Department of Gynecology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700, RB, Groningen, the Netherlands.
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00920-y.
Endometrial sampling for the surveillance of women with Lynch syndrome is an invasive and painful procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a less invasive procedure of collecting vital cells by vaginal tampons.
This was a prospective feasibility study of women scheduled to undergo annual gynecological surveillance, including endometrial sampling. We included consecutive asymptomatic women with Lynch syndrome or first-degree relatives and asked them to insert a vaginal tampon 2-4 h before attending their outpatient appointment. Feasibility was evaluated by the following metrics: patient acceptance, pain intensity of each procedure (assessed by visual analog scale; range 0-10), and the presence of vital cells obtained by tampon-based or endometrial sampling methods. Two pathologists independently evaluated all samples.
In total, 25 of 32 approached women completed the tampon-based procedure, with 23 of these subsequently undergoing invasive endometrial sampling. The median visual analog scale scores for tampon use and invasive endometrial sampling were 0 (range, 0-10) and 5.5 (range, 1-10) (p < 0.001). None of the tampon samples analyzed by cytology showed endometrial cells, but they did contain vital squamous cells and granulocytes. By contrast, 18 (78%) of the invasive endometrial samples contained enough endometrial tissue for analysis. No endometrial abnormalities were found by endometrial sampling.
Tampon-based endometrial surveillance was a well-accepted and non-painful procedure, and although tampons contained vital cells, they did not provide endometrial cells. However, this study was limited to asymptomatic women with Lynch syndrome (no endometrial pathology), indicating that research is needed to evaluate whether the tampon method has any utility for endometrial surveillance in women with Lynch syndrome.
对于林奇综合征患者的子宫内膜取样是一种有创和痛苦的程序。本研究旨在评估通过阴道棉塞收集重要细胞的侵入性较小程序的可行性。
这是一项对计划进行年度妇科监测的无症状林奇综合征患者或一级亲属的前瞻性可行性研究,包括子宫内膜取样。我们邀请连续的无症状林奇综合征患者或一级亲属在就诊前 2-4 小时插入阴道棉塞。通过以下指标评估可行性:患者接受度、两种程序的疼痛强度(通过视觉模拟量表评估;范围 0-10),以及通过棉塞或子宫内膜取样方法获得的活细胞的存在。两位病理学家独立评估所有样本。
共有 32 名被接触的女性中,25 名完成了基于棉塞的程序,其中 23 名随后进行了有创性子宫内膜取样。棉塞使用和有创性子宫内膜取样的中位数视觉模拟量表评分为 0(范围,0-10)和 5.5(范围,1-10)(p<0.001)。细胞学分析的棉塞样本均未显示子宫内膜细胞,但确实包含有活力的鳞状细胞和粒细胞。相比之下,18(78%)例有创性子宫内膜样本中含有足够用于分析的子宫内膜组织。子宫内膜取样未发现子宫内膜异常。
基于棉塞的子宫内膜监测是一种接受度高且无痛苦的程序,尽管棉塞中含有有活力的细胞,但它们并未提供子宫内膜细胞。然而,本研究仅限于无症状的林奇综合征患者(无子宫内膜病理),这表明需要研究评估棉塞方法在林奇综合征患者的子宫内膜监测中的任何效用。