• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在印度,接受高质量分娩护理是否需要付费?贿赂与分娩期间护理质量自付支出之间的关联。

Do you need to pay for quality care? Associations between bribes and out-of-pocket expenditures on quality of care during childbirth in India.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Drive South, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Institute for Global Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Mission Hall, Box 1224, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2020 Jun 1;35(5):600-608. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa008.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czaa008
PMID:32163567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8453422/
Abstract

While it is mandated that reproductive and child health services be provided for free at public facilities in India, qualitative evidence suggests it is common for facilities to request bribes and other informal payments for medicines, medical tests or equipment. This article examines the prevalence of bribe requests, total out-of-pocket expenditures (OOPEs) and associations between bribe requests and total OOPEs on the experience of quality of care and maternal complications during childbirth. Women who delivered in public facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India were administered a survey on sociodemographic characteristics, bribe requests, total OOPEs, types of health checks received and experience of maternal complications. Data were analysed using descriptive, bivariate and multivariate statistics. Among the 2018 women who completed the survey, 43% were asked to pay a bribe and 73% incurred OOPEs. Bribe requests were associated with lower odds of receiving all health checks upon arrival to the facility (aOR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24-0.98) and during labour and delivery (aOR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25-0.76), lower odds of receiving most or all health checks after delivery (aOR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.62) and higher odds of experiencing maternal complications (aOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.13-1.87). Although it is mandated that maternity care be provided for free in public facilities in India, these findings suggest that OOPEs are high, and bribes/tips contribute significantly. Interventions centred on improving person-centred care (particularly guidelines around bribes), health system conditions and women's expectations of care are needed.

摘要

虽然印度的公共设施必须免费提供生殖和儿童健康服务,但定性证据表明,设施经常要求贿赂和其他非正式支付药品、医疗检查或设备费用。本文研究了在印度北方邦,公共设施中,请求贿赂、总自付支出(OOPE)以及贿赂请求与总 OOPE 与分娩期间的护理质量和产妇并发症之间的关联。对在印度北方邦公共设施分娩的妇女进行了一项关于社会人口特征、贿赂请求、总 OOPE、接受的健康检查类型和产妇并发症经历的调查。使用描述性、双变量和多变量统计方法分析数据。在完成调查的 2018 名妇女中,有 43%的人被要求支付贿赂,73%的人产生了 OOPE。请求贿赂与以下情况的可能性降低相关:到达设施时接受所有健康检查(优势比 [aOR] = 0.49;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.24-0.98)和分娩期间(aOR = 0.44;95%CI:0.25-0.76),接受大部分或全部健康检查后(aOR = 0.44;95%CI:0.31-0.62)的可能性较低,以及经历产妇并发症的可能性较高(aOR = 1.45;95%CI:1.13-1.87)。尽管印度的公共设施规定必须免费提供产妇护理,但这些发现表明 OOPE 很高,贿赂/小费贡献很大。需要以改善以人为本的护理(特别是围绕贿赂的准则)、卫生系统条件和妇女对护理的期望为中心的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Do you need to pay for quality care? Associations between bribes and out-of-pocket expenditures on quality of care during childbirth in India.在印度,接受高质量分娩护理是否需要付费?贿赂与分娩期间护理质量自付支出之间的关联。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Jun 1;35(5):600-608. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa008.
2
Out of pocket expenditure to deliver at public health facilities in India: a cross sectional analysis.印度在公共卫生设施分娩的自付费用:一项横断面分析。
Reprod Health. 2016 Aug 24;13(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0221-1.
3
Do women's perspectives of quality of care during childbirth match with those of providers? A qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh, India.分娩期间女性对护理质量的看法与医护人员的看法相符吗?印度北方邦的一项定性研究。
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1527971. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1527971.
4
Discordance in self-report and observation data on mistreatment of women by providers during childbirth in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦提供方在分娩期间虐待产妇的自我报告和观察数据的不一致性。
Reprod Health. 2017 Nov 15;14(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0409-z.
5
Cashless childbirth, but at a cost: A grounded theory study on quality of intrapartum care in public health facilities in India.无现金分娩,但有代价:一项关于印度公共卫生设施中分娩期护理质量的扎根理论研究。
Midwifery. 2016 Aug;39:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.012. Epub 2016 May 4.
6
Investigating the nature of competition facing private healthcare facilities: the case of maternity care in Uttar Pradesh, India.调查私立医疗机构面临的竞争性质:以印度北方邦的产妇护理为例。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jul 1;34(6):450-460. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz056.
7
An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study.印度北方邦产妇保健机构中分娩和生育期间虐待妇女的调查:混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 23;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0668-y.
8
Is quality of care during childbirth consistent from admission to discharge? A qualitative study of delivery care in Uttar Pradesh, India.分娩期间的护理质量从入院到出院是否一致?印度北方邦分娩护理的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204607. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204607. eCollection 2018.
9
"Neither we are satisfied nor they"-users and provider's perspective: a qualitative study of maternity care in secondary level public health facilities, Uttar Pradesh, India.“我们和他们都不满意”——用户与提供者的视角:对印度北方邦二级公共卫生设施中孕产妇护理的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 27;15:421. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1077-8.
10
Out-of-pocket expenditures for childbirth in the context of the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) cash transfer program to promote facility births: who pays and how much? Studies from Madhya Pradesh, India.在印度中央邦实施的旨在促进机构分娩的“贾纳尼·苏拉卡莎·尤佳娜”(JSY)现金转移计划背景下的分娩自付费用:谁来支付以及支付多少?相关研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 May 3;15:71. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0362-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Financing for equity for women's, children's and adolescents' health in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.低收入和中等收入国家妇女、儿童及青少年卫生领域的公平筹资:一项范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 12;4(9):e0003573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003573. eCollection 2024.
2
Is there an association between out-of-pocket hospital costs, quality and care outcomes? A systematic review of contemporary evidence.自付医院费用与质量和护理结果之间是否存在关联?当代证据的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 13;23(1):984. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09941-3.
3
Predicting health services utilization using a score of perceived barriers to medical care: evidence from rural Senegal.利用感知医疗障碍评分预测卫生服务利用情况:来自塞内加尔农村的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 16;23(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09192-2.
4
The economic toll of COVID-19: A cohort study of prevalence and economic factors associated with postpartum depression in Kenya.COVID-19 对经济的影响:肯尼亚一项队列研究显示,产后抑郁症与流行状况和经济因素有关。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jul;158(1):110-115. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14142. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
5
Institutional deliveries in India's nine low performing states: levels, determinants and accessibility.印度九个表现不佳的邦的机构分娩情况:水平、决定因素和可及性。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):2001145. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2001145.
6
Neonatal care practices need to be further explored - Authors' reply.
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jun;9(6):e754. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00095-4.
7
Understanding disparities in person-centred maternity care: the potential role of provider implicit and explicit bias.理解以产妇为中心的护理中的差异:提供者隐性和显性偏见的潜在作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Apr 21;36(3):298-311. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa190.
8
A comparison of intensive vs. light-touch quality improvement interventions for maternal health in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦针对孕产妇健康的强化与轻触式质量改进干预措施的比较
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):1121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05960-6.

