• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量家庭成员将慢性病融入家庭生活的体验:慢性病家庭融入体验量表(FIES:CI)的初步有效性和可靠性。

Measuring Family Members' Experiences of Integrating Chronic Illness Into Family Life: Preliminary Validity and Reliability of the Family Integration Experience Scale:Chronic Illness (FIES:CI).

机构信息

Winona State University-Rochester, MN, USA.

Minnesota State University, Mankato, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Nurs. 2020 May;26(2):111-125. doi: 10.1177/1074840720902129. Epub 2020 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1177/1074840720902129
PMID:32202186
Abstract

Measures of family members' experiences of integrating chronic conditions (CC) or chronic illnesses (CI) into family life are needed to optimize family care. This article reports development and psychometric testing of the Family Integration Experience Scale: Chronic Illness (FIES:CI), a measure of family member perceptions of integrating CC or CI into evolving family life. Family Systems Nursing (FSN), the Reintegration Within Families in the Context of Chronic Illness Model, and measurement theory guided the study. Participants were those ( = 328) managing a CC or CI. Concurrent validity ( = +.629; < .001) and discriminant validity, (1, 155) = 7.09; < .05, were demonstrated. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-dimensional model explaining 63.8% variance. Scale internal reliability was α = .70 and .785, and factor reliabilities were α = .798 (Factor 1) and α = .847 (Factor 2). Test-retest item and subscale correlations, while accounting for intra-family correlation, were acceptable. The FIES:CI contributes a valuable new measure of family integration in the context of CC or CI with preliminary validity and reliability as tested in these samples.

摘要

需要衡量家庭成员将慢性病(CC)或慢性疾病(CI)融入家庭生活的体验,以优化家庭护理。本文报告了家庭整合体验量表:慢性疾病(FIES:CI)的开发和心理测量学测试,该量表衡量了家庭成员对将 CC 或 CI 融入不断发展的家庭生活的看法。家庭系统护理(FSN)、慢性疾病背景下的家庭再整合模型以及测量理论指导了这项研究。参与者是那些(=328)正在管理 CC 或 CI 的人。同时验证了效度(=+。629;<。001)和判别效度,(1,155)=7.09;<。05。探索性因素分析显示,一个二维模型可以解释 63.8%的方差。量表的内部信度为α=。70 和。785,因子信度为α=。798(因子 1)和α=。847(因子 2)。考虑到家庭内相关性,测试-重测项目和子量表的相关性是可以接受的。FIES:CI 在 CC 或 CI 背景下提供了一个有价值的家庭整合新指标,在这些样本中经过初步验证和可靠性测试。

相似文献

1
Measuring Family Members' Experiences of Integrating Chronic Illness Into Family Life: Preliminary Validity and Reliability of the Family Integration Experience Scale:Chronic Illness (FIES:CI).测量家庭成员将慢性病融入家庭生活的体验:慢性病家庭融入体验量表(FIES:CI)的初步有效性和可靠性。
J Fam Nurs. 2020 May;26(2):111-125. doi: 10.1177/1074840720902129. Epub 2020 Mar 22.
2
Psychometric Testing of the Experience of Integrating Chronic Illness into Family Life Questionnaire.家庭生活中慢性疾病融入体验问卷的心理测试。
J Fam Nurs. 2024 May;30(2):174-184. doi: 10.1177/10748407241236010. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Validity and reliability of the Danish version of the Ice Expressive Family Functioning and Ice Family Perceived Support questionnaires.丹麦版《冰表达性家庭功能问卷》和《冰家庭感知支持问卷》的效度与信度
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Dec;32(4):1447-1457. doi: 10.1111/scs.12591. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
4
The development and validation of the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16)© to assess the impact of disease on the partner or family member.家庭报告结局测量量表(FROM-16)的制定与验证©旨在评估疾病对伴侣或家庭成员的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):317-26. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0457-y.
5
Translation and validation of the Danish version of the brief family assessment measure III in a sample of acutely admitted elderly medical patients.丹麦版简短家庭评估量表III在急性收治的老年内科患者样本中的翻译与验证
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Sep;32(3):1247-1253. doi: 10.1111/scs.12541. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Validation of the German version of the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16) to assess the impact of disease on the partner or family member.验证德文版家庭报告结局测量工具(FROM-16),以评估疾病对伴侣或家庭成员的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Mar 24;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01738-4.
7
Reliability and validity of PROMIS® pediatric family relationships short form in children 8-17 years of age with chronic disease.8-17 岁慢性病患儿 PROMIS®儿童家庭关系简短式量表的信度和效度。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Jan;29(1):191-199. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02266-x. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
8
Strategies used by families to cope with chronic mental illnesses: Psychometric properties of the family crisis oriented personal evaluation scale.家庭应对慢性精神疾病的策略:家庭危机导向个人评估量表的心理测量特性。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2020 Apr;56(2):462-473. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12457. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
9
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
10
Testing the psychometric properties of the illness perceptions questionnaire for OCD (IPQ-O).测试强迫症疾病感知问卷(IPQ-O)的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2195-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Unravelling typology of family life when a parent has heart disease: A qualitative study of families with adolescents.剖析父母患有心脏病时的家庭生活类型:对有青少年的家庭的定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Apr 8;8:100324. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100324. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Validation of the Family Integration Experience Scale: Chronic Illness for the Portuguese language spoken in Brazil.家庭融合体验量表的验证:巴西葡萄牙语的慢性病版本。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Sep 23;32:e4248. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.6961.4248. eCollection 2024.
3
Living with Long Term Conditions from the Perspective of Family Caregivers. A Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis.
从家庭照顾者的角度看长期病患者。范围审查和叙事综合。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 8;18(14):7294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147294.