Suppr超能文献

交叉性与戒烟:探索理解健康不平等的多种方法。

Intersectionality and Smoking Cessation: Exploring Various Approaches for Understanding Health Inequities.

机构信息

Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity (HOPE), Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Department of Behavioral Science, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):115-123. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa052.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many marginalized groups smoke at higher rates and have greater difficulty quitting than less marginalized groups. Most research on smoking cessation inequities has focused on a single sociodemographic attribute (eg, race or socioeconomic status), yet individuals possess multiple attributes that may increase risk. The current study used an intersectionality framework to examine how the interplay between multiple marginalized attributes may impact smoking cessation outcomes.

METHODS

A diverse sample of 344 adults enrolled in a smoking cessation program and reported on sociodemographic attributes (eg, race/ethnicity, gender, income) and continuous smoking abstinence on their quit date and at 1, 2, and 4 weeks postquit date. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate whether intersectional links among race/ethnicity, gender, and income were related to smoking cessation outcomes.

RESULTS

Lower household income may be related to higher risk of smoking cessation failure. There were no significant interactions among race/ethnicity, gender, and income in predicting relapse. Pairwise intersectional group differences suggested some groups may be at higher risk of relapse. Number of marginalized sociodemographic attributes did not predict relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Intersectionality may be a promising framework for addressing health inequities, and may help elucidate how to best design and target intervention efforts for individuals characterized by sociodemographic intersections that concur particularly high risk for poor tobacco cessation outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS

Despite an overall decline in smoking rates, socioeconomic inequities in smoking prevalence and cancer mortality are widening. Efforts targeting tobacco cessation should incorporate new theory to capture the complex set of factors that may account for tobacco cessation inequities (eg, multiple aspects of identity that may influence access to tobacco cessation treatment and exposure to certain stressors that impede cessation efforts). Intersectionality may be a promising framework for addressing health inequities in tobacco use and cessation and may help elucidate how to best design and target intervention efforts for individuals that concur particularly high risk for poor tobacco cessation outcomes.

摘要

目的

许多边缘化群体的吸烟率更高,戒烟难度也比非边缘化群体更大。大多数关于戒烟不平等的研究都集中在单一的社会人口统计学属性(例如,种族或社会经济地位)上,但个体拥有多个可能增加风险的属性。本研究使用交叉性框架来研究多种边缘化属性之间的相互作用如何影响戒烟结果。

方法

一个多样化的样本包括 344 名参加戒烟计划的成年人,他们报告了社会人口统计学属性(例如,种族/族裔、性别、收入)以及在戒烟日期以及戒烟后 1、2 和 4 周的连续吸烟禁欲情况。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型来估计种族/族裔、性别和收入之间的交叉联系是否与戒烟结果相关。

结果

较低的家庭收入可能与戒烟失败的风险增加有关。在预测复吸方面,种族/族裔、性别和收入之间没有显著的相互作用。成对的交叉性群体差异表明,某些群体可能面临更高的复吸风险。边缘化社会人口统计学属性的数量并未预测复吸。

结论

交叉性可能是解决健康不平等问题的一个有前途的框架,并且可能有助于阐明如何针对具有特定社会人口统计学交叉特征的个体设计和靶向干预措施,这些个体特征可能特别容易出现不良的烟草戒断结果。

意义

尽管吸烟率总体下降,但吸烟率和癌症死亡率的社会经济不平等正在扩大。针对戒烟的努力应纳入新的理论,以捕捉可能导致戒烟不平等的一系列复杂因素(例如,可能影响戒烟治疗获取和暴露于某些阻碍戒烟努力的应激源的身份的多个方面)。交叉性可能是解决烟草使用和戒烟方面健康不平等问题的一个有前途的框架,并且可能有助于阐明如何针对具有特定社会人口统计学交叉特征的个体设计和靶向干预措施,这些个体特征可能特别容易出现不良的烟草戒断结果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
8
Cancer statistics, 2018.癌症统计数据,2018 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. Epub 2018 Jan 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验