本文引用的文献

1
How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys.在四个国家中,医疗机构分娩期间女性的待遇:一项带有分娩观察和社区调查的横断面研究。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 9;394(10210):1750-1763. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
2
Patient-experience during delivery in public health facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦公立卫生机构的分娩体验。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(8):574-581. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz067.
3
Development of a tool to measure person-centered maternity care in developing settings: validation in a rural and urban Kenyan population.开发一种工具来衡量发展中环境下以人为主的孕产护理:在肯尼亚城乡人群中的验证。
Reprod Health. 2017 Sep 22;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0381-7.
4
Associations Between Mistreatment by a Provider during Childbirth and Maternal Health Complications in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦分娩期间医护人员虐待行为与孕产妇健康并发症之间的关联
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Sep;21(9):1821-1833. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2298-8.
5
Manifestations and drivers of mistreatment of women during childbirth in Kenya: implications for measurement and developing interventions.肯尼亚分娩期间妇女受虐待的表现及驱动因素:对测量和制定干预措施的影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 28;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1288-6.
6
A qualitative study of factors impacting accessing of institutional delivery care in the context of India's cash incentive program.印度现金激励计划背景下影响机构分娩服务获取的因素定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Apr;178:55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.059. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
7
Perceptions and experiences of the mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities in Guinea: a qualitative study with women and service providers.几内亚医疗机构中分娩期间妇女遭受虐待的认知与经历:一项针对妇女和服务提供者的定性研究
Reprod Health. 2017 Jan 11;14(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0266-1.
8
Women's status and experiences of mistreatment during childbirth in Uttar Pradesh: a mixed methods study using cultural health capital theory.印度北方邦妇女在分娩期间的地位及受虐经历:一项运用文化健康资本理论的混合方法研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1124-4.
9
Decision-making for delivery location and quality of care among slum-dwellers: a qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦贫民窟居民分娩地点及医疗服务质量的决策:一项定性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 7;16:148. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0942-8.
10
The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.全球医疗机构中分娩期间对妇女的虐待:一项混合方法的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2015 Jun 30;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. eCollection 2015 Jun.