Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Polytechnical Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
mBio. 2020 Mar 24;11(2):e00329-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00329-20.
Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) is abundant in marine environments and an important source of reduced carbon and sulfur for marine bacteria. While both and possessed genes encoding the DMSP demethylation and cleavage pathways, their responses to DMSP differed. A glucose-fed, chemostat culture of consumed 99% of the DMSP even when fed a high concentration of 5 mM. At the same time, cultures released 19% and 7.1% of the DMSP as dimethylsulfide (DMS) and methanethiol, respectively. Under the same conditions, consumed only 28% of the DMSP and formed one-third of the amount of gases. To examine the pathways of sulfur and methyl C assimilation, glucose-fed chemostats of both species were fed 100 μM mixtures of unlabeled and doubly labeled [-C, S]DMSP. Both species derived nearly all of their sulfur from DMSP despite high sulfate availability. In addition, only 33% and 50% of the methionine was biosynthesized from the direct capture of methanethiol in and , respectively. The remaining methionine was biosynthesized by the random assembly of free sulfide and methyl-tetrahydrofolate derived from DMSP. Thus, although the two species possessed similar genes encoding DMSP metabolism, their growth responses were very different. Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) is abundant in marine environments and an important source of reduced carbon and sulfur for marine bacteria. DMSP is the precursor for the majority of atmospheric dimethylsulfide (DMS), a climatically active gas that connects the marine and terrestrial sulfur cycles. Although research into the assimilation of DMSP has been conducted for over 20 years, the fate of DMSP in microbial biomass is not well understood. In particular, the biosynthesis of methionine from DMSP has been a focal point, and it has been widely believed that most methionine was synthesized via the direct capture of methanethiol. Using an isotopic labeling strategy, we have demonstrated that the direct capture of methanethiol is not the primary pathway used for methionine biosynthesis in two species, a genus comprised primarily of globally abundant marine bacteria. Furthermore, although the catabolism of DMSP by these species varied greatly, the anabolic pathways were highly conserved.
二甲基巯丙酸盐 (DMSP) 在海洋环境中含量丰富,是海洋细菌还原碳和硫的重要来源。虽然 和 都具有编码 DMSP 去甲基化和裂解途径的基因,但它们对 DMSP 的反应不同。在葡萄糖喂养的恒化器培养物中, 即使在 5 mM 的高浓度下也消耗了 99%的 DMSP。同时,培养物分别以二甲基硫 (DMS) 和甲硫醇的形式释放了 19%和 7.1%的 DMSP。在相同条件下, 只消耗了 DMSP 的 28%,形成了气体的三分之一。为了研究硫和甲基 C 的同化途径,两种物种的葡萄糖喂养恒化器都喂食了未标记和双重标记的 [-C,S]DMSP 的 100 μM 混合物。尽管硫酸盐供应充足,但两种物种几乎都从 DMSP 中获得了所有的硫。此外,只有 33%和 50%的蛋氨酸分别直接从甲硫醇中生物合成 在 和 中。其余的蛋氨酸是由 DMSP 衍生的游离硫化物和甲基四氢叶酸的随机组装生物合成的。因此,尽管这两个物种具有相似的编码 DMSP 代谢的基因,但它们的生长反应却非常不同。二甲基巯丙酸盐 (DMSP) 在海洋环境中含量丰富,是海洋细菌还原碳和硫的重要来源。DMSP 是大气中二甲基硫 (DMS) 的主要前体,DMS 是一种活跃的气候气体,将海洋和陆地硫循环连接起来。尽管对 DMSP 同化的研究已经进行了 20 多年,但微生物生物量中 DMSP 的命运还不是很清楚。特别是,DMSP 合成蛋氨酸一直是一个焦点,人们普遍认为大多数蛋氨酸是通过直接捕获甲硫醇合成的。通过同位素标记策略,我们已经证明,在两个 物种中,直接捕获甲硫醇不是用于蛋氨酸生物合成的主要途径,这两个物种主要由全球丰富的海洋细菌组成。此外,尽管这些物种对 DMSP 的分解代谢差异很大,但合成途径高度保守。