Department of Biological Engineering, The University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive, MS 0904, Moscow, ID, 83844-0904, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Louisville, 332 Eastern Pkwy, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2020 Mar 16;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12987-020-00185-5.
Blood removal from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in post-subarachnoid hemorrhage patients may reduce the risk of related secondary brain injury. We formulated a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to investigate the impact of a dual-lumen catheter-based CSF filtration system, called Neurapheresis™ therapy, on blood removal from CSF compared to lumbar drain.
A subject-specific multiphase CFD model of CSF system-wide solute transport was constructed based on MRI measurements. The Neurapheresis catheter geometry was added to the model within the spinal subarachnoid space (SAS). Neurapheresis flow aspiration and return rate was 2.0 and 1.8 mL/min, versus 0.2 mL/min drainage for lumbar drain. Blood was modeled as a bulk fluid phase within CSF with a 10% initial tracer concentration and identical viscosity and density as CSF. Subject-specific oscillatory CSF flow was applied at the model inlet. The dura and spinal cord geometry were considered to be stationary. Spatial-temporal tracer concentration was quantified based on time-average steady-streaming velocities throughout the domain under Neurapheresis therapy and lumbar drain. To help verify CFD results, an optically clear in vitro CSF model was constructed with fluorescein used as a blood surrogate. Quantitative comparison of numerical and in vitro results was performed by linear regression of spatial-temporal tracer concentration over 24-h.
After 24-h, tracer concentration was reduced to 4.9% under Neurapheresis therapy compared to 6.5% under lumbar drain. Tracer clearance was most rapid between the catheter aspiration and return ports. Neurapheresis therapy was found to have a greater impact on steady-streaming compared to lumbar drain. Steady-streaming in the cranial SAS was ~ 50× smaller than in the spinal SAS for both cases. CFD results were strongly correlated with the in vitro spatial-temporal tracer concentration under Neurapheresis therapy (R = 0.89 with + 2.13% and - 1.93% tracer concentration confidence interval).
A subject-specific CFD model of CSF system-wide solute transport was used to investigate the impact of Neurapheresis therapy on tracer removal from CSF compared to lumbar drain over a 24-h period. Neurapheresis therapy was found to substantially increase tracer clearance compared to lumbar drain. The multiphase CFD results were verified by in vitro fluorescein tracer experiments.
蛛网膜下隙出血患者脑脊液(CSF)清除可降低相关继发性脑损伤风险。我们构建了一个计算流体动力学(CFD)模型,旨在研究与腰椎引流相比,基于双腔导管的 CSF 过滤系统(称为神经切除术治疗)对 CSF 中血液清除的影响。
根据 MRI 测量值,构建了 CSF 系统整体溶质转运的个体化多相 CFD 模型。神经切除术导管几何形状被添加到脊髓蛛网膜下腔(SAS)内的模型中。神经切除术的抽吸和回吸率分别为 2.0 和 1.8 mL/min,而腰椎引流为 0.2 mL/min。血液在 CSF 中被模拟为一个具有 10%初始示踪剂浓度和与 CSF 相同的粘度和密度的整体流体相。在模型入口处应用了个体的振荡 CSF 流动。硬脑膜和脊髓几何形状被认为是静止的。在神经切除术治疗和腰椎引流下,通过整个区域的时均稳态流速,量化了示踪剂的时空浓度。为了帮助验证 CFD 结果,构建了一个光学透明的体外 CSF 模型,使用荧光素作为血液替代物。通过对 24 小时内的时空示踪剂浓度进行线性回归,对数值和体外结果进行了定量比较。
在 24 小时后,与腰椎引流相比,神经切除术治疗下的示踪剂浓度降低到 4.9%。在导管抽吸和回吸口之间,示踪剂清除最快。与腰椎引流相比,神经切除术治疗对稳态流动的影响更大。对于两种情况,颅 SAS 中的稳态流动速度均比脊髓 SAS 小约 50 倍。CFD 结果与神经切除术治疗下的体外时空示踪剂浓度具有很强的相关性(R=0.89,示踪剂浓度置信区间为+2.13%和-1.93%)。
我们使用个体化 CSF 系统整体溶质转运的 CFD 模型来研究与腰椎引流相比,神经切除术治疗在 24 小时内对 CSF 中示踪剂清除的影响。与腰椎引流相比,神经切除术治疗显著增加了示踪剂清除率。多相 CFD 结果通过体外荧光素示踪剂实验得到验证。