• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥农村初级保健诊所综合心理健康项目的实施过程与成果:一项混合方法研究

Implementation process and outcomes of a mental health programme integrated in primary care clinics in rural Mexico: a mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Miguel-Esponda Georgina, Bohm-Levine Nathaniel, Rodríguez-Cuevas Fátima Gabriela, Cohen Alex, Kakuma Ritsuko

机构信息

1Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.

2University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Mar 16;14:21. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00346-x. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s13033-020-00346-x
PMID:32190108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7074983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policies and programmes in Mexico promote the integration of mental health services into primary health care (PHC), however these services remain largely unavailable in the country. Since 2014 a non-governmental organisation has delivered a mental health programme at PHC clinics in the state of Chiapas, in partnership with the local Ministry of Health (MoH). The programme provides mental health services based on the mhGAP guidelines through multiple implementation strategies, including programme financing, infrastructure strengthening, high-intensity training, and supervision. This study aimed to examine the implementation process and outcomes of this mental health programme to understand the extent to which mental health care integration has been achieved and to identify the successes and remaining challenges in order to inform the development and implementation of similar programmes.

METHODS

We used a mixed-methods convergent design. Quantitative data for the period between December 2016 and December 2017 were extracted from the organisation's health information system to capture process indicators, including the amount (dose) and quality (fidelity) of services delivered. We conducted two focus groups and 24 semi-structured interviews with health providers and managers to ascertain implementation outcome data: penetration, fidelity, acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive and framework analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

During the study period, health providers delivered mental health consultations to 486 adults diagnosed with a mood or anxiety disorder. Programme fidelity was limited given that talk-based interventions, which are required in all consultations according to programme guidelines, were only provided in 24% of consultations. Only 42% of service users attended more than 50% of scheduled mental health follow-up consultations, which also hindered fidelity. Low attendance is partially attributed to limited programme appropriateness, given that interventions to address social risk factors are not available. High levels of acceptability and feasibility enabled through strong support from the organisation were key programme strengths.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental health programmes at PHC can be implemented when adequate support and supervision structures are in place, and key resources are available. There is an urgent need for health systems strengthening to support efforts to provide mental health care, and to link PHC with locally-relevant social interventions.

摘要

背景

墨西哥的政策和项目推动将精神卫生服务纳入初级卫生保健(PHC),然而该国这些服务在很大程度上仍然难以获得。自2014年以来,一个非政府组织与恰帕斯州当地卫生部(MoH)合作,在该州的初级卫生保健诊所开展了一项精神卫生项目。该项目通过多种实施策略,包括项目融资、基础设施强化、高强度培训和监督,依据mhGAP指南提供精神卫生服务。本研究旨在考察该精神卫生项目的实施过程和结果,以了解精神卫生保健整合的实现程度,并确定成功之处和尚存的挑战,为类似项目的开发和实施提供信息。

方法

我们采用了混合方法收敛设计。从该组织的健康信息系统中提取了2016年12月至2017年12月期间的定量数据,以获取过程指标,包括提供服务的数量(剂量)和质量(保真度)。我们对卫生服务提供者和管理人员进行了两个焦点小组讨论和24次半结构化访谈,以确定实施结果数据:渗透率、保真度、可接受性、适宜性和可行性。分别使用描述性分析和框架分析对定量和定性数据进行分析。

结果

在研究期间,卫生服务提供者为486名被诊断患有情绪或焦虑障碍的成年人提供了精神卫生咨询。鉴于根据项目指南所有咨询都需要的基于谈话的干预措施仅在24%的咨询中提供,项目保真度有限。只有42%的服务使用者参加了超过50%的预定精神卫生随访咨询,这也妨碍了保真度。就诊率低部分归因于项目适宜性有限,因为缺乏解决社会风险因素的干预措施。该组织的大力支持所带来的高度可接受性和可行性是项目的关键优势。

