• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Promoting and supporting credibility in neuroscience.

作者信息

Rousselet Guillaume A, Hazell Georgina, Cooke Anne, Dalley Jeffrey W

机构信息

Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

British Neuroscience Association, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Brain Neurosci Adv. 2019 Apr 10;3:2398212819844167. doi: 10.1177/2398212819844167. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2398212819844167
PMID:32166181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7058234/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Promoting and supporting credibility in neuroscience.提升并支持神经科学领域的可信度。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2019 Apr 10;3:2398212819844167. doi: 10.1177/2398212819844167. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
2
Lifting the lid on impact and peer review.揭开影响与同行评审的面纱。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2021 Apr 11;5:23982128211006574. doi: 10.1177/23982128211006574. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
Credibility, Replicability, and Reproducibility in Simulation for Biomedicine and Clinical Applications in Neuroscience.生物医学模拟与神经科学临床应用中的可信度、可重复性和再现性
Front Neuroinform. 2018 Apr 16;12:18. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00018. eCollection 2018.
4
Non-green influencers promoting sustainable consumption: Dynamic norms enhance the credibility of authentic pro-environmental posts.非绿色领域有影响力者推动可持续消费：动态规范增强真实亲环境帖子的可信度。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1112762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1112762. eCollection 2023.
5
Development of the FDA Tobacco Credibility Scale (FDA-TCS).美国食品药品监督管理局烟草可信度量表（FDA-TCS）的开发。
Tob Regul Sci. 2017 Jan;3(1):47-55. doi: 10.18001/TRS.3.1.5.
6
Relative - not absolute - judgments of credibility affect susceptibility to misinformation conveyed during discussion.可信度的相对判断而非绝对判断会影响讨论期间对错误信息的易感性。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
7
Applications of neuroscience in criminal law: legal and methodological issues.神经科学在刑法中的应用：法律与方法问题
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015;15(2):513. doi: 10.1007/s11910-014-0513-1.
8
The role of corporate credibility in legitimizing disease promotion.企业信誉在使疾病推广合法化方面的作用。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):452-61. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.138115. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
9
Does Behavioural Activation Lack Credibility Among Those Who Need It Most? A Comparison of Responses to Rationales for Behavioural Activation and Schema Therapy.行为激活疗法在最需要它的人群中缺乏可信度吗？对行为激活疗法和图式疗法理论依据的反应比较。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Jul;47(4):493-498. doi: 10.1017/S135246581800067X. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
Supporting non-experts in judging the credibility of risk assessments (CORA).支持非专业人士判断风险评估的可信度（CORA）。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:624-30. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.034. Epub 2013 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel participant-level meta-analytic evidence for AbSANT efficacy.关于AbSANT疗效的新型参与者水平的荟萃分析证据。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Aug 7;4:1017389. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1017389. eCollection 2023.
2
Survey of Investigators About Sharing Human Research Data in the Neurosciences.神经科学领域研究人员共享人类研究数据的调查。
Neurology. 2022 Sep 20;99(12):e1314-e1325. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200886. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
The past, present and future of Registered Reports.注册报告的过去、现在与未来。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Jan;6(1):29-42. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Sex differences in high-level appreciation of automobile design-evoked gamma broadband synchronization.高水平欣赏汽车设计诱发的伽马宽带同步中的性别差异。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):9797. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66515-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowing how effective an intervention, treatment, or manipulation is and increasing replication rates: accuracy in parameter estimation as a partial solution to the replication crisis.了解干预、治疗或操作的有效性并提高复制率：参数估计的准确性是解决复制危机的部分方法。
Psychol Health. 2021 Jan;36(1):59-77. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1757098. Epub 2020 May 7.
2
Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'.为何我们需要报告的不仅仅是“采用 t 检验或 ANOVA 进行数据分析”。
Elife. 2018 Dec 21;7:e36163. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36163.
3
Planning Study Size Based on Precision Rather Than Power.基于精度而不是功效规划研究规模。
Epidemiology. 2018 Sep;29(5):599-603. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000876.
4
A Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in Neuroscience.神经科学中稳健统计方法指南
Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2018 Jan 22;82:8.42.1-8.42.30. doi: 10.1002/cpns.41.
5
Exploratory reports: A new article type for Cortex.探索性报告：《大脑皮层》的一种新文章类型。
Cortex. 2017 Nov;96:A1-A4. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.014. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
6
The Failure of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing When Studying Incremental Changes, and What to Do About It.当研究增量变化时，零假设显著性检验的失败，以及应对方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Jan;44(1):16-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167217729162. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
7
Beyond differences in means: robust graphical methods to compare two groups in neuroscience.超越均值差异：神经科学中比较两组的稳健图形方法。
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Jul;46(2):1738-1748. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13610. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
Measurement error and the replication crisis.测量误差与可重复性危机。
Science. 2017 Feb 10;355(6325):584-585. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3618.
9
The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective.贝叶斯新统计：从贝叶斯视角看假设检验、估计、元分析和功效分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):178-206. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4.
10
Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.检测和避免可能的假阳性发现——实用指南。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Nov;92(4):1941-1968. doi: 10.1111/brv.12315. Epub 2016 Nov 23.