Suppr超能文献

癌症患者诊断后心肺适能与特定原因死亡率的关联。

Association of post-diagnosis cardiorespiratory fitness with cause-specific mortality in cancer.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Adult Survivorship Program, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;6(4):315-322. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa015.

Abstract

AIMS

The prognostic importance of post-diagnosis assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in cancer patients is not well established. We sought to examine the association between CRF and mortality in cancer patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a single-centre cohort analysis of 1632 patients (58% male; 64 ± 12 years) with adult-onset cancer who were clinically referred for exercise treadmill testing a median of 7 [interquartile range (IQR): 3-12] years after primary diagnosis. Cardiorespiratory fitness was defined as peak metabolic equivalents (METs) achieved during standard Bruce protocol and categorized by tertiles. The association between CRF and all-cause and cause-specific mortality was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for important covariates. Median follow-up was 4.6 (IQR: 2.6-7.0) years; a total of 411 deaths (229, 50, and 132 all-cause, cardiovascular (CV), and cancer related, respectively) occurred during this period. Compared with low CRF (range: 1.9-7.6 METs), the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 0.38 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.52] for intermediate CRF (range: 7.7-10.6 METs) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.11-0.27) for high CRF (range: 10.7-22.0 METs). The corresponding HRs were 0.40 (95% CI: 0.19-0.86) and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.16-1.05) for CV mortality and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.26-0.60) and 0.16 (95% CI: 0.09-0.28) for cancer mortality, respectively. The adjusted risk of all-cause, CV, and cancer mortality decreased by 26%, 14%, and 25%, respectively with each one MET increment in CRF.

CONCLUSION

Cardiorespiratory fitness is a strong, independent predictor of all-cause, CV, and cancer mortality, even after adjustment for important clinical covariates in patients with certain cancers.

摘要

目的

癌症患者诊断后评估心肺功能(CRF)的预后重要性尚未得到充分证实。我们旨在研究 CRF 与癌症患者死亡率之间的关系。

方法和结果

这是一项单中心队列分析,纳入了 1632 名(58%为男性;64±12 岁)成年期癌症患者,这些患者在初次诊断后中位数 7[四分位距(IQR):3-12]年时因临床需要接受运动平板测试。心肺功能通过标准 Bruce 方案中达到的最大代谢当量(METs)定义,并按三分位进行分类。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型评估 CRF 与全因和病因特异性死亡率之间的关系,调整了重要协变量。中位随访时间为 4.6[IQR:2.6-7.0]年;在此期间,共有 411 例死亡(229 例、50 例和 132 例分别为全因、心血管(CV)和癌症相关死亡)。与低 CRF(范围:1.9-7.6 METs)相比,全因死亡率的调整后危险比(HR)为 0.38[95%置信区间(CI):0.28-0.52],中 CRF(范围:7.7-10.6 METs)为 0.17(95% CI:0.11-0.27),高 CRF(范围:10.7-22.0 METs)为 0.17(95% CI:0.11-0.27)。CV 死亡率的相应 HR 分别为 0.40[95% CI:0.19-0.86]和 0.41[95% CI:0.16-1.05],癌症死亡率分别为 0.40[95% CI:0.26-0.60]和 0.16[95% CI:0.09-0.28]。CRF 每增加 1 MET,全因、CV 和癌症死亡率的调整风险分别降低 26%、14%和 25%。

结论

即使在调整了某些癌症患者的重要临床协变量后,CRF 仍然是全因、CV 和癌症死亡率的强有力、独立预测因素。

相似文献

4
Exercise blood pressure, cardiorespiratory fitness and mortality risk.运动血压、心肺适能与死亡风险。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jul-Aug;67:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

3
Exercise Prescription in Cardio-Oncology.心脏肿瘤学中的运动处方
J Clin Med. 2025 May 26;14(11):3724. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113724.
8
9
Cancer and Heart Failure: Dangerous Liaisons.癌症与心力衰竭:危险关联
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Aug 27;11(9):263. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11090263.

本文引用的文献

10
Physical Activity and Cancer Outcomes: A Precision Medicine Approach.体力活动与癌症结局:精准医学方法。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 1;22(19):4766-4775. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0067. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验