• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube视频提供了关于肩袖疾病的低质量教育内容。

YouTube videos provide low-quality educational content about rotator cuff disease.

作者信息

Kunze Kyle N, Alter Kevin H, Cohn Matthew R, Vadhera Amar S, Verma Nikhil N, Yanke Adam B, Chahla Jorge

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Sep;25(3):217-223. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00927. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

DOI:10.5397/cise.2022.00927
PMID:35971604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9471818/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

YouTube has become a popular source of healthcare information in orthopedic surgery. Although quality-based studies of YouTube content have been performed for information concerning many orthopedic pathologies, the quality and accuracy of information on the rotator cuff have yet to be evaluated. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the reliability and educational content of YouTube videos concerning the rotator cuff.

METHODS

YouTube was queried for the term "rotator cuff." The first 50 videos from this search were evaluated. Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (range, 0-5). Educational content was assessed using the global quality score (GQS; range, 0-4) and the rotator cuff-specific score (RCSS; range, 0-22).

RESULTS

The mean number of views was 317,500.7±538,585.3. The mean JAMA, GQS, and RCSS scores were 2.7±2.0, 3.7±1.0, and 5.6±3.6, respectively. Non-surgical intervention content was independently associated with a lower GQS (β=-2.19, p=0.019). Disease-specific video content (β=4.01, p=0.045) was the only independent predictor of RCSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall quality and educational content of YouTube videos concerned with the rotator cuff were low. Physicians should caution patients in using such videos as resources for decision-making and should counsel them appropriately.

摘要

背景

YouTube已成为骨科手术中一个受欢迎的医疗保健信息来源。尽管针对许多骨科疾病的信息,已开展了基于质量的YouTube内容研究,但有关肩袖的信息质量和准确性尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是评估YouTube上有关肩袖的视频的可靠性和教育内容。

方法

在YouTube上搜索“肩袖”一词。对此次搜索结果的前50个视频进行评估。使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准(范围为0至5)评估视频可靠性。使用全球质量评分(GQS;范围为0至4)和肩袖特异性评分(RCSS;范围为0至22)评估教育内容。

结果

平均观看次数为317,500.7±538,585.3。JAMA、GQS和RCSS的平均得分分别为2.7±2.0、3.7±1.0和5.6±3.6。非手术干预内容与较低的GQS独立相关(β=-2.19,p=0.019)。疾病特异性视频内容(β=4.01,p=0.045)是RCSS的唯一独立预测因素。

