• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检中局部麻醉与骶管阻滞麻醉效果的比较:一项随机对照研究。

Comparison of the Efficacy of Local Anesthesia Methods and Caudal Regional Anesthesia in Prostate Biopsy Applied Under Transrectal Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Study.

机构信息

Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Ankara, Turkey.

Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Urol J. 2020 Mar 14;17(6):597-601. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5503.

DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.5503
PMID:32207137
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of caudal regional anesthesia and local anesthesia methods in prostate biopsy applied under transrectal ultrasonography. Matherials and Methods: This prospective study included a total of 160 patients randomly separated into 4 equal groups as intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), periprostatic local anesthesia (PPLA), combined local anesthesia (IRLA+PPLA), and caudal regional anesthesia (CRA). The patients were evaluated using the pain scores on a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

The pain score during anesthesia induction was significantly higher in the CRA group than in the IRLA and IRLA+PPLA groups (p<0.001). The pain score during entry of the probe to the rectum and movement was significantly lower in the CRA group than the IRLA groups (p=0.014). The pain score on penetration of the needle to the prostate and at 30 mins after the biopsy was significantly higher in the IRLA group (p<0.001). At 2 hours after the biopsy, the pain score in the CRA group was significantly lower than IRLA groups (p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

The PPLA alone can be applied more quickly than CRA, causes less pain during the application, and has similar efficacy in reducing pain during and after the prostate biopsy procedure.

摘要

目的

评估经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检中应用的骶管区域麻醉和局部麻醉方法的疗效。

材料和方法

本前瞻性研究共纳入 160 例患者,随机分为 4 组,分别为直肠内局部麻醉(IRLA)、前列腺周围局部麻醉(PPLA)、联合局部麻醉(IRLA+PPLA)和骶管区域麻醉(CRA)。采用视觉模拟评分法评估患者的疼痛评分。

结果

CRA 组麻醉诱导时的疼痛评分明显高于 IRLA 和 IRLA+PPLA 组(p<0.001)。CRA 组探针进入直肠和移动时的疼痛评分明显低于 IRLA 组(p=0.014)。IRLA 组穿刺针进入前列腺和活检后 30 分钟的疼痛评分明显升高(p<0.001)。活检后 2 小时,CRA 组的疼痛评分明显低于 IRLA 组(p=0.015)。

结论

与 CRA 相比,单独应用 PPLA 可更快起效,应用过程中疼痛更小,在减轻前列腺活检过程中和之后的疼痛方面具有相似的疗效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Efficacy of Local Anesthesia Methods and Caudal Regional Anesthesia in Prostate Biopsy Applied Under Transrectal Ultrasonography: A Randomized Controlled Study.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检中局部麻醉与骶管阻滞麻醉效果的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Urol J. 2020 Mar 14;17(6):597-601. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5503.
2
Prospective comparison of the efficacy of caudal versus periprostatic nerve block, both with intrarectal local anesthesia, during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostatic needle biopsy.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检时,尾骨阻滞与前列腺周围神经阻滞联合直肠内局部麻醉效果的前瞻性比较。
Scand J Urol. 2017 Aug;51(4):245-250. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1318299. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
3
Periprostatic nerve block alone versus combined with perineal pudendal nerve block or intrarectal local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检中单纯前列腺周神经阻滞与联合会阴阴部神经阻滞或直肠内局部麻醉的效果比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Int J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(8):833-838. doi: 10.1111/iju.14036. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
4
Prospective comparison among three intrarectal anesthetic treatments combined with periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检中三种联合直肠内麻醉处理与前列腺周围神经阻滞的前瞻性比较。
World J Urol. 2018 Feb;36(2):193-199. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2136-z. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
5
[Intrarectal local anesthesia versus periprostatic nerve block in transrectal prostate biopsy for patients with different prostate volumes: A prospective randomized controlled trial].不同前列腺体积患者经直肠前列腺穿刺活检中直肠内局部麻醉与前列腺周围神经阻滞的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2018 May;24(5):393-398.
6
A meta-analysis of local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检局部麻醉的荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;10(2):127-36. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500935. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
7
Local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: A meta-analysis.经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检的局部麻醉:荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 12;7:40421. doi: 10.1038/srep40421.
8
Local anesthesia type affects cancer detection rate in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.局部麻醉类型影响经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的癌症检出率。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Sep-Oct;41(5):859-63. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0337.
9
Pelvic plexus block is more effective than periprostatic nerve block for pain control during office transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a single center, prospective, randomized, double arm study.经直肠超声引导前列腺活检术中,盆丛阻滞比前列腺周围神经阻滞更能有效控制疼痛:一项单中心前瞻性随机双盲研究。
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
10
Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检术中用于疼痛控制的局部麻醉:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pain Res. 2016 Oct 11;9:787-796. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S117451. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Lower Dose of 5 mL of 1% Lidocaine is More Suitable than the Conventional 10 mL for Caudal Block in Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.在经直肠前列腺活检中,5毫升1%利多卡因的低剂量比传统的10毫升更适合用于骶管阻滞:一项回顾性队列研究。
Adv Urol. 2024 Feb 14;2024:9331738. doi: 10.1155/2024/9331738. eCollection 2024.