin, White Michael

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, United States of America.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

J Pathol Inform. 2024 Oct 9;15:100401. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100401. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital pathology systems (DPS) are emerging as capable technologies for clinical practice. Studies have analyzed pathologists' diagnostic concordance by comparing reviews of whole slide images (WSIs) to glass slides (e.g., accuracy). This observational study evaluated the reproducibility of pathologists' diagnostic reviews using the Aperio GT 450 DX under slightly different conditions (precision).

METHOD

Diagnostic precision was tested in three conditions: intra-system (within systems), inter-system/site (between systems/sites), and intra- and inter-pathologist (within and between pathologists). A total of five study/reading pathologists (one pathologist each for intra-system, inter-system/site, and three for intra-pathologist/inter-pathologist analyses) were assigned to the respective sub-studies.A panel of 69 glass slides with 23 unique histological features was used to evaluate the WSI system's precision. Each glass slide was scanned to generate a unique WSI. From each WSI, the field of view (FOV) was generated (at least 2 FOVs/WSI), which included the selected features (1-3 features/FOV). Each pathologist reviewed the digital slides and identified which morphological features, if any, were present in each defined FOV. To minimize recall bias, an additional 12 wild card slides from different organ types were used for which FOVs were extracted. The pathologists also read these wild card slides FOVs; however, the corresponding feature identification was not included in the final data analysis.

RESULTS

Each measured endpoint met the pre-defined acceptance criteria of the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) overall agreement (OA) rate being ≥85% for each sub-study. The lower bound of the 95% CI for the intra-system OA rate was 95.8%; for inter-system analysis, it was 94.9%; for intra-pathologist analysis, 92.4%, whereas for inter-pathologist analyses, the lower bound of the 95% CI of the OA was 90.6%.

CONCLUSION

The study results indicate that pathologists using the Aperio GT 450 DX WSI system can precisely identify histological features that may be required for accurately diagnosing anatomic pathology cases.

摘要

背景

数字病理系统(DPS)正在成为临床实践中可行的技术。研究通过比较全玻片图像(WSI)与玻璃切片的阅片结果(如准确性)来分析病理学家的诊断一致性。这项观察性研究评估了在略有不同的条件下使用Aperio GT 450 DX时病理学家诊断阅片的可重复性(精确性)。

方法

在三种条件下测试诊断精确性:系统内(在系统内部)、系统间/地点间(在系统/地点之间)以及病理学家内部和病理学家之间(在病理学家内部和之间)。总共五名研究/阅片病理学家(系统内一名、系统间/地点间一名,病理学家内部/病理学家之间分析三名)被分配到各自的子研究中。使用一组包含23种独特组织学特征的69张玻璃切片来评估WSI系统的精确性。每张玻璃切片都进行扫描以生成独特的WSI。从每个WSI中生成视野(FOV)(每个WSI至少2个FOV),其中包括选定的特征(每个FOV 1 - 3个特征)。每位病理学家阅片并确定每个定义的FOV中存在哪些形态学特征(如果有的话)。为了尽量减少回忆偏倚,使用了另外12张来自不同器官类型的通配符切片并从中提取FOV。病理学家也阅这些通配符切片的FOV;然而,相应的特征识别不包括在最终数据分析中。

结果

每个测量终点均达到了预先定义的接受标准,即每个子研究的95%置信区间(CI)总体一致性(OA)率下限≥85%。系统内OA率的95% CI下限为95.8%;系统间分析为94.9%;病理学家内部分析为92.4%,而病理学家之间分析的OA的95% CI下限为90.6%。

结论

研究结果表明,使用Aperio GT 450 DX WSI系统的病理学家能够精确识别准确诊断解剖病理学病例可能所需的组织学特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785a/11600015/be46aa1d8204/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验