结论

YouTube上有关肩袖的视频的整体质量和教育内容较低。医生应提醒患者谨慎使用此类视频作为决策资源,并应给予他们适当的建议。

相似文献

1
YouTube videos provide low-quality educational content about rotator cuff disease.YouTube视频提供了关于肩袖疾病的低质量教育内容。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Sep;25(3):217-223. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.00927. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
3
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
4
Online Videos Regarding Relevant Postoperative Patient Information and Postoperative Rehabilitation After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Provide Poor Information Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability.在线视频提供的有关关节镜肩袖修复术后相关患者信息和术后康复的信息质量差、准确性低、可靠性差。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Dec;39(12):2443-2453.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.031. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
5
YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis.YouTube作为后交叉韧带信息来源:内容质量与可靠性分析
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov 27;1(2):e109-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2019.09.003. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
YouTube and the Achilles Tendon: An Analysis of Internet Information Reliability and Content Quality.YouTube与跟腱:互联网信息可靠性及内容质量分析
Cureus. 2022 Apr 9;14(4):e23984. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23984. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
Analysis of the Quality, Reliability, and Educational Content of YouTube Videos Concerning Spine Tumors.关于脊柱肿瘤的YouTube视频的质量、可靠性及教育内容分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):278-282. doi: 10.14444/8215.
8
Assessing the Quality and Credibility of Publicly Available Videos on Cervical Fusion: Is YouTube a Reliable Educational Tool?评估公开可用的颈椎融合手术视频的质量和可信度:YouTube是一个可靠的教育工具吗?
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Aug;15(4):669-675. doi: 10.14444/8088. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
9
Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube as a Source for Patient Education on Dupuytren's Contracture.YouTube作为掌腱膜挛缩症患者教育来源的质量与可靠性分析
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Feb 21;6(3):313-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Assessing the Quality of YouTube Videos on Adhesive Capsulitis.评估YouTube上关于粘连性肩关节囊炎视频的质量。
Cureus. 2022 Jul 28;14(7):e27406. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27406. eCollection 2022 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
YouTube as a source of information on robotic knee replacement: a quality analysis.YouTube作为机器人辅助膝关节置换术信息来源的质量分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 11;145(1):404. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06024-2.
2
Platelet-rich plasma videos for knee osteoarthritis on YouTube are of acceptable quality and content.YouTube上关于膝骨关节炎的富血小板血浆视频在质量和内容方面是可以接受的。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43437. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043437.
3
YouTube Videos on Lateral Epicondylitis Often Lack High-Quality, Reliable Information.关于外侧上髁炎的YouTube视频往往缺乏高质量、可靠的信息。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr 15;7(3):101150. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101150. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Cross-platform analysis of atrial fibrillation scientific videos: using composite index and a basic assessment scale.心房颤动科学视频的跨平台分析:使用综合指数和基本评估量表。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;13:1507776. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1507776. eCollection 2025.
5
From the Editor.来自编辑
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2024 Dec 31;58(6):312. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.243112.
6
Comparative analysis of NAFLD-related health videos on TikTok: a cross-language study in the USA and China.TikTok上非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关健康视频的比较分析:美国和中国的跨语言研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):3375. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20851-9.
7
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of YouTube as an Information Source for Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.评估YouTube作为经椎间孔椎间融合术信息来源的质量和可靠性。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 9;15(12):e50210. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50210. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions.评估YouTube作为半月板斜韧带损伤信息来源的可靠性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 3;12(1):23259671231219815. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219815. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Patient-oriented educational Sports Medicine YouTube videos in Arabic have higher view counts in the Middle East and North Africa than their English versions.面向患者的阿拉伯语体育医学教育类 YouTube 视频在中东和北非地区的浏览量高于其英文版。
Int Orthop. 2023 Dec;47(12):3007-3011. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05970-z. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
10
The Most Popular YouTube Videos About Shoulder Replacement Are of Poor Quality for Patient Education.关于肩关节置换术最热门的YouTube视频在患者教育方面质量欠佳。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Apr 20;5(3):e623-e628. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.03.001. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial Commentary: YouTube Videos Provide Poor-Quality Medical Information: Don't Believe What You Watch!社论评论:YouTube 视频提供低质量的医疗信息:眼见未必为实!
Arthroscopy. 2020 Dec;36(12):3048-3049. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.07.042.
2
YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis.YouTube作为后交叉韧带信息来源:内容质量与可靠性分析
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019 Nov 27;1(2):e109-e114. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2019.09.003. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
4
A Quality Analysis of Disc Herniation Videos on YouTube.YouTube 上椎间盘突出症视频的质量分析
World Neurosurg. 2019 Apr;124:e799-e804. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.146. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
5
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Education.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的YouTube视频作为患者教育的来源。
Asian Spine J. 2018 Dec;12(6):987-991. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.12.6.987. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
6
Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上分享的脊柱后凸视频中的信息准确性和质量。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Nov 15;43(22):E1334-E1339. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002691.
7
Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review.医学类YouTube视频及其评估方法:文献综述
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Feb 12;4(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/mededu.8527.
8
The future of social media in orthopedic surgery.骨科手术中社交媒体的未来。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Jun;10(2):278-279. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9412-9.
9
Assessment of "YouTube" Content for Distal Radius Fracture Immobilization.“YouTube”上关于桡骨远端骨折固定内容的评估。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Sep-Oct;74(5):799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
10
Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Patient Resources for the Management of Articular Cartilage Defects.评估用于关节软骨缺损管理的在线患者资源的质量、准确性和可读性。
Cartilage. 2017 Apr;8(2):112-118. doi: 10.1177/1947603516648737. Epub 2016 Jun 23.