Suppr超能文献

专科姑息医学医师和护士预测近期死亡(72 小时内)的准确性:简短报告。

Specialist palliative medicine physicians and nurses accuracy at predicting imminent death (within 72 hours): a short report.

机构信息

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK

School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):209-212. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002224. Epub 2020 Mar 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Research suggests that clinicians are not very accurate at prognosticating in palliative care. The 'horizon effect' suggests that accuracy ought to be better when the survival of patients is shorter. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of specialist palliative care clinicians at identifying which patients are likely to die within 72 hours.

DESIGN

In a secondary data analysis of a prospective observational study, specialist palliative care doctors and nurses (in a hospice and a hospital palliative care team) provided survival predictions (yes/no/uncertain) about which patients would die within 72 hours.

RESULTS

Survival predictions were obtained for 49 patients. A prediction from a nurse was obtained for 37/49 patients. A prediction from a doctor was obtained for 46/49 patients. In total, 23 (47%)/49 patients actually died within 72 hours of assessment. Nurses accurately predicted the outcome in 27 (73%)/37 cases. Doctors accurately predicted the outcome in 30 (65%)/46 cases. When comparing predictions given on the same patients (27 [55%]/49), nurses were slightly better at recognising imminent death than doctors (positive predictive value (the proportion of patients who died when the clinician predicted death)=79% vs 60%, respectively). The difference in c-statistics (nurses 0.82 vs doctors 0.63) was not significant (p=0.13).

CONCLUSION

Even when patients are in the terminal phase and close to death, clinicians are not very good at predicting how much longer they will survive. Further research is warranted to improve prognostication in this population.

摘要

目的

研究表明,临床医生在姑息治疗中的预后预测并不十分准确。“地平线效应”表明,当患者的生存时间较短时,准确性应该更高。本研究的目的是确定专科姑息治疗医生识别哪些患者可能在 72 小时内死亡的准确性。

设计

在一项前瞻性观察研究的二次数据分析中,专科姑息治疗医生和护士(在临终关怀和医院姑息治疗团队中)对哪些患者将在 72 小时内死亡做出生存预测(是/否/不确定)。

结果

为 49 名患者获得了生存预测。37/49 名患者获得了护士的预测。46/49 名患者获得了医生的预测。总共,23(47%)/49 名患者在评估后 72 小时内实际死亡。护士准确预测了 27(73%)/37 例的结果。医生准确预测了 30(65%)/46 例的结果。当比较对同一患者的预测(27 [55%]/49)时,护士在识别即将死亡方面略优于医生(阳性预测值(当医生预测死亡时死亡的患者比例)=79%比 60%)。C 统计量的差异(护士 0.82 比医生 0.63)无统计学意义(p=0.13)。

结论

即使患者处于终末期并接近死亡,临床医生也不擅长预测他们还能存活多久。需要进一步研究以改善该人群的预后预测。

相似文献

7
Imminent death: clinician certainty and accuracy of prognostic predictions.即将死亡:临床医生对预后预测的确定性和准确性。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;12(e6):e785-e791. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001761. Epub 2019 May 10.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Recognising dying in motor neurone disease: A scoping review.认识肌萎缩侧索硬化症中的濒死状态:范围综述。
Palliat Med. 2024 Oct;38(9):923-934. doi: 10.1177/02692163241263231. Epub 2024 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

3
Nurses' estimations of patients' prognoses in the last days of life.护士对患者临终前预后的评估。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 1995 Jan 2;1(1):12-16. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.1995.1.1.12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验