• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让患者参与护理(EPIC):心脏功能和心脏移植特定患者参与的框架。

Engaging Patients in Care (EPIC): A Framework for Heart Function and Heart Transplant-Specific Patient Engagement.

作者信息

Macklin Jillian A, Djihanian Natalie, Killackey Tieghan, MacIver Jane

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Co-Chair HeartLinks, Patient Support Group, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2019 Mar 29;1(2):43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2019.01.002
PMID:32159082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7063628/
Abstract

ngaging atients n are (EPIC) is a local patient engagement initiative at the University Health Network for patients and families who have received care for heart failure, heart transplant, or mechanical circulatory support (left ventricular assist device). Patients and caregivers can engage at 4 different levels, including sharing, consulting, deliberating, and collaborating, depending on their knowledge, experience, and available time. The Engaging Patients In Care framework has 4 priority areas: Care Delivery and Policy, Patient Advocacy, Peer Support, and Research. We have identified key engagement barriers with a discussion of possible solutions. We hope this framework can be adapted as an evidentiary baseline for other heart failure and transplant institutions across Canada.

摘要

让患者参与护理(EPIC)是大学健康网络针对心力衰竭、心脏移植或机械循环支持(左心室辅助装置)患者及其家属开展的一项本地患者参与倡议。患者和护理人员可以根据他们的知识、经验和可用时间,在4个不同层面参与,包括分享、咨询、审议和协作。让患者参与护理框架有4个优先领域:护理提供与政策、患者倡导、同伴支持和研究。我们确定了关键的参与障碍,并讨论了可能的解决方案。我们希望这个框架可以作为加拿大其他心力衰竭和移植机构的证据基线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3121/7063628/e4faedcf1e01/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3121/7063628/e4faedcf1e01/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3121/7063628/e4faedcf1e01/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Engaging Patients in Care (EPIC): A Framework for Heart Function and Heart Transplant-Specific Patient Engagement.让患者参与护理(EPIC):心脏功能和心脏移植特定患者参与的框架。
CJC Open. 2019 Mar 29;1(2):43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2019.01.002. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS): first annual report.欧洲机械循环支持患者注册登记处(EUROMACS):首份年度报告。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 May;47(5):770-6; discussion 776-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv096. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
3
Incidence of temporary mechanical circulatory support before heart transplantation and impact on post-transplant outcomes.心脏移植前临时机械循环支持的发生率及其对移植后结局的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Sep;37(9):1060-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
4
Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.在当前接受连续流左心室辅助装置的患者中,心脏移植后的存活率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Giving voice to older adults living with frailty and their family caregivers: engagement of older adults living with frailty in research, health care decision making, and in health policy.倾听体弱老年人及其家庭照顾者的声音:让体弱老年人参与研究、医疗保健决策和卫生政策制定。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jun 17;2:23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0038-7. eCollection 2016.
7
Client and family engagement in rehabilitation research: a framework for health care organizations.客户及家属参与康复研究:医疗保健组织的框架
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Apr;40(7):859-863. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1276973. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
8
Outcomes of children implanted with ventricular assist devices in the United States: First analysis of the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS).美国植入心室辅助装置儿童的治疗结果:机械循环支持儿科跨机构注册研究(PediMACS)的首次分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 May;35(5):578-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.1227. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
9
Clinical experience with temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support.临时右心室机械循环支持的临床经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;156(5):1885-1891. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.04.094. Epub 2018 May 1.
10
Engaging Women With Lived Experience: A Novel Cross-Canada Approach.让有实际经验的女性参与进来:一种全新的加拿大全国性方法。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Apr 13;8:23743735211008300. doi: 10.1177/23743735211008300. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting the continuous development and use of a patient partnership framework in European rare disease networks (ERNs): a scoping review of frameworks in the scientific literature.支持欧洲罕见病网络(ERNs)中患者伙伴关系框架的持续发展与应用:对科学文献中框架的范围综述
J Community Genet. 2025 Feb;16(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00763-2. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
2
Exploring patient perspectives on how they can and should be engaged in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in health care.探讨患者对如何以及应该参与医疗人工智能(AI)应用开发的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 26;23(1):1163. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10098-2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Need for Heart Failure Advocacy in Canada.加拿大对心力衰竭宣传的需求。
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Nov;33(11):1450-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
A framework for public involvement at the design stage of NHS health and social care research: time to develop ethically conscious standards.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)健康与社会护理研究设计阶段的公众参与框架:制定具有道德意识的标准的时候到了。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Apr 4;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0058-y. eCollection 2017.
3
Moving towards a more inclusive patient and public involvement in health research paradigm: the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis.
Caregiver Burden in Adult Solid Organ Transplantation.
成人实体器官移植中的照护者负担。
Transplantation. 2023 Jul 1;107(7):1482-1491. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004477. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
迈向更具包容性的患者和公众参与健康研究范式:纳入创伤知情的交叉性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2463-1.
4
The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Companion: Bridging Guidelines to Your Practice.《加拿大心血管学会心力衰竭指南手册:将指南与临床实践相结合》
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Mar;32(3):296-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
5
Supporting quality public and patient engagement in health system organizations: development and usability testing of the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool.支持卫生系统组织中高质量的公众和患者参与:公众与患者参与评估工具的开发与可用性测试
Health Expect. 2016 Aug;19(4):817-27. doi: 10.1111/hex.12378. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
6
Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial.让患者参与医疗保健改进的优先级设定:一项集群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 20;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-24.
7
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.患者和家属参与:理解要素、制定干预措施和政策的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
8
Building the business case for patient-centered care.构建以患者为中心的医疗服务的商业案例。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2008 Mar;62(3):80-5.
9
Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients.告知、教育患者并让患者参与其中的策略的有效性。
BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):24-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39246.581169.80.