• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过分子模拟理解生物GTP水解的最新进展

Recent Advances in Understanding Biological GTP Hydrolysis through Molecular Simulation.

作者信息

Calixto Ana Rita, Moreira Cátia, Kamerlin Shina Caroline Lynn

机构信息

Department of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University, BMC Box 576, S-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

ACS Omega. 2020 Feb 28;5(9):4380-4385. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00240. eCollection 2020 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1021/acsomega.0c00240
PMID:32175485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7066566/
Abstract

GTP hydrolysis is central to biology, being involved in regulating a wide range of cellular processes. However, the mechanisms by which GTPases hydrolyze this critical reaction remain controversial, with multiple mechanistic possibilities having been proposed based on analysis of experimental and computational data. In this mini-review, we discuss advances in our understanding of biological GTP hydrolysis based on recent computational studies and argue in favor of solvent-assisted hydrolysis as a conserved mechanism among GTPases. A concrete understanding of the fundamental mechanisms by which these enzymes facilitate GTP hydrolysis will have significant impact both for drug discovery efforts and for unraveling the role of oncogenic mutations.

摘要

GTP水解对生物学至关重要,参与调控广泛的细胞过程。然而,GTP酶水解这一关键反应的机制仍存在争议,基于对实验和计算数据的分析,已提出多种可能的机制。在本综述中,我们基于最近的计算研究讨论了我们对生物GTP水解理解的进展,并支持溶剂辅助水解作为GTP酶中的一种保守机制。具体了解这些酶促进GTP水解的基本机制,将对药物研发工作以及阐明致癌突变的作用产生重大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ee/7066566/b4c04c8896c7/ao0c00240_0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ee/7066566/306671bbd171/ao0c00240_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ee/7066566/1dd59329c6e7/ao0c00240_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ee/7066566/b4c04c8896c7/ao0c00240_0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ee/7066566/306671bbd171/ao0c00240_0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ee/7066566/1dd59329c6e7/ao0c00240_0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b7ee/7066566/b4c04c8896c7/ao0c00240_0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Recent Advances in Understanding Biological GTP Hydrolysis through Molecular Simulation.通过分子模拟理解生物GTP水解的最新进展
ACS Omega. 2020 Feb 28;5(9):4380-4385. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00240. eCollection 2020 Mar 10.
2
GTP Hydrolysis Without an Active Site Base: A Unifying Mechanism for Ras and Related GTPases.GTP 水解无需活性位点碱基:Ras 和相关 GTP 酶的统一机制。
J Am Chem Soc. 2019 Jul 10;141(27):10684-10701. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b03193. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Modeling the mechanisms of biological GTP hydrolysis.模拟生物GTP水解的机制。
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2015 Sep 15;582:80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.02.027. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
4
Analysis of GTPases carrying hydrophobic amino acid substitutions in lieu of the catalytic glutamine: implications for GTP hydrolysis.对携带疏水氨基酸取代催化性谷氨酰胺的GTP酶的分析:对GTP水解的影响
Proteins. 2005 May 1;59(2):332-8. doi: 10.1002/prot.20413.
5
Common mechanisms of catalysis in small and heterotrimeric GTPases and their respective GAPs.小GTP酶和异源三聚体GTP酶及其各自的GAP中的常见催化机制。
Biol Chem. 2017 May 1;398(5-6):523-533. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2016-0314.
6
GTP hydrolysis mechanism of Ras-like GTPases.类Ras GTP酶的GTP水解机制。
J Mol Biol. 2004 Jul 23;340(5):921-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.007.
7
Structural basis unifying diverse GTP hydrolysis mechanisms.结构基础统一了多种 GTP 水解机制。
Biochemistry. 2013 Feb 12;52(6):1122-30. doi: 10.1021/bi3014054. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
8
Structural plasticity mediates distinct GAP-dependent GTP hydrolysis mechanisms in Rab33 and Rab5.结构可塑性介导 Rab33 和 Rab5 中不同的 GAP 依赖性 GTP 水解机制。
FEBS J. 2017 Dec;284(24):4358-4375. doi: 10.1111/febs.14314. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
9
The significance of the free energy of hydrolysis of GTP for signal-transducing and regulatory GTPases.GTP水解自由能对于信号转导和调节性GTP酶的意义。
Biophys Chem. 2003;100(1-3):535-44. doi: 10.1016/s0301-4622(02)00304-6.
10
Multi-state targeting machinery govern the fidelity and efficiency of protein localization.多态靶向机制控制着蛋白质定位的保真度和效率。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;805:385-409. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02970-2_16.

