Doumas Michael, Imprialos Konstantinos P, Kallistratos Manolis S, Manolis Athanasios J
2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Makedonia, 54250, Greece.
VAMC and George Washington University, Washington, USA.
F1000Res. 2020 Mar 9;9. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21669.1. eCollection 2020.
The management of resistant hypertension presents several challenges in everyday clinical practice. During the past few years, several studies have been performed to identify efficient and safe pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for the management of such patients. The Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2) trial demonstrated significant benefits with the use of spinorolactone as a fourth-line drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension over doxazosin and bisoprolol. In addition, recent data support that spironolactone may demonstrate superiority over central acting drugs in such patients, as well. Based on the European guidelines, spironolactone is recommended as the fourth-line drug option, followed by amiloride, other diuretics, doxazosin, bisoprolol or clonidine. Among several device-based approaches, renal sympathetic denervation had fallen into hibernation after the disappointing results of the Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN) 3 trial. However, the technique re-emerged at the epicenter of the clinical and research interest after the favorable results of three sham-controlled studies, which facilitated novel catheters and techniques to perform the denervation. Significant results of iliac anastomosis on blood pressure levels have also been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the technique-related adverse events resulted in withdrawal of this interventional approach. Last, the sympatholytic properties of the carotid baroreceptor activation therapy were associated with significant blood pressure reductions in patients with resistant hypertension, which need to be verified in larger controlled trials. Currently device-based approaches are recommended only in the setting of clinical trials until more safety and efficacy data become available.
在日常临床实践中,顽固性高血压的管理面临诸多挑战。在过去几年里,已经开展了多项研究,以确定治疗此类患者的有效且安全的药物和非药物选择。螺内酯与安慰剂、比索洛尔和多沙唑嗪对比以确定顽固性高血压最佳治疗方案(PATHWAY-2)试验表明,使用螺内酯作为治疗顽固性高血压的四线药物比多沙唑嗪和比索洛尔具有显著优势。此外,近期数据支持螺内酯在此类患者中可能也优于中枢作用药物。根据欧洲指南,推荐螺内酯作为四线药物选择,其次是阿米洛利、其他利尿剂、多沙唑嗪、比索洛尔或可乐定。在几种基于器械的治疗方法中,肾交感神经去支配术在难治性高血压患者肾去神经支配(SYMPLICITY HTN)3试验结果令人失望后陷入停滞。然而,在三项假手术对照研究取得良好结果后,这项技术重新成为临床和研究关注的焦点,这些研究推动了新型导管和去神经支配技术的发展。髂动脉吻合术对血压水平的显著效果也得到了证实。尽管如此,与该技术相关的不良事件导致这种介入治疗方法被停用。最后,颈动脉压力感受器激活疗法的交感神经抑制特性与顽固性高血压患者的显著血压降低相关,这需要在更大规模的对照试验中得到验证。目前,在获得更多安全性和有效性数据之前,仅在临床试验中推荐基于器械的治疗方法。