Suppr超能文献

一线克唑替尼与铂类培美曲塞化疗用于晚期 ROS1 重排非小细胞肺癌患者。

First-line crizotinib versus platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in patients with advanced ROS1-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer.

机构信息

Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(10):3310-3318. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2972. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved crizotinib for advanced ROS1-rearranged (ROS1+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients due to a single-arm study PROFILE 1001. However, there is no direct comparison between crizotinib and platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data of advanced ROS1+NSCLC patients treated with first-line crizotinib or platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy between August 2010 and December 2017 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were eligible, including 30 (39.0%) in the crizotinib group and 47 (61.0%) in the platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 28.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.2-39.0). The objective response rate (ORR) of crizotinib (86.7%, 95% CI: 73.3-96.7) was higher than that of platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy (44.7%, 95% CI: 29.8-57.4, P < .001). The disease control rate (DCR) was 96.7% (95% CI: 90.0-100) in the crizotinib group and 85.1% (95% CI: 74.5-95.7) in the chemotherapy group (P = .140). Significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the patients treated with crizotinib (18.4 months, 95% CI: 6.4-30.3) versus platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy (8.6 months, 95% CI: 6.9-10.3, P < .001). Overall survival (OS) was also compared between the two groups and no significant difference was seen (Not reach vs 28.4 months [95% CI: 20.7-36.0], P = .176). Notably, a total of 37 patients have treatment crossover after the failure of first-line treatment. Among those patients, difference in OS was not statistically significant between seven patients who have given first-line crizotinib (38.6 months, 95% CI: 0-81.0) and 30 patients who have given platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy initially (32.8 months, 95% CI: 11.9-53.8, P = .805).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that first-line crizotinib had higher ORR and longer PFS than platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in patients with advanced ROS1+NSCLC, but the differences were not observed for OS.

摘要

目的

食品和药物管理局(FDA)基于单臂研究 PROFILE 1001 批准克唑替尼用于治疗晚期 ROS1 重排(ROS1+)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。然而,克唑替尼与铂类培美曲塞化疗之间没有直接比较。

材料和方法

分析了 2010 年 8 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受一线克唑替尼或铂类培美曲塞化疗治疗的晚期 ROS1+NSCLC 患者的临床数据。

结果

77 名患者符合条件,其中 30 名(39.0%)在克唑替尼组,47 名(61.0%)在铂类培美曲塞化疗组。中位随访时间为 28.1 个月(95%置信区间[CI]:19.2-39.0)。克唑替尼的客观缓解率(ORR)(86.7%,95%CI:73.3-96.7)高于铂类培美曲塞化疗(44.7%,95%CI:29.8-57.4,P<.001)。克唑替尼组的疾病控制率(DCR)为 96.7%(95%CI:90.0-100),化疗组为 85.1%(95%CI:74.5-95.7)(P=.140)。与铂类培美曲塞化疗组相比,接受克唑替尼治疗的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)明显更长(18.4 个月,95%CI:6.4-30.3)(8.6 个月,95%CI:6.9-10.3,P<.001)。两组之间也比较了总生存期(OS),但未见显著差异(未达到 vs 28.4 个月[95%CI:20.7-36.0],P=.176)。值得注意的是,一线治疗失败后,共有 37 名患者接受了治疗交叉。在这些患者中,7 名接受一线克唑替尼治疗的患者(38.6 个月,95%CI:0-81.0)和 30 名最初接受铂类培美曲塞化疗的患者(32.8 个月,95%CI:11.9-53.8)之间的 OS 差异无统计学意义(P=.805)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与铂类培美曲塞化疗相比,一线克唑替尼在晚期 ROS1+NSCLC 患者中具有更高的 ORR 和更长的 PFS,但 OS 差异无统计学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d35/7221427/eae2961fb06d/CAM4-9-3310-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验