Dimkpa Christian O, Andrews Joshua, Fugice Job, Singh Upendra, Bindraban Prem S, Elmer Wade H, Gardea-Torresdey Jorge L, White Jason C
International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), Muscle Shoals, AL, United States.
The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Feb 26;11:168. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00168. eCollection 2020.
Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) hold promise as novel fertilizer nutrients for crops. However, their ultra-small size could hinder large-scale field application due to potential for drift, untimely dissolution or aggregation. In this study, urea was coated with ZnO-NPs (1%) or bulk ZnO (2%) and evaluated in wheat ( L.) in a greenhouse, under drought (40% field moisture capacity; FMC) and non-drought (80% FMC) conditions, in comparison with urea not coated with ZnO (control), and urea with separate ZnO-NP (1%) or bulk ZnO (2%) amendment. Plants were exposed to ≤ 2.17 mg/kg ZnO-NPs and ≤ 4.34 mg/kg bulk-ZnO, indicating exposure to a higher rate of Zn from the bulk ZnO. ZnO-NPs and bulk-ZnO showed similar urea coating efficiencies of 74-75%. Drought significantly (p ≤ 0.05) increased time to panicle initiation, reduced grain yield, and inhibited uptake of Zn, nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P). Under drought, ZnO-NPs significantly reduced average time to panicle initiation by 5 days, irrespective of coating, and relative to the control. In contrast, bulk ZnO did not affect time to panicle initiation. Compared to the control, grain yield increased significantly, 51 or 39%, with ZnO-NP-coated or uncoated urea. Yield increases from bulk-ZnO-coated or uncoated urea were insignificant, compared to both the control and the ZnO-NP treatments. Plant uptake of Zn increased by 24 or 8% with coated or uncoated ZnO-NPs; and by 78 or 10% with coated or uncoated bulk-ZnO. Under non-drought conditions, Zn treatment did not significantly reduce panicle initiation time, except with uncoated bulk-ZnO. Relative to the control, ZnO-NPs (irrespective of coating) significantly increased grain yield; and coated ZnO-NPs enhanced Zn uptake significantly. Zn fertilization did not significantly affect N and P uptake, regardless of particle size or coating. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that coating urea with ZnO-NPs enhances plant performance and Zn accumulation, thus potentiating field-scale deployment of nano-scale micronutrients. Notably, lower Zn inputs from ZnO-NPs enhanced crop productivity, comparable to higher inputs from bulk-ZnO. This highlights a key benefit of nanofertilizers: a reduction of nutrient inputs into agriculture without yield penalities.
氧化锌纳米颗粒(ZnO-NPs)有望成为新型的作物肥料养分。然而,其超小尺寸可能会因存在漂移、过早溶解或聚集的可能性而阻碍大规模田间应用。在本研究中,用ZnO-NPs(1%)或块状ZnO(2%)对尿素进行包膜,并在温室中于干旱(田间持水量40%;FMC)和非干旱(田间持水量80%)条件下,在小麦(L.)中进行评估,同时与未用ZnO包膜的尿素(对照)以及分别添加ZnO-NP(1%)或块状ZnO(2%)的尿素进行比较。植株接触到的ZnO-NPs≤2.17 mg/kg,块状ZnO≤4.34 mg/kg,这表明从块状ZnO中接触到的锌含量更高。ZnO-NPs和块状ZnO的尿素包膜效率相似,为74 - 75%。干旱显著(p≤0.05)延长了抽穗起始时间,降低了籽粒产量,并抑制了锌、氮(N)和磷(P)的吸收。在干旱条件下,无论是否包膜,相对于对照,ZnO-NPs显著缩短了平均抽穗起始时间5天。相比之下,块状ZnO对抽穗起始时间没有影响。与对照相比,用ZnO-NP包膜或未包膜的尿素使籽粒产量显著增加,增幅分别为51%或39%。与对照和ZnO-NP处理相比,用块状ZnO包膜或未包膜的尿素产量增加不显著。包膜或未包膜的ZnO-NPs使植株对锌的吸收增加了24%或8%;包膜或未包膜的块状ZnO使植株对锌的吸收增加了78%或10%。在非干旱条件下,除了未包膜的块状ZnO外,锌处理对抽穗起始时间没有显著影响。相对于对照,ZnO-NPs(无论是否包膜)显著提高了籽粒产量;包膜的ZnO-NPs显著提高了锌的吸收。无论颗粒大小或包膜情况如何,锌施肥对氮和磷的吸收没有显著影响。总体而言,这些发现表明用ZnO-NPs包膜尿素可提高植株性能和锌积累,从而促进纳米级微量营养素在田间规模的应用。值得注意的是,来自ZnO-NPs的较低锌投入提高了作物生产力,与来自块状ZnO的较高投入相当。这突出了纳米肥料的一个关键优势:在不影响产量的情况下减少农业中的养分投入。