Horan Richard D, Finnoff David, Berry Kevin, Reeling Carson, Shogren Jason F
1Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA.
2Department of Economics and Finance, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY USA.
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2018;70(3):713-730. doi: 10.1007/s10640-018-0227-y. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
Most models designed to understand how to manage infected wildlife systems with bioeconomic multi-stability take the initial conditions as given, thereby treating pathogen invasion as unanticipated. We examine how management is an opportunity to influence the conditions, which in turn affect the optimal outcome. To capture these management choices, we extend the Poisson "collapse" model of Reed and Heras (Bull Math Biol 54:185-207, 1992) to allow for endogenous initial conditions and multi-stability. We account for two uncertain processes: the introduction and establishment of the pathogen. Introduction is conditional on anthropogenic investments in prevention, and both random processes are conditional on how we manage the native population to provide natural prevention of invasion and natural insurance against establishment placing the system in an undesirable basin of attraction. We find that both multi-stability of the invaded system and these uncertainty processes can create economic non-convexities that yield multiple candidate solutions to the optimization problem. Additionally, we illustrate how the nature of natural protection against introduction and establishment risks can play an important role in the allocation of anthropogenic investments.
大多数旨在理解如何利用生物经济多稳定性来管理受感染野生动物系统的模型都将初始条件视为给定的,从而将病原体入侵视为不可预见的。我们研究了管理如何成为影响这些条件的一个机会,而这些条件反过来又会影响最优结果。为了捕捉这些管理选择,我们扩展了Reed和Heras(《数学生物学通报》54:185 - 207,1992)的泊松“崩溃”模型,以允许内生初始条件和多稳定性。我们考虑了两个不确定过程:病原体的引入和定殖。引入取决于预防方面的人为投资,并且这两个随机过程都取决于我们如何管理本地种群,以提供对入侵的自然预防以及对定殖的自然保障,防止系统陷入不理想的吸引域。我们发现,被入侵系统的多稳定性以及这些不确定性过程都可能产生经济非凸性,从而为优化问题带来多个候选解决方案。此外,我们还说明了针对引入和定殖风险的自然保护性质如何在人为投资分配中发挥重要作用。