• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与他人在一起会更快乐吗?对与他人共度时间和主观幸福感之间的联系的调查。

Are we happier with others? An investigation of the links between spending time with others and subjective well-being.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University.

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep;119(3):672-694. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000290. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000290
PMID:32202811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7416486/
Abstract

Previous research suggests that having close relationships is a fundamental human need that, when fulfilled, is positively associated with subjective well-being. Recently, however, scholars have argued that actually interacting with one's closest partners may be psychologically taxing (e.g., because of pressures to provide support, care, and empathy). In the present research, we tested (a) how experiential affect varied as a function of which persons were currently present (e.g., romantic partners, friends, and colleagues), as well as (b) how global well-being varied as a function of total daily time invested in these individuals. Replicating previous research, participants reported the highest levels of experiential well-being in the company of their friends, followed by their romantic partners, and then children. Statistically controlling for the activities performed with others, however, suggested that individuals did not necessarily prefer the mere company of their friends per se: people reported similar levels of well-being while in the presence of friends, partners, and children when adjusting estimates for activities. In contrast to the experiential findings, global well-being varied only as a function of total time spent with one's romantic partner. Our findings further support the claim that experiential and global well-being are often separable constructs that may show different patterns of association with relationship experiences (e.g., well-being may operate differently on within- vs. between-persons levels). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

先前的研究表明,拥有亲密的人际关系是人类的基本需求,这种需求得到满足时,会与主观幸福感呈正相关。然而,最近学者们认为,与最亲密的伴侣实际互动可能会带来心理压力(例如,因为需要提供支持、照顾和同理心)。在本研究中,我们检验了(a)体验情感如何随当前在场的人(例如,浪漫伴侣、朋友和同事)的不同而变化,以及(b)整体幸福感如何随与这些人每天投入的总时间的变化而变化。研究结果复制了先前的研究,参与者报告说,在朋友的陪伴下体验到的幸福感最高,其次是浪漫伴侣,然后是孩子。然而,通过控制与他人一起进行的活动进行统计分析,表明人们并不一定喜欢朋友的单纯陪伴:当根据活动调整估计值时,人们在有朋友、伴侣和孩子陪伴时报告的幸福感水平相似。与体验结果相反,整体幸福感仅随与浪漫伴侣共度的总时间而变化。我们的研究结果进一步支持了这样一种观点,即体验幸福感和整体幸福感通常是可分离的结构,它们与关系体验的关联模式可能不同(例如,幸福感在人际内和人际间水平上的作用可能不同)。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Are we happier with others? An investigation of the links between spending time with others and subjective well-being.与他人在一起会更快乐吗?对与他人共度时间和主观幸福感之间的联系的调查。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep;119(3):672-694. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000290. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
The Highs and Lows of Love: Romantic Relationship Quality Moderates Whether Spending Time With One's Partner Predicts Gains or Losses in Well-Being.爱情的高低起伏:浪漫关系质量调节与伴侣共度时间是否会带来幸福感的提升或下降。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;46(4):572-589. doi: 10.1177/0146167219867960. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
Opioids and social bonding: Effect of naltrexone on feelings of social connection and ventral striatum activity to close others.阿片类药物与社交联系:纳曲酮对社交联系感和对亲近他人的腹侧纹状体活动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Apr;149(4):732-745. doi: 10.1037/xge0000674. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
4
Exclude me, enjoy us? Unmitigated communion and relationship satisfaction across 7 years.排除我,享受我们?7 年来不变的交流和关系满意度。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Sep;34(6):653-663. doi: 10.1037/fam0000620. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
5
Symptom accommodation, trichotillomania-by-proxy, and interpersonal functioning in trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder).拔毛癖(毛发拉扯障碍)中的症状适应、代理型拔毛癖和人际功能
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;65:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
6
Romantic Relationship Satisfaction and Ambulatory Blood Pressure During Social Interactions: Specificity or Spillover Effects?浪漫关系满意度与社交互动期间的动态血压:特异性还是溢出效应?
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Mar 1;53(3):223-231. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay030.
7
The link between sacrifice and relational and personal well-being: A meta-analysis.牺牲与关系和个人幸福感之间的联系:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Oct;146(10):900-921. doi: 10.1037/bul0000297. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
More or less: Newlyweds' preferred and received social support, affect, and relationship satisfaction.或多或少:新婚夫妇偏好的和获得的社会支持、情感和关系满意度。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Oct;32(7):860-872. doi: 10.1037/fam0000440. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
9
Patterns of interaction in adolescent romantic relationships: Distinct features and links to other close relationships.青少年恋爱关系中的互动模式:独特特征及与其他亲密关系的联系。
J Adolesc. 2008 Dec;31(6):771-88. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.10.007. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
10
How interdependent are stay/leave decisions? On staying in the relationship for the sake of the romantic partner.留/离决策有多相互依赖?为了伴侣而留在关系中。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov;115(5):805-824. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000139. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Daily relationship satisfaction and markers of health: Findings from a smartphone-based assessment.日常关系满意度与健康指标:基于智能手机评估的结果
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Feb 25;17(1):e12627. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12627. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
Longitudinal associations of spousal support and strain with health and well-being: An outcome-wide study of married older U.S. Adults.配偶支持与压力对健康和幸福感的纵向关联:一项针对美国已婚老年人的全结果研究。
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e13057. doi: 10.1111/famp.13057. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
3
Patient Perspectives on Intimate Relationship Outcomes After Labiaplasty: A Preliminary Qualitative Analysis.患者对阴唇整形术后亲密关系结果的看法:初步定性分析。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 May 15;44(6):641-646. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad380.
4
Impression management in daily life: an experience sampling test for the expression of impression management as interpersonally oriented self-control.日常生活中的印象管理:一项关于将印象管理表达视为以人际为导向的自我控制的经验抽样测试。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 28;14:1198891. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1198891. eCollection 2023.
5
Parents regulate arousal while sharing experiences with their child: a study of pupil diameter change responses.父母在与孩子分享经历时调节唤醒水平:一项关于瞳孔直径变化反应的研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jun 16;17:1177687. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1177687. eCollection 2023.
6
Interdependencies Between Family and Friends in Daily Life: Personality Differences and Associations with Affective Well-Being Across the Lifespan.日常生活中家人与朋友间的相互依存关系:人格差异以及与一生情感幸福的关联
Eur J Pers. 2023 Mar-Apr;37(2):154-170. doi: 10.1177/08902070211072745. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
7
Exploring the effects of COVID-19 on motorcycle riding patterns and its importance.探索新冠疫情对摩托车骑行模式的影响及其重要性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 30;14:994128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.994128. eCollection 2023.
8
Paradoxical Impacts of Social Relationship on Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间社会关系对幸福感的矛盾影响
J Happiness Stud. 2023;24(2):745-767. doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00614-2. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
9
Understanding the Consequences of Moment-by-Moment Fluctuations in Mood and Social Experience for Paranoid Ideation in Psychotic Disorders.理解精神疾病中情绪和社会体验的逐时波动对偏执观念的影响。
Schizophr Bull Open. 2022 Oct 5;3(1):sgac064. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac064. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Comparing the Reliability and Validity of Global Self-Report Measures of Subjective Well-Being With Experiential Day Reconstruction Measures.比较全球主观幸福感自评量表与经验性日间重建测量的可靠性和有效性。
Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):102-116. doi: 10.1177/1073191117744660. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

