Suppr超能文献

医疗保险医师价值导向支付调整计划中实践层面社会和医疗风险与绩效的关联

Association of Practice-Level Social and Medical Risk With Performance in the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program.

作者信息

Chen Lena M, Epstein Arnold M, Orav E John, Filice Clara E, Samson Lok Wong, Joynt Maddox Karen E

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor2Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor3Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor4Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts6Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):453-461. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9643.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Medicare recently launched the Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier (PVBM) Program, a mandatory pay-for-performance program for physician practices. Little is known about performance by practices that serve socially or medically high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare performance in the PVBM Program by practice characteristics.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional observational study using PVBM Program data for payments made in 2015 based on performance of large US physician practices caring for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2013.

EXPOSURES

High social risk (defined as practices in the top quartile of proportion of patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid) and high medical risk (defined as practices in the top quartile of mean Hierarchical Condition Category risk score among fee-for-service beneficiaries).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Quality and cost z scores based on a composite of individual measures. Higher z scores reflect better performance on quality; lower scores, better performance on costs.

RESULTS

Among 899 physician practices with 5 189 880 beneficiaries, 547 practices were categorized as low risk (neither high social nor high medical risk) (mean, 7909 beneficiaries; mean, 320 clinicians), 128 were high medical risk only (mean, 3675 beneficiaries; mean, 370 clinicians), 102 were high social risk only (mean, 1635 beneficiaries; mean, 284 clinicians), and 122 were high medical and social risk (mean, 1858 beneficiaries; mean, 269 clinicians). Practices categorized as low risk performed the best on the composite quality score (z score, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.28]) compared with each of the practices categorized as high risk (high medical risk only: z score, -0.55 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.32]; high social risk only: z score, -0.86 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.54]; and high medical and social risk: -0.78 [95% CI, -1.04 to -0.51]) (P < .001 across groups). Practices categorized as high social risk only performed the best on the composite cost score (z score, -0.52 [95% CI, -0.71 to -0.33]), low risk had the next best cost score (z score, -0.18 [95% CI, -0.25 to -0.10]), then high medical and social risk (z score, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.57]), and then high medical risk only (z score, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.99]) (P < .001 across groups). Total per capita costs were $9506 for practices categorized as low risk, $13 683 for high medical risk only, $8214 for high social risk only, and $11 692 for high medical and social risk. These patterns were associated with fewer bonuses and more penalties for high-risk practices.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

During the first year of the Medicare Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier Program, physician practices that served more socially high-risk patients had lower quality and lower costs, and practices that served more medically high-risk patients had lower quality and higher costs.

摘要

重要性

医疗保险最近推出了医生基于价值的支付调整(PVBM)计划,这是一项针对医生执业机构的强制性按绩效付费计划。对于服务于社会或医疗高风险患者的执业机构的绩效,人们了解甚少。

目的

按执业特征比较PVBM计划中的绩效。

设计、设置和参与者:横断面观察性研究,使用PVBM计划中2015年基于2013年为按服务收费的医疗保险受益人的美国大型医生执业机构绩效所进行支付的数据。

暴露因素

高社会风险(定义为同时符合医疗保险和医疗补助资格的患者比例处于前四分位数的执业机构)和高医疗风险(定义为按服务收费受益人中平均分层条件类别风险评分处于前四分位数的执业机构)。

主要结局和测量指标

基于个体测量指标综合得出的质量和成本z分数。z分数越高表明质量表现越好;分数越低表明成本表现越好。

结果

在899个拥有5189880名受益人的医生执业机构中(平均每家机构拥有7909名受益人,平均每家机构拥有320名临床医生),547个执业机构被归类为低风险(既非高社会风险也非高医疗风险),128个仅为高医疗风险(平均每家机构拥有3675名受益人,平均每家机构拥有370名临床医生),102个仅为高社会风险(平均每家机构拥有1635名受益人,平均每家机构拥有284名临床医生),122个为高医疗和高社会风险(平均每家机构拥有1858名受益人,平均每家机构拥有269名临床医生)。与各高风险类别执业机构相比,归类为低风险的执业机构在综合质量评分方面表现最佳(z分数为0.18[95%置信区间为0.09至0.28])(仅高医疗风险:z分数为 -0.55[95%置信区间为 -0.77至 -0.32];仅高社会风险:z分数为 -0.86[95%置信区间为 -1.17至 -0.54];高医疗和高社会风险:-0.78[95%置信区间为 -//1.04至 -0.51])(各组间P < 0.001)。仅归类为高社会风险的执业机构在综合成本评分方面表现最佳(z分数为 -0.52[95%置信区间为 -0.71至 -0.33]),低风险的执业机构成本评分次之(z分数为 -0.18[95%置信区间为 -0.25至 -0.10]),然后是高医疗和高社会风险(z分数为0.40[95%置信区间为0.23至0.57]),最后是仅高医疗风险(z分数为0.82[95%置信区间为0.65至0.99])(各组间P < 0.001)。归类为低风险的执业机构人均总成本为9506美元,仅高医疗风险的执业机构为13683美元,仅高社会风险的执业机构为8214美元,高医疗和高社会风险的执业机构为11692美元。这些模式与高风险执业机构获得的奖金较少和受到的处罚较多相关。

结论与意义

在医疗保险医生基于价值的支付调整计划的第一年,服务于社会高风险患者较多的医生执业机构质量较低但成本也较低,而服务于医疗高风险患者较多的执业机构质量较低但成本较高。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.综合初级保健倡议的两年成本和质量。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2345-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1414953. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Quality of Health Care.卫生保健质量中的种族和民族差异。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:375-94. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021439. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
9
Thirty-Day Readmission Rates Among Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.双重资格受益人的30天再入院率。
J Rural Health. 2016 Spring;32(2):188-95. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12140. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验