结论

当有适当的支持和监督结构且有关键资源可用时,初级卫生保健中的精神卫生项目可以实施。迫切需要加强卫生系统,以支持提供精神卫生保健的努力,并将初级卫生保健与当地相关的社会干预措施联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/8bdd882c4f2a/13033_2020_346_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/a94eba6cfca6/13033_2020_346_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/3d546306895d/13033_2020_346_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/b7e49462ddb5/13033_2020_346_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/8bdd882c4f2a/13033_2020_346_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/a94eba6cfca6/13033_2020_346_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/3d546306895d/13033_2020_346_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/b7e49462ddb5/13033_2020_346_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6704/7074983/8bdd882c4f2a/13033_2020_346_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation process and outcomes of a mental health programme integrated in primary care clinics in rural Mexico: a mixed-methods study.墨西哥农村初级保健诊所综合心理健康项目的实施过程与成果:一项混合方法研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Mar 16;14:21. doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00346-x. eCollection 2020.
2
3
A systematic review of structured versus non-structured breastfeeding programmes to support the initiation and duration of exclusive breastfeeding in acute and primary healthcare settings.一项关于结构化与非结构化母乳喂养计划的系统评价,以支持在急性和初级卫生保健环境中开始并持续进行纯母乳喂养。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(36):1471-1508. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109360-00001.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Evaluating process and clinical outcomes of a primary care mental health integration project in rural Rwanda: a prospective mixed-methods protocol.评估卢旺达农村初级保健心理健康整合项目的过程和临床结果:一项前瞻性混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 28;7(2):e014067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014067.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the integration of depression services in primary care in Vietnam: a mixed methods study.越南初级保健中抑郁症服务整合的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3416-z.
7
SMART Mental Health Project: process evaluation to understand the barriers and facilitators for implementation of multifaceted intervention in rural India.SMART心理健康项目:过程评估,以了解在印度农村实施多方面干预措施的障碍和促进因素。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Feb 8;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00438-2.
8
Reducing stigma among healthcare providers to improve mental health services (RESHAPE): protocol for a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial of a stigma reduction intervention for training primary healthcare workers in Nepal.减少医疗服务提供者的污名化以改善心理健康服务(RESHAPE):尼泊尔一项针对初级医疗工作者培训的污名化减少干预措施的试点整群随机对照试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Jan 24;4:36. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0234-3. eCollection 2018.
9
Understanding the implementation of Direct Health Facility Financing and its effect on health system performance in Tanzania: a non-controlled before and after mixed method study protocol.了解坦桑尼亚直接卫生机构融资的实施情况及其对卫生系统绩效的影响:一项非对照前后混合方法研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jan 30;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0400-3.
10
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing modifications to the mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide during implementation in low- and middle-income countries using the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions: a systematic review of reviews.使用循证干预措施的改编和修改报告框架,描述低收入和中等收入国家在实施心理健康差距行动方案(mhGAP)干预指南期间所做的修改:一项综述的系统评价
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2025 Jul 2;19(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13033-025-00671-z.
2
Integrated programs for common mental illnesses within primary care and community settings in Latin America: a scoping review of components and implementation strategies.拉丁美洲初级保健和社区环境中常见精神疾病的综合项目:对组成部分和实施策略的范围审查
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Dec 7;41:100931. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100931. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of mental health programmes in primary care in low-income and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家初级保健中精神卫生项目的障碍与促进因素
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;7(1):78-92. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30125-7. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
2
Integrated care for people with long-term mental and physical health conditions in low-income and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家中长期身心健康状况患者的综合护理。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;6(2):174-186. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30298-0. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
3
Effectiveness of strategies to improve health-care provider practices in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
The Large-Scale Implementation of a Health Information System in Brazilian University Hospitals: Process and Outcomes.巴西大学附属医院卫生信息系统的大规模实施:过程与结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 25;20(21):6971. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20216971.
4
Integration measurement and its applications in low- and middle-income country health systems: a scoping review.整合测量及其在中低收入国家卫生系统中的应用:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):1876. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16724-2.
5
Coping with climate change: The role of climate related stressors in affecting the mental health of young people in Mexico.应对气候变化:气候相关压力源对墨西哥年轻人心理健康的影响
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Sep 27;3(9):e0002219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002219. eCollection 2023.
6
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.医护人员对初级医疗一体化的认知和体验:定性证据的范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD013603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013603.pub3.
7
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of primary healthcare integration: a scoping review of qualitative evidence.卫生保健工作者对初级卫生保健整合的看法和经验:定性证据的范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 11;7(7):CD013603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013603.pub2.
8
Strategies to adapt and implement health system guidelines and recommendations: a scoping review.适应和实施卫生系统指南和建议的策略:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jun 15;20(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00865-8.
9
Adapting Problem Management Plus for Implementation: Lessons Learned from Public Sector Settings Across Rwanda, Peru, Mexico and Malawi.调整问题管理升级版以进行实施:卢旺达、秘鲁、墨西哥和马拉维公共部门的经验教训。
Intervention (Amstelveen). 2021 Jan-Jun;19(1):58-66. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
10
WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact.世界卫生组织精神卫生差距行动规划(mhGAP)干预指南:关于证据和影响的最新系统评价
Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 Apr 26;24(3):124-30. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254.
提高中低收入国家卫生保健提供者实践的策略的效果:系统评价。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1163-e1175. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30398-X. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
4
The feasibility of a role for community health workers in integrated mental health care for perinatal depression: a qualitative study from Surabaya, Indonesia.社区卫生工作者在围产期抑郁症综合精神卫生保健中发挥作用的可行性:来自印度尼西亚泗水的一项定性研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 May 31;12:27. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0208-0. eCollection 2018.
5
Social determinants of mental disorders and the Sustainable Development Goals: a systematic review of reviews.精神障碍的社会决定因素与可持续发展目标:一项综述的系统评价
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;5(4):357-369. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30060-9.
6
Community health workers improve disease control and medication adherence among patients with diabetes and/or hypertension in Chiapas, Mexico: an observational stepped-wedge study.社区卫生工作者改善了墨西哥恰帕斯州糖尿病和/或高血压患者的疾病控制及药物依从性:一项观察性阶梯楔形研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 15;3(1):e000566. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000566. eCollection 2018.
7
International variations in primary care physician consultation time: a systematic review of 67 countries.初级保健医生会诊时间的国际差异:对67个国家的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(10):e017902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017902.
8
Strengthening mental health system governance in six low- and middle-income countries in Africa and South Asia: challenges, needs and potential strategies.加强非洲和南亚六个低收入和中等收入国家的心理健康系统治理:挑战、需求与潜在策略
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Jun 1;32(5):699-709. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx014.
9
Validity and Utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2 and PHQ-9 for Screening and Diagnosis of Depression in Rural Chiapas, Mexico: A Cross-Sectional Study.患者健康问卷(PHQ)-2和PHQ-9在墨西哥恰帕斯州农村地区抑郁症筛查与诊断中的有效性和实用性:一项横断面研究
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Sep;73(9):1076-1090. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22390. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
10
Barriers to Integrating Mental Health Services in Community-Based Primary Care Settings in Mexico City: A Qualitative Analysis.墨西哥城社区基层医疗环境中整合心理健康服务的障碍:一项定性分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 May 1;68(5):497-502. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600141. Epub 2016 Dec 15.