Research Center for Caries Prevention, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Community Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 26;8:6. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00006. eCollection 2020.
This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of health promotion interventions on early childhood caries prevention in 2-5 year-olds receiving dental treatment under general anesthesia. Thirty-seven mother-child couples presenting to the clinic of the Dental School of Tehran University of Medical Sciences for treatment under general anesthesia were randomly divided to two groups: 19 couples in the pamphlet and fluoride varnish four times a year, and 18 couples in the pamphlet plus six phone call reminders and fluoride varnish four times a year. A standard questionnaire on demographics and children oral health-related practice of parents was completed by respondents. On children's oral examination, the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S), dmft, and the presence of new white spot lesions (WS) were recorded in both phases. At the final stage, Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) was completed by parents. The length of follow-up was 24 months. In both groups, there was an increase in the number of mothers who knew how to brush their children's teeth as well as the number of mothers who brushed their children's teeth ( < 0.05). In the reminder group, an improvement occurred in the mothers' perception of their perceived ability to make their children brush their teeth twice a day ( = 0.03). Clinical examination revealed a significant decrease in the OHI-S (from 1.9 ± 0.8 to 1.15 ± 0.5) and the number of WS (from 8.5 ± 5.5 to 0.08 ± 0.5) in both groups on the follow-up visit. The mean dmft was 11.0 ± 4.0 with a mean d component of 10.56 ± 4 at the baseline, which decreased significantly to 1.44 ± 1.96 after dental treatment. No significant increase was seen in new caries in the intervention groups. There was no significant difference in the ECOHIS score between the two groups. The similar impact of both interventions suggests the possibility of applying the simpler one, i.e., the educational pamphlet, fluoride varnish and frequent follow-ups. However, in the reminder group, the mothers' perception of their perceived ability to make children brush their teeth twice a day was improved.
本研究旨在评估健康促进干预措施对接受全麻下牙科治疗的 2-5 岁儿童龋病预防的影响。37 对母子夫妇前往德黑兰大学医学科学牙科诊所接受全麻治疗,随机分为两组:19 对夫妇接受宣传册和氟化物漆每年四次,18 对夫妇接受宣传册加六次电话提醒和氟化物漆每年四次。受访者填写了一份关于人口统计学和儿童口腔健康相关行为的标准问卷。在儿童口腔检查中,记录了简化口腔卫生指数(OHI-S)、dmft 和新的白色斑点病变(WS)的存在情况。在最后阶段,家长完成了儿童早期口腔健康影响量表(ECOHIS)。随访时间为 24 个月。在两组中,知道如何给孩子刷牙的母亲人数以及给孩子刷牙的母亲人数都有所增加(<0.05)。在提醒组中,母亲对自己让孩子每天刷牙两次的能力的感知有所改善(=0.03)。临床检查显示,两组的 OHI-S(从 1.9±0.8 降至 1.15±0.5)和 WS 数量(从 8.5±5.5 降至 0.08±0.5)均显著下降。在基线时,dmft 的平均值为 11.0±4.0,d 成分的平均值为 10.56±4,在牙科治疗后显著降低至 1.44±1.96。干预组中未见新龋的显著增加。两组间 ECOHIS 评分无显著差异。两种干预措施的相似影响表明,可能应用更简单的方法,即教育手册、氟化物漆和频繁随访。然而,在提醒组中,母亲对自己让孩子每天刷牙两次的能力的感知有所改善。