Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1278-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07499-3. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Video consultation (VC) is gaining attention as a possible alternative to out-patient clinic visits. However, little is known in terms of attitude, satisfaction and quality of care using VC over a face-to-face (F2F) consultation. The aim of this observational survey study was to compare the attitude and satisfaction with VC amongst patients suffering from colorectal cancer and their treating surgeons at the outpatient surgical care clinic in a tertiary referral centre.
A patient-preference model was chosen following the concept of shared decision making. A total of fifty patients with colorectal cancer were asked to choose between VC- or a F2F-contact during their follow up at the outpatient surgical care clinic and were subsequently assigned to either the VC-group or the F2F-group. Attitude and satisfaction rates of both groups and their surgeons were measured using a questionnaire administered immediately after the consultation.
Out of the 50 patients, 42% chose VC as their preferred follow-up modality. Patients demographics did not differ significantly. Patients who use video calling in their personal life choose VC significantly more often than patients lacking such experience (p = 0.010). These patients scored high on both the attitude- and satisfaction scale of the post-VC questionnaire. Patients who chose a F2F-contact seemed to question the ability of the surgeon to properly assess their healthcare condition by using a video connection more (p = 0.024). Surgeons were highly satisfied with the use of VC.
Based on patient preference, VC is equivalent to a F2F consultation in terms of patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. Shared decision making is preferred with regard to which contact modality is used during follow up. For easy uptake in other environments it is to be recommended to facilitate VC using the electronic patient portal.
视频咨询(VC)作为门诊就诊的替代方式受到关注。然而,关于通过 VC 进行的医患沟通相对于面对面(F2F)咨询在态度、满意度和护理质量方面的情况知之甚少。本观察性调查研究的目的是比较在一家三级转诊中心的门诊外科护理诊所中,接受结直肠癌治疗的患者及其外科医生对 VC 的态度和满意度。
采用患者偏好模型,遵循共同决策的理念。在门诊外科护理诊所随访时,共有 50 例结直肠癌患者被要求在 VC 或 F2F 接触之间做出选择,随后被分配到 VC 组或 F2F 组。两组患者及其外科医生的态度和满意度通过咨询后立即进行的问卷调查进行测量。
在 50 例患者中,42%选择 VC 作为首选的随访方式。患者的人口统计学特征无显著差异。在个人生活中使用视频通话的患者比缺乏此类体验的患者更倾向于选择 VC(p=0.010)。这些患者在 VC 后的问卷调查中,在态度和满意度两个方面的评分都很高。选择 F2F 接触的患者似乎更质疑外科医生通过视频连接评估其健康状况的能力(p=0.024)。外科医生对 VC 的使用非常满意。
根据患者偏好,VC 在患者满意度和感知护理质量方面与 F2F 咨询等效。在选择使用哪种联系方式进行随访方面,共同决策是首选。为了在其他环境中方便采用,建议使用电子患者门户来促进 VC 的使用。