• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在符合决策的启发式条件下,在现实方差假设下具有更高的元认知敏感性。

A decision-congruent heuristic gives superior metacognitive sensitivity under realistic variance assumptions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2020 Oct;127(5):655-671. doi: 10.1037/rev0000184. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1037/rev0000184
PMID:32191072
Abstract

Psychophysical studies on confidence construction are often grounded in bidimensional signal detection theory (SDT) and its relatives. However, these studies often stand on oversimplified assumptions of (a) bidimensional variance-equality and (b) bidimensional statistical independence. The present study simulated 2-alternative forced-choice and confidence rating performances, incorporating more empirically plausible variance-covariance structures. One prominent observation is that superior metacognitive accuracy can be achieved when one applies a heuristic in which the response-incongruent dimension of information is ignored. This is because such an heuristic takes advantage of the specific unequal-variance structure, which paradoxically cannot be easily exploited if both dimensions are evaluated together. Furthermore, under a variety of internal statistical structures, this simple heuristic predicts dissociations of objective decision and subjective metacognition, which have been empirically observed. Also, it provides a tentative account of some behavioral features of blindsight. Therefore, this surprisingly simple decision heuristic may inspire novel perspectives on metacognition and consciousness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

关于置信构建的心理物理学研究通常基于二维信号检测理论(SDT)及其相关理论。然而,这些研究往往基于(a)二维方差均等和(b)二维统计独立性的过于简化的假设。本研究模拟了 2 种替代强制选择和置信度评分表现,纳入了更符合经验的方差协方差结构。一个突出的观察结果是,当应用一种启发式方法忽略信息的不一致维度时,可以实现更好的元认知准确性。这是因为这种启发式方法利用了特定的不等方差结构,如果同时评估两个维度,这种结构就不容易被利用。此外,在各种内部统计结构下,这种简单的启发式方法可以预测客观决策和主观元认知的分离,这已经在经验上得到了观察。它还为盲视的一些行为特征提供了一个初步的解释。因此,这种令人惊讶的简单决策启发式方法可能会为元认知和意识提供新的视角。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
A decision-congruent heuristic gives superior metacognitive sensitivity under realistic variance assumptions.在符合决策的启发式条件下,在现实方差假设下具有更高的元认知敏感性。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Oct;127(5):655-671. doi: 10.1037/rev0000184. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
History biases reveal novel dissociations between perceptual and metacognitive decision-making.历史偏见揭示了知觉和元认知决策之间的新分离。
J Vis. 2023 May 2;23(5):14. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.5.14.
3
Metacognitive sensitivity of subjective reports of decisional confidence and visual experience.决策信心和视觉体验主观报告的元认知敏感性。
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:192-205. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
4
Heuristic use of perceptual evidence leads to dissociation between performance and metacognitive sensitivity.对感知证据的启发式使用导致了表现与元认知敏感性之间的分离。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):923-37. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1059-x.
5
The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.元认知效率在知觉决策中的本质。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan;128(1):45-70. doi: 10.1037/rev0000249. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
A closer look at children's metacognitive skills: The case of the distinctiveness heuristic.深入探究儿童的元认知技能:独特性启发式的案例
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Aug;172:130-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation.决策的自我评估:元认知计算的通用贝叶斯框架。
Psychol Rev. 2017 Jan;124(1):91-114. doi: 10.1037/rev0000045.
8
Heuristics from bounded meta-learned inference.来自有界元学习推理的启发式方法。
Psychol Rev. 2022 Oct;129(5):1042-1077. doi: 10.1037/rev0000330. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
A confidence framing effect: Flexible use of evidence in metacognitive monitoring.一种信心框架效应:元认知监测中证据的灵活运用。
Conscious Cogn. 2024 Feb;118:103636. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2024.103636. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
Sure I'm Sure: Prefrontal Oscillations Support Metacognitive Monitoring of Decision Making.确信即确信:前额叶振荡支持决策的元认知监控。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 25;37(4):781-789. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1612-16.2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural and computational underpinnings of biased confidence in human reinforcement learning.人类强化学习中偏见信心的神经和计算基础。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 28;14(1):6896. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42589-5.
2
Toward 'Computational-Rationality' Approaches to Arbitrating Models of Cognition: A Case Study Using Perceptual Metacognition.迈向用于评判认知模型的“计算合理性”方法:以感知元认知为例的案例研究
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Sep 20;7:652-674. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00100. eCollection 2023.
3
Natural statistics support a rational account of confidence biases.
自然统计数据支持对置信偏差进行理性解释。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 6;14(1):3992. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39737-2.
4
Paradoxical evidence weighting in confidence judgments for detection and discrimination.检测和辨别信心判断中的矛盾证据权重。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Oct;85(7):2356-2385. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02710-8. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
5
On the assumptions behind metacognitive measurements: Implications for theory and practice.元认知测量背后的假设:对理论和实践的启示。
J Vis. 2022 Sep 2;22(10):18. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.10.18.
6
The positive evidence bias in perceptual confidence is unlikely post-decisional.知觉信心方面的积极证据偏差不太可能是决策后产生的。
Neurosci Conscious. 2022 Jul 26;2022(1):niac010. doi: 10.1093/nc/niac010. eCollection 2022.
7
Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition.视觉元认知领域的共识目标。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;17(6):1746-1765. doi: 10.1177/17456916221075615. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Are children's judgments of another's accuracy linked to their metacognitive confidence judgments?儿童对他人准确性的判断是否与他们的元认知信心判断相关?
Metacogn Learn. 2021;16(2):485-516. doi: 10.1007/s11409-021-09263-x. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
9
Confirmation bias is adaptive when coupled with efficient metacognition.当确认偏误与有效的元认知相结合时,它是适应性的。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200131. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0131. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
10
A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today.了解我们今天研究意识的方式的原因,一点历史背景知识就大有帮助。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):6976-6984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921623117. Epub 2020 Mar 13.