Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(10):3310-3318. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2972. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved crizotinib for advanced ROS1-rearranged (ROS1+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients due to a single-arm study PROFILE 1001. However, there is no direct comparison between crizotinib and platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy.
Clinical data of advanced ROS1+NSCLC patients treated with first-line crizotinib or platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy between August 2010 and December 2017 were analyzed.
Seventy-seven patients were eligible, including 30 (39.0%) in the crizotinib group and 47 (61.0%) in the platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 28.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.2-39.0). The objective response rate (ORR) of crizotinib (86.7%, 95% CI: 73.3-96.7) was higher than that of platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy (44.7%, 95% CI: 29.8-57.4, P < .001). The disease control rate (DCR) was 96.7% (95% CI: 90.0-100) in the crizotinib group and 85.1% (95% CI: 74.5-95.7) in the chemotherapy group (P = .140). Significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in the patients treated with crizotinib (18.4 months, 95% CI: 6.4-30.3) versus platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy (8.6 months, 95% CI: 6.9-10.3, P < .001). Overall survival (OS) was also compared between the two groups and no significant difference was seen (Not reach vs 28.4 months [95% CI: 20.7-36.0], P = .176). Notably, a total of 37 patients have treatment crossover after the failure of first-line treatment. Among those patients, difference in OS was not statistically significant between seven patients who have given first-line crizotinib (38.6 months, 95% CI: 0-81.0) and 30 patients who have given platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy initially (32.8 months, 95% CI: 11.9-53.8, P = .805).
Our results suggested that first-line crizotinib had higher ORR and longer PFS than platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy in patients with advanced ROS1+NSCLC, but the differences were not observed for OS.
食品和药物管理局(FDA)基于单臂研究 PROFILE 1001 批准克唑替尼用于治疗晚期 ROS1 重排(ROS1+)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。然而,克唑替尼与铂类培美曲塞化疗之间没有直接比较。
分析了 2010 年 8 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受一线克唑替尼或铂类培美曲塞化疗治疗的晚期 ROS1+NSCLC 患者的临床数据。
77 名患者符合条件,其中 30 名(39.0%)在克唑替尼组,47 名(61.0%)在铂类培美曲塞化疗组。中位随访时间为 28.1 个月(95%置信区间[CI]:19.2-39.0)。克唑替尼的客观缓解率(ORR)(86.7%,95%CI:73.3-96.7)高于铂类培美曲塞化疗(44.7%,95%CI:29.8-57.4,P<.001)。克唑替尼组的疾病控制率(DCR)为 96.7%(95%CI:90.0-100),化疗组为 85.1%(95%CI:74.5-95.7)(P=.140)。与铂类培美曲塞化疗组相比,接受克唑替尼治疗的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)明显更长(18.4 个月,95%CI:6.4-30.3)(8.6 个月,95%CI:6.9-10.3,P<.001)。两组之间也比较了总生存期(OS),但未见显著差异(未达到 vs 28.4 个月[95%CI:20.7-36.0],P=.176)。值得注意的是,一线治疗失败后,共有 37 名患者接受了治疗交叉。在这些患者中,7 名接受一线克唑替尼治疗的患者(38.6 个月,95%CI:0-81.0)和 30 名最初接受铂类培美曲塞化疗的患者(32.8 个月,95%CI:11.9-53.8)之间的 OS 差异无统计学意义(P=.805)。
我们的结果表明,与铂类培美曲塞化疗相比,一线克唑替尼在晚期 ROS1+NSCLC 患者中具有更高的 ORR 和更长的 PFS,但 OS 差异无统计学意义。