• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors of extended length of stay after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术后延长住院时间的预测因素。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Mar;11(Suppl 2):S239-S245. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
2
Bilateral simultaneous unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus unilateral total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of the amount of blood loss and transfusion, perioperative complications, hospital stay, and functional recovery.双侧同期单髁膝关节置换术与单侧全膝关节置换术的比较:失血量与输血量、围手术期并发症、住院时间及功能恢复情况的对比
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Nov;103(7):1041-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
3
Surgeon, implant, and patient variables may explain variability in early revision rates reported for unicompartmental arthroplasty.外科医生、植入物和患者的变量可能可以解释单髁关节置换术早期翻修率报告的变异性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 18;95(24):2195-202. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01006.
4
Length of hospital stay after craniotomy for tumor: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.肿瘤开颅术后的住院时间:一项国家外科质量改进计划分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E12. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15386.
5
Blood loss and transfusion rates following total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis.全髋关节置换术后的失血量和输血率:多变量分析。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2022 Mar;88(1):27-34. doi: 10.52628/88.1.04.
6
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Compartment Arthritis in Patients Older Than 75 Years: Comparable Reoperation, Revision, and Complication Rates.75岁以上患者内侧间室关节炎的单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术:再手术、翻修及并发症发生率相当
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1792-1797. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
An Analysis of Risk Factors for Short-Term Complication Rates and Increased Length of Stay Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术后短期并发症发生率及住院时间延长的危险因素分析
HSS J. 2015 Jul;11(2):112-6. doi: 10.1007/s11420-014-9422-8. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
8
Factors affecting length of stay after elective posterior lumbar spine surgery: a multivariate analysis.影响择期腰椎后路手术后住院时间的因素:一项多因素分析
Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.022. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
9
Perioperative predictors of prolonged length of hospital stay following total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study from a single center in China.全膝关节置换术后住院时间延长的围手术期预测因素:来自中国单中心的回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3042-x.
10
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty undertaken using a fast-track protocol.采用快速康复方案进行单髁膝关节置换术。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Sep;102-B(9):1167-1175. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B9.BJJ-2020-0247.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Postoperative anterior knee pain in robot assisted total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术后膝前疼痛:倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Aug 5;22:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100301. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Length of stay and discharge dispositions following robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus conventional technique and predictors of delayed discharge.机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术和单髁膝关节置换术与传统技术相比的住院时间、出院处置及延迟出院的预测因素
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Oct 19;4(10):791-800. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.410.BJO-2023-0126.R1.
3
Can machine learning models predict prolonged length of hospital stay following primary total knee arthroplasty based on a national patient cohort data?基于全国患者队列数据,机器学习模型能否预测初次全膝关节置换术后住院时间延长?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Dec;143(12):7185-7193. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05013-7. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Metabolic equivalent of task scores avoid the ceiling effect observed with conventional patient-reported outcome scores following knee arthroplasty.任务代谢当量评分避免了膝关节置换术后传统患者报告结局评分中出现的天花板效应。
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Mar 1;4(3):129-137. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.43.BJO-2022-0119.R1.
5
Rehabilitation approach in robot assisted total knee arthroplasty: an observational study.机器人辅助全膝关节置换康复方法:一项观察性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 22;24(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06230-2.
6
Identification of risk factors associated with prolonged hospital stay following primary knee replacement surgery: a retrospective, longitudinal observational study.初次膝关节置换术后住院时间延长的相关风险因素的识别:一项回顾性、纵向观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 16;12(12):e068252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068252.
7
Predicting Length of Stay using machine learning for total joint replacements performed at a rural community hospital.使用机器学习预测在农村社区医院进行的全关节置换术的住院时间。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 10;17(11):e0277479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277479. eCollection 2022.
8
Preadmission assessment of extended length of hospital stay with RFECV-ETC and hospital-specific data.使用 RFECV-ETC 和医院特定数据进行住院时间延长的入院前评估。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Jul 25;27(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00754-4.
9
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Octogenarians: A National Database Analysis Including Over 700 Octogenarians.老年患者单髁膝关节置换术:一项纳入700多名老年患者的全国性数据库分析
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Apr 4;15:55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.02.009. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
On the generalizability of same-day partial knee replacement surgery-A non-selective interventional study evaluating efficacy, patient satisfaction, and safety in a public hospital setting.在同一天行部分膝关节置换术的可推广性方面-一项在公立医院环境中评估疗效、患者满意度和安全性的非选择性干预性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260816. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Inpatient Status After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare-Aged Patients.预测 Medicare 年龄段患者初次全膝关节置换术后的住院状态。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1322-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
2
Trends and determinants of length of stay and hospital reimbursement following knee and hip replacement: evidence from linked primary care and NHS hospital records from 1997 to 2014.膝关节和髋关节置换术后住院时间及医院报销的趋势与决定因素:来自1997年至2014年初级医疗与英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)医院关联记录的证据
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 27;8(1):e019146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019146.
3
Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.髋关节和膝关节置换术后的加速康复:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Dec;93(1106):736-742. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-134991. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
4
Enhanced recovery protocols in total joint arthroplasty: a review of the literature and their implementation.全关节置换术中的加速康复方案:文献综述及其实施
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Feb;187(1):97-109. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1641-9. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
5
Discharge on the day of surgery following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty within the United Kingdom NHS.在英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)下,单髁膝关节置换术后在手术当天出院。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):788-792. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-0540.R2.
6
Effects of the Length of Stay on the Cost of Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty from 2002 to 2013.2002年至2013年住院时间对全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术费用的影响
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Mar 1;99(5):402-407. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00019.
7
Outpatient unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: who is afraid of outpatient surgery?门诊单髁膝关节置换术:谁害怕门诊手术?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):759-766. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4440-y. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
8
Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty, Total Knee Arthroplasty, and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature.门诊全髋关节置换术、全膝关节置换术和单髁膝关节置换术:文献系统综述
JBJS Rev. 2016 Dec 27;4(12). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00002.
9
Patient and Perioperative Variables Affecting 30-Day Readmission for Surgical Complications After Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: A Matched Cohort Study.影响髋膝关节置换术后手术并发症30天再入院的患者及围手术期变量:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1074-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
An Interdisciplinary Approach to Reducing Length of Stay in Joint Replacement Patients.一种减少关节置换患者住院时间的跨学科方法。
Orthop Nurs. 2016 Sep-Oct;35(5):279-98. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000274.

