Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183605. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3605.
Adverse cardiovascular findings associated with habitual vigorous exercise have raised new questions regarding the benefits of exercise and fitness.
To assess the association of all-cause mortality and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients undergoing exercise treadmill testing.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients at a tertiary care academic medical center from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 2014, with a median follow-up of 8.4 years. Data analysis was performed from April 19 to July 17, 2018. Consecutive adult patients referred for symptom-limited exercise treadmill testing were stratified by age- and sex-matched cardiorespiratory fitness into performance groups: low (<25th percentile), below average (25th-49th percentile), above average (50th-74th percentile), high (75th-97.6th percentile), and elite (≥97.7th percentile).
Cardiorespiratory fitness, as quantified by peak estimated metabolic equivalents on treadmill testing.
All-cause mortality.
The study population included 122 007 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.4 [12.6] years; 72 173 [59.2%] male). Death occurred in 13 637 patients during 1.1 million person-years of observation. Risk-adjusted all-cause mortality was inversely proportional to cardiorespiratory fitness and was lowest in elite performers (elite vs low: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.20; 95% CI, 0.16-0.24; P < .001; elite vs high: adjusted HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95; P = .02). The increase in all-cause mortality associated with reduced cardiorespiratory fitness (low vs elite: adjusted HR, 5.04; 95% CI, 4.10-6.20; P < .001; below average vs above average: adjusted HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.34-1.49; P < .001) was comparable to or greater than traditional clinical risk factors (coronary artery disease: adjusted HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.24-1.35; P < .001; smoking: adjusted HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.36-1.46; P < .001; diabetes: adjusted HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.34-1.46; P < .001). In subgroup analysis, the benefit of elite over high performance was present in patients 70 years or older (adjusted HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.98; P = .04) and patients with hypertension (adjusted HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99; P = .05). Extreme cardiorespiratory fitness (≥2 SDs above the mean for age and sex) was associated with the lowest risk-adjusted all-cause mortality compared with all other performance groups.
Cardiorespiratory fitness is inversely associated with long-term mortality with no observed upper limit of benefit. Extremely high aerobic fitness was associated with the greatest survival and was associated with benefit in older patients and those with hypertension. Cardiorespiratory fitness is a modifiable indicator of long-term mortality, and health care professionals should encourage patients to achieve and maintain high levels of fitness.
与习惯性剧烈运动相关的不良心血管发现引发了新的问题,即运动和健身的益处。
评估在进行运动跑步机测试的患者中全因死亡率与心肺适能的相关性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1991 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间在一家三级护理学术医疗中心就诊的成年患者,中位随访时间为 8.4 年。数据分析于 2018 年 4 月 19 日至 7 月 17 日进行。根据年龄和性别匹配的心肺适能,将连续的成年患者分为表现组进行分层:低(<25 百分位)、低于平均水平(25 百分位-49 百分位)、平均水平以上(50 百分位-74 百分位)、高(75 百分位-97.6 百分位)和精英(≥97.7 百分位)。
心肺适能,通过跑步机测试中估计的最大代谢当量量化。
全因死亡率。
研究人群包括 122007 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄 53.4[12.6]岁;72173[59.2%]为男性)。在 100 万人年的观察期间,有 13637 名患者死亡。风险调整后的全因死亡率与心肺适能呈反比,精英表现者的死亡率最低(精英与低:调整后的危险比[HR],0.20;95%置信区间[CI],0.16-0.24;P<0.001;精英与高:调整后的 HR,0.77;95%CI,0.63-0.95;P=0.02)。与心肺适能降低相关的全因死亡率增加(低与精英:调整后的 HR,5.04;95%CI,4.10-6.20;P<0.001;低于平均水平与平均水平以上:调整后的 HR,1.41;95%CI,1.34-1.49;P<0.001)与传统临床危险因素(冠心病:调整后的 HR,1.29;95%CI,1.24-1.35;P<0.001;吸烟:调整后的 HR,1.41;95%CI,1.36-1.46;P<0.001;糖尿病:调整后的 HR,1.40;95%CI,1.34-1.46;P<0.001)相当或更大。在亚组分析中,在 70 岁或以上的患者(调整后的 HR,0.71;95%CI,0.52-0.98;P=0.04)和高血压患者(调整后的 HR,0.70;95%CI,0.50-0.99;P=0.05)中,精英表现优于高表现的获益仍然存在。与年龄和性别相比,极高的心肺适能(高于平均水平 2 个标准差以上)与最低的风险调整后全因死亡率相关。
心肺适能与长期死亡率呈反比,没有观察到获益的上限。极高的有氧健身与最大的生存相关,并与老年患者和高血压患者的获益相关。心肺适能是长期死亡率的一个可改变的指标,医疗保健专业人员应鼓励患者达到并保持高水平的健身。