Ammar Achraf, Trabelsi Khaled, Müller Patrick, Bouaziz Bassem, Boukhris Omar, Glenn Jordan M, Bott Nick, Driss Tarak, Chtourou Hamdi, Müller Notger, Hökelmann Anita
Institute of Sport Sciences, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39104 Magdeburg, Germany.
UR15JS01: Education, Motricity, Sport and Health (EM2S), High Institute of Sport and Physical Education, University of Sfax, Sfax 3000, Tunisia.
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 19;9(3):835. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030835.
As the food industry is continually involved in the development of new attractive alternative therapeutic agents, the evaluation of the beneficial impact of (poly)phenols on cognitive and brain function during aging has gained increasing interest.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the acute and chronic effects of (poly)phenol-rich diet supplementation on cognitive function and brain health in aging adults.
PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) published from inception to July 2019.
Two researchers independently screened 4303 records, using the PICOS criteria: Participants were aging adults; Intervention was based on acute and/or chronic (poly)phenols-rich supplementation; Comparator was any comparator; Outcomes included cognitive function and neuroprotective measures; and Study design was RCTs. A third researcher was consulted when discrepancies arose. Fifteen high-quality (mean PEDro score = 8.8 ± 0.56) RCTs (total participants: 918 healthy older adults) were included in the final sample.
Information on study design, employed treatment, characteristics of participants, outcomes, and the correspondent assessing methods were extracted. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Data Analysis and Results: A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates across studies. Effect size (ES) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Pooled results yielded a trivial ES (-0.2 to 0.03) for brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neuroinflammatory parameters and small (0.36) to moderate (0.82) ES for executive functions.
This meta-analysis failed to provide evidence regarding the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effect of (poly)phenols supplementation in aging adults. However, findings from individual studies, included in this systematic review, suggest polyphenol-rich supplementation may improve some cognitive and brain functions in older adults. The beneficial effect of polyphenols seems to depend on ingested dose and bioavailability. Results suggest at least an intermediate dose (≥500 mg), and intermediate (≈9%) to high (43%) bioavailability rates are needed to cross the brain blood barrier and to exert a significant effect on cognitive health.
由于食品行业不断参与开发新的有吸引力的替代治疗剂,(多)酚类物质对衰老过程中认知和脑功能的有益影响评估受到了越来越多的关注。
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估富含(多)酚类饮食补充剂对老年人认知功能和脑健康的急性和慢性影响。
检索了PubMed和Web of Science数据库中从创刊到2019年7月发表的相关随机安慰剂对照试验(RCT)。
两名研究人员使用PICOS标准独立筛选了4303条记录:参与者为老年人;干预基于急性和/或慢性富含(多)酚类物质的补充剂;对照为任何对照;结局包括认知功能和神经保护措施;研究设计为RCT。出现分歧时咨询了第三名研究人员。最终样本纳入了15项高质量(平均PEDro评分为8.8±0.56)的RCT(总参与者:918名健康老年人)。
提取了关于研究设计、采用的治疗方法、参与者特征、结局以及相应评估方法的信息。遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。数据分析与结果:采用随机效应荟萃分析汇总各研究的估计值。计算效应量(ES)及其95%置信区间(CI)。汇总结果显示,脑源性神经营养因子和神经炎症参数的效应量微不足道(-0.2至0.03),执行功能的效应量为小(0.36)至中(0.82)。
本荟萃分析未能提供关于补充(多)酚类物质对老年人神经保护和抗炎作用的证据。然而,纳入本系统评价的个别研究结果表明,富含多酚的补充剂可能改善老年人的一些认知和脑功能。多酚的有益作用似乎取决于摄入剂量和生物利用度。结果表明,至少需要中等剂量(≥500毫克)以及中等(约9%)至高(43%)的生物利用度才能穿过血脑屏障并对认知健康产生显著影响。