单髁膝关节置换术后延长住院时间的预测因素。

Predictors of extended length of stay after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Sephton B M, Bakhshayesh P, Edwards T C, Ali A, Kumar Singh V, Nathwani D

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, W6 8RF, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Mar;11(Suppl 2):S239-S245. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2019.09.009
PMID:32189948
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7067998/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify factors that independently predict extended length of stay after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) surgery (defined as length of stay longer than 3 days), and to identify factors predicting early post-operative complications.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing UKA from January 2016-January 2019 at our institution was performed. Clinical notes were reviewed to determine the following information: Patient age (years), gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, weight (kg), height (meters), body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, indication for surgery, surgeon, surgical volume, surgical technique (navigated or patient-specific instrumentation), implant manufacturer, estimated blood loss (ml), application of tourniquet during the surgery, application of drain, hospital length of stay (days) and surgical complications.

RESULTS

Multivariate regression analysis showed that ASA 3-4 vs. ASA 1-2 [OR 4.4 (CI; 1.8-10.8, p = 0.001)] and a history of cardiovascular disease [OR 2.8 (CI; 1.4-5.5), p = 0.004)] were significant independent predictors of prolonged length of stay. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit of the model showed a p-value of 0.214. Nagelkerke R-Square was 0.2. For complications, multivariate regression analysis showed that ASA 3-4 vs. ASA 1-2 [OR 5.8 (CI; 1.7-20.7)] and high BMI (BMI >30) [OR 4.3 (CI; 1.1-17.1)] were significant independent predictors of complications. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit was 0.89 and Nagelkerke R-Square was 0.2. Patients treated with robotics (Navio) techniques had shorter length of stay median 51 h (IQR; 29-96) when compared to other techniques 72 h (IQR; 52-96), p = 0.008.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our study, high ASA grade (≥3) appears to be the most important factor excluding eligibility for fast-track UKA. Any number of co-morbidities may increase ASA, but in and of themselves, apart from a history of cardiovascular disease, they should not be seen as contraindications. Appropriate patient selection, technical tools and details during the surgery could facilitate fast track surgery.

摘要

目的

确定单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)后独立预测延长住院时间(定义为住院时间超过3天)的因素,并确定预测术后早期并发症的因素。

方法

对2016年1月至2019年1月在本机构接受UKA手术的所有患者进行回顾性分析。查阅临床记录以确定以下信息:患者年龄(岁)、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、体重(kg)、身高(米)、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、手术指征、外科医生、手术量、手术技术(导航或定制器械)、植入物制造商、估计失血量(ml)、手术中止血带的应用、引流管的应用、住院时间(天)和手术并发症。

结果

多因素回归分析显示,ASA 3 - 4级与ASA 1 - 2级相比[比值比(OR)4.4(可信区间CI;1.8 - 10.8,p = 0.001)]以及有心血管疾病史[OR 2.8(CI;1.4 - 5.5),p = 0.004]是住院时间延长的显著独立预测因素。模型的Hosmer - Lemeshow拟合优度显示p值为0.214。Nagelkerke决定系数R²为0.2。对于并发症,多因素回归分析显示,ASA 3 - 4级与ASA 1 - 2级相比[OR 5.8(CI;1.7 - 20.7)]以及高BMI(BMI > 30)[OR 4.3(CI;1.1 - 17.1)]是并发症的显著独立预测因素。Hosmer - Lemeshow拟合优度为0.89,Nagelkerke决定系数R²为0.2。与其他技术(72小时,四分位间距IQR;52 - 96)相比,采用机器人技术(Navio)治疗的患者住院时间更短,中位数为51小时(IQR;29 - 96),p = 0.008。

结论

根据我们的研究结果,高ASA分级(≥3)似乎是排除快速通道UKA资格的最重要因素。任何数量的合并症都可能增加ASA分级,但就其本身而言,除了心血管疾病史外,不应将其视为禁忌证。适当的患者选择、技术工具和手术中的细节可以促进快速通道手术。