引用本文的文献

1
Time-Resolved Crystallography Reveals the Mechanisms of GTP hydrolysis for N-RAS and the Oncogenic Mutants G12C, G12V and Q61L.时间分辨晶体学揭示了N-RAS及其致癌突变体G12C、G12V和Q61L的GTP水解机制。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 23:2025.08.21.670574. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.21.670574.
2
Mechanistic Insights into GTP Hydrolysis by the RhoA Protein: Catalytic Impact of Glutamine Tautomerism.RhoA蛋白催化GTP水解的作用机制洞察:谷氨酰胺互变异构的催化影响
ACS Catal. 2025 Feb 28;15(6):4415-4428. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5c00719. eCollection 2025 Mar 21.
3
The PH domain in the ArfGAP ASAP1 drives catalytic activation through an unprecedented allosteric mechanism.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic targeting of RAS: New hope for drugging the "undruggable".靶向治疗 RAS:为“不可成药”带来新希望。
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2020 Feb;1867(2):118570. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2019.118570. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
2
The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity.临床 KRAS(G12C) 抑制剂 AMG 510 可引发抗肿瘤免疫。
Nature. 2019 Nov;575(7781):217-223. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1694-1. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
3
The KRAS Inhibitor MRTX849 Provides Insight toward Therapeutic Susceptibility of KRAS-Mutant Cancers in Mouse Models and Patients.
ArfGAP ASAP1中的PH结构域通过一种前所未有的变构机制驱动催化激活。
Res Sq. 2025 Mar 19:rs.3.rs-5462793. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5462793/v1.
4
Allosteric modulation of NF1 GAP: Differential distributions of catalytically competent populations in loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutants.神经纤维瘤蛋白1(NF1)GAP的变构调节:功能丧失和功能获得突变体中具有催化活性群体的差异分布。
Protein Sci. 2025 Feb;34(2):e70042. doi: 10.1002/pro.70042.
5
The PH domain in the ArfGAP ASAP1 drives catalytic activation through an unprecedented allosteric mechanism.ArfGAP ASAP1中的PH结构域通过一种前所未有的变构机制驱动催化激活。
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 21:2024.12.20.629688. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.20.629688.
6
Dynamic regulation of RAS and RAS signaling.RAS 及其信号通路的动态调控。
Biochem J. 2023 Jan 13;480(1):1-23. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20220234.
7
Synthesis and Effect of Conformationally Locked Carbocyclic Guanine Nucleotides on Dynamin.环化碳核苷鸟嘌呤核苷酸的合成及其对动力蛋白的影响。
Biomolecules. 2022 Apr 16;12(4):584. doi: 10.3390/biom12040584.
KRAS 抑制剂 MRTX849 为 KRAS 突变型癌症在小鼠模型和患者中的治疗敏感性提供了新的见解。
Cancer Discov. 2020 Jan;10(1):54-71. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-1167. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
The Ras switch in structural and historical perspective.从结构和历史角度看 Ras 开关。
Biol Chem. 2019 Dec 18;401(1):143-163. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2019-0330.
5
GTP Hydrolysis Without an Active Site Base: A Unifying Mechanism for Ras and Related GTPases.GTP 水解无需活性位点碱基:Ras 和相关 GTP 酶的统一机制。
J Am Chem Soc. 2019 Jul 10;141(27):10684-10701. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b03193. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
6
Diversity of mechanisms in Ras-GAP catalysis of guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis revealed by molecular modeling.分子建模揭示 Ras-GAP 催化三磷酸鸟苷水解的机制多样性。
Org Biomol Chem. 2019 May 15;17(19):4879-4891. doi: 10.1039/c9ob00463g.
7
A GAP-GTPase-GDP-P Intermediate Crystal Structure Analyzed by DFT Shows GTP Hydrolysis Involves Serial Proton Transfers.通过 DFT 分析的 GAP-GTPase-GDP-P 中间体晶体结构表明 GTP 水解涉及连续质子转移。
Chemistry. 2019 Jun 26;25(36):8484-8488. doi: 10.1002/chem.201901627. Epub 2019 May 27.
8
Hybrid QM/MM vs Pure MM Molecular Dynamics for Evaluating Water Distribution within p21 and the Resulting GTP Electronic Density.杂化量子力学/分子力学与纯分子力学分子动力学在评估 p21 内水的分布和由此产生的 GTP 电子密度中的比较。
J Phys Chem B. 2019 May 9;123(18):3935-3944. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b02660. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
9
Exposing catalytic versatility of GTPases: taking reaction detours in mutants of hGBP1 enzyme without additional energetic cost.揭示 GTPases 的催化多功能性:在 hGBP1 酶的突变体中不走附加能量成本的反应捷径。
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019 Jan 2;21(2):859-867. doi: 10.1039/c8cp06343e.
10
Water Distribution within Wild-Type NRas Protein and Q61 Mutants during Unrestrained QM/MM Dynamics.野生型 NRas 蛋白和 Q61 突变体在无约束 QM/MM 动力学过程中的水分分布。
Biophys J. 2018 Oct 16;115(8):1417-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.07.042. Epub 2018 Aug 28.