1
A direct comparison of the day reconstruction method (DRM) and the experience sampling method (ESM).日重建法(DRM)与经验抽样法(ESM)的直接比较。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Mar;120(3):816-835. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000289. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
The Highs and Lows of Love: Romantic Relationship Quality Moderates Whether Spending Time With One's Partner Predicts Gains or Losses in Well-Being.爱情的高低起伏:浪漫关系质量调节与伴侣共度时间是否会带来幸福感的提升或下降。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;46(4):572-589. doi: 10.1177/0146167219867960. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
3
The Validity of the Day Reconstruction Method in the German Socio-Economic Panel Study.日重建法在德国社会经济面板研究中的有效性
Soc Indic Res. 2017 Jan;130(1):213-232. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-1172-6. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
4
Comparing the Reliability and Validity of Global Self-Report Measures of Subjective Well-Being With Experiential Day Reconstruction Measures.比较全球主观幸福感自评量表与经验性日间重建测量的可靠性和有效性。
Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):102-116. doi: 10.1177/1073191117744660. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
5
Income reliably predicts daily sadness, but not happiness: A replication and extension of Kushlev, Dunn, & Lucas (2015).收入能可靠地预测每日的悲伤情绪,但不能预测幸福:对库什列夫、邓恩和卢卡斯(2015年)研究的复制与拓展。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2016 Nov;7(8):828-836. doi: 10.1177/1948550616657599. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
6
Day-to-day affect is surprisingly stable: A two-year longitudinal study of well-being.日常情绪出奇地稳定:一项关于幸福感的两年纵向研究。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017 Jan;8(1):45-54. doi: 10.1177/1948550616662129. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Child Care Time, Parents' Well-Being, and Gender: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey.育儿时间、父母的幸福感与性别:来自美国时间使用调查的证据
J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25:2469-2479. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0416-7. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
8
Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think.对混杂结构进行统计控制比你想象的要难。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152719. eCollection 2016.
9
Time for Each Other: Work and Family Constraints Among Couples.相互陪伴的时间:夫妻间的工作与家庭限制
J Marriage Fam. 2016 Feb 1;78(1):142-164. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12255. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
10
How Was the Weekend? How the Social Context Underlies Weekend Effects in Happiness and Other Emotions for US Workers.周末过得如何?美国工人幸福及其他情绪方面的周末效应背后的社会背景因素
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145123. eCollection 2015.