Department of Psychology: Psychological Methods Groups, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 15906, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychometrika. 2020 Mar;85(1):206-231. doi: 10.1007/s11336-020-09697-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
Researchers in the field of network psychometrics often focus on the estimation of Gaussian graphical models (GGMs)-an undirected network model of partial correlations-between observed variables of cross-sectional data or single-subject time-series data. This assumes that all variables are measured without measurement error, which may be implausible. In addition, cross-sectional data cannot distinguish between within-subject and between-subject effects. This paper provides a general framework that extends GGM modeling with latent variables, including relationships over time. These relationships can be estimated from time-series data or panel data featuring at least three waves of measurement. The model takes the form of a graphical vector-autoregression model between latent variables and is termed the ts-lvgvar when estimated from time-series data and the panel-lvgvar when estimated from panel data. These methods have been implemented in the software package psychonetrics, which is exemplified in two empirical examples, one using time-series data and one using panel data, and evaluated in two large-scale simulation studies. The paper concludes with a discussion on ergodicity and generalizability. Although within-subject effects may in principle be separated from between-subject effects, the interpretation of these results rests on the intensity and the time interval of measurement and on the plausibility of the assumption of stationarity.
网络心理计量学领域的研究人员通常专注于高斯图形模型(GGM)的估计-一种横截面数据或单主体时间序列数据中观测变量的无向网络模型,部分相关。这假设所有变量都是在没有测量误差的情况下测量的,但这可能不太可信。此外,横截面数据无法区分主体内和主体间的效应。本文提供了一个通用框架,通过潜在变量扩展了 GGM 建模,包括随时间的关系。这些关系可以从具有至少三个测量波的时间序列数据或面板数据中进行估计。该模型在潜在变量之间形成图形向量自回归模型,当从时间序列数据估计时称为 ts-lvgvar,当从面板数据估计时称为面板-lvgvar。这些方法已经在 psychonetrics 软件包中实现,该软件包在两个实证示例中得到了例证,一个使用时间序列数据,一个使用面板数据,并在两个大规模模拟研究中进行了评估。本文最后讨论了遍历性和可推广性。虽然主体内效应原则上可以与主体间效应分离,但这些结果的解释取决于测量的强度和时间间隔,以及平稳性假